The incidence and risk factors of obstetrics anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in at King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital during 2017-2019

Main Article Content

Tanapat Manee
suvit bunyavejchevin
Purim Ruanphoo
Keerati Chiengthong
Parima Manusook

Abstract

Aim: to study the incidence and risk factors of obstetrics anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) during 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019


Methods: A retrospective study of all pregnant woman with vaginal delivery (6714 cases) in at  King Chulalongkorn Memorial during 2017-2019 were conducted. We collected the data of all pregnant women who delivered in our hospital since 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2019, using ICD 10 codes for data extraction and review. The case group comprised of pregnant women with an OASIS (third- degree and fourth-degree perineal laceration). The control group comprised of pregnant women delivered vaginally without OASIS.


Results: The incidence of OASIS is 6% (403/6,714).The significant risk factors are nulliparity vs multiparity[OR: 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.0, p < 0.01], obesity vs normal BMI[OR: 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.7, p < 0.01], forceps extraction vs spontaneous delivery[OR: 4.5, 95% CI 3.1-6.5, p < 0.01], occiput posterior vs occiput anterior position [OR: 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.3, p = 0.01], median episiotomy vs no episiotomy[OR: 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.3, p = 0.01], staff vs nurses[OR: 11.1, 95% CI 5.0-25.0, p < 0.01], residents vs nurses[OR: 13.3, 95% CI 5.9-30.2, p < 0.01], and medical student vs nurses[OR: 3.5, 95% CI 1.3-9.6, p = 0.01].


Conclusion: The risk factors of OASIS  are nulliparity, occiput posterior postition, forceps extraction, median episiotomy, residents and staffs (as the operators). The protective factors are obesity and nurses. Preventive strategies for these factors are advocated.

Article Details

How to Cite
(1)
Manee, T. .; bunyavejchevin, suvit; Ruanphoo , P. .; Chiengthong, K.; Manusook, P. The Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetrics Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) in at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital During 2017-2019. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2024.
Section
Original Article

References

Sultan AH, Monga A, Lee J, Emmanuel A, Norton C, Santoro G,et al.. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female anorectal dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:5-31.

Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjödahl R, Berg G. Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG. 2005 ;112:312-6.

Thubert T, Cardaillac C, Fritel X, Winer N, Dochez V. Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46:913–21.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG). The management of third and fourth- degree perineal tears, green-top guideline No.29, June 2015.

Tung CW, Cheon WC, Tong WMA, Leung HY. Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries after Various Modes of Vaginal Deliveries in Chinese Women. Chin Med J (Engl). 2015;128:2420–5.

Meister MRL, Cahill AG, Conner SN, Woolfolk CL, Lowder JL. Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:310.e1-7.

Gundabattula SR, Surampudi K. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 ;29:391–6.

Djaković I, Ejubović E, Bolanča I, Markuš-Sandrić M, Bečić D, Djaković Ž, et al. Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear in Four-Year Period at Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:1067–71.

Mahgoub S, Piant H, Gaudineau A, Lefebvre F, Langer B, Koch A. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and the role of episiotomy: A retrospective series of 496 cases. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48:657–62.

Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J Jr, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2141-8.