Comparative Performance of Ultrasonographic Fetal Biometry and Three Clinical Equations in the Intrapartum Period for Estimating Fetal Weight in Thai Singleton Pregnant Women Giving Birth at a Referral Tertiary Hospital

Main Article Content

Nuntapong Pongtipakorn
Pongsun Puntachai
Parinya Chamnan


Objectives: To compare the accuracy of fetal weight estimation by ultrasonography and three clinical equations and also to examine the ability of these estimation methods to predict low birth weight and macrosomia in Thai pregnant women giving birth at a referral tertiary hospital in northeastern Thailand.
Materials and Methods: Two hundred singleton pregnant women giving birth at Sanpasitthiprasong Hospital during September 2018 – March 2019 were recruited. Fetal weight was estimated by trans-abdominal ultrasound and three existing clinical equations: Dare’s, Johnson’s and Buchmann’s methods. Proportions of within 10% accuracy compared to actual birth weight were computed and measures of ability to predict low, normal birth weight and macrosomia (sensitivity/specificity, positive/negative predictive values and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUR)) were compared using McNemar’s test and nonparametric method.
Results: The mean actual birth weight was 3,069.9 ± 464.8 grams. Overall, ultrasonography resulted in a higher proportion of within-10% accuracy than Dare’s, Johnson’s and Buchmann’s methods (70.5%, 38.5%, 24.5% and 58.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed for normal birth weight and for both term and preterm neonates. Ultrasonography had the best ability to predict low birth weight with sensitivity, specificity and AUR of 75% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51-91%), 94% (95%CI 89-97%) and 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.94), while Dare’s and Johnson’s methods better predicted macrosomia than the other two methods (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: Intrapartum ultrasonography had the highest accuracy in estimating actual birth weight, overall and particularly best in low birth weight. However, Dare’s and Johnson’s clinical equations appeared to predict macrosomia well and might probably be useful when large fetus is suspected in clinical practice.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pongtipakorn, N.; Puntachai, P. .; Chamnan, P. Comparative Performance of Ultrasonographic Fetal Biometry and Three Clinical Equations in the Intrapartum Period for Estimating Fetal Weight in Thai Singleton Pregnant Women Giving Birth at a Referral Tertiary Hospital. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2022, 30, 234-243.
Original Article


Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, Regan L, Robinson S. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003;111:9-14.

Froehlich RJ, Sandoval G, Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, et al. Association of recorded estimated fetal weight and cesarean delivery in attempted vaginal delivery at term. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:487.

Pallotto EK, Kilbride HW. Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;49:257-69.

McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312:82-90.

McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1234-8.

Kumari A, Goswami S, Mukherjee P. Comparative study of various methods of fetal weight estimation in term pregnancy. South Asian Feder Obstet Gynaecol 2013;5:22-5.

Dar P, Weiner I, Sofrin O, Sachs GS, Bukovsky I, Arieli S. Clinical and sonographic fetal weight estimates in active labor with ruptured membranes. J Reprod Med 2000;45:390-4.

Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Schneider M, Faschingbauer C, Schmid M, et al. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2015;292:805-11.

Malik R, Thakur P, Agarwal G. Comparison of three clinical and three ultrasonic equations in predicting fetal birth weight. Int J Reprod Contracep Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:210-6.

Prajapati DG, Patel RM. Comparison of various method of fetal birth weight estimation in term pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynecol 2018;7:1058-64.

Torloni MR, Sass N, Sato JL, Renzi AC, Fukuyama M, Rubia de Lucca P. Clinical formulas, mother’s opinion and ultrasound in predicting birth weight. Sao Paulo Med J 2008;126:145-9.

Yadav R, Sharma B, Deokota R, Rahman H. Assessment of clinical methods and ultrasound in predicting fetal birth weight in term pregnant women. Int J Reprod Contraception Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:2775-9.

Hendrix NW, Grady CS, Chauhan SP. Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birth weight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial. J Reprod Med 2000;45:317-22.

Esin S, Hayran M, Tohma YA, Guden M, Alay I, Esinler D, et al. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasonography after preterm premature rupture of membranes: comparison of different formulas. J Perinat Med 2017;45:253-66.

Ugwa EA, Gaya S, Ashimi A. Estimation of fetal weight before delivery in low-resource setting of North-west Nigeria: can we rely on our clinical skills? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:949-53.

Tomar GS, tripathi A, Priyanka. Comparison of estimation of fetal weight by two clinical methods and ultrasound at term pregnancy. Int J Med Health Res 2017;3:25-8.

Consultation WE. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157-63.

Institute of Medicine, National Research Council Committee to Reexamine IOMPWG. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Weight gain during pregnancy: reexamining the guidelines. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2009.

Dare F, Ademowore A, Ifaturoti O, Nganwuchu A. The value of symphysio-fundal height/abdominal girth measurements in predicting fetal weight. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1990;31:243-8.

Itarat Y, Buppasiri P, Sophonvivat S. Fetal weight estimation using symphysio-fundal height and abdominal girth measurements in different pre-pregnancy body mass indices. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;25:167-74.

Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sherman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements -- A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333-7.

Johnson RW, Toshach CE. Estimation of fetal weight using longitudinal mensuration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1954;68:891-6.

Buchmann E, Tlale K. A simple clinical formula for predicting fetal weight in labour at term–derivation and validation. S Afr Med J 2009;99:457-60.

DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-45.

Promchirachote C, Yapan P. Accuracy of intrapartum birth weight estimation by clinical equation in low risk thai term pregnant women. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2017;25:214-22.

Altenfelder MdM, Tarlani MR, Sass n, Sato JL, Renzi ACP, Fukuyama M, et al. Clinical formulas, mother’s opinion and ultrasound in predicting birth weight. Sau Paulo Med J 2008;126:145-9.

Noumi G, Collado-Khoury F, Bombard A, Julliard K, Weiner Z. Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1407-9.