Evolution and Prospects of Educational Pathways in Invasive Prenatal Procedures
Main Article Content
Abstract
Invasive prenatal procedures (IPPs) are integral to the practice of perinatology. The most commonly performed diagnostic procedures include chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and percutaneous umbilical blood sampling. These techniques require precise hand–eye coordination under real-time ultrasonographic guidance. Fetal therapeutic procedures demand even more advanced skills, combining real-time ultrasound guidance with endoscopic surgical techniques. Structured training is essential to minimize procedure-related complications, particularly among less experienced operators. Teaching methods generally include simulation, animal models, mentorship–apprenticeship, and curriculum-based workshops. Simulation-based training employs both low-fidelity box trainers and high-fidelity virtual reality systems. Animal model training offers several advantages over ex-vivo synthetic simulators. Pregnant sheep provide the most realistic model for training and for developing novel in-utero surgical techniques because of their suitable uterine volume and fetal size. However, the cost and ethical concerns remain major limitations. Mentorship–apprenticeship typically begins with observation, followed by hands-on training and progressive responsibility until independent performance. Hands-on workshops offer opportunities to refresh skills in infrequently performed procedures. The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free fetal DNA analysis has significantly reduced the number of invasive diagnostic procedures. Consequently, training programs must adapt to these changing circumstances. This article aims to assess current training paradigms, identify existing gaps, and propose future directions for skill acquisition in IPPs.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Kieu V, Stroud L, Huang P, Smith M, Spychal R, Hunter-Smith D, et al. The operating theatre as classroom: a qualitative study of learning and teaching surgical competencies. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2015;28:22-8.
Senat MV, Deprest J, Boulvain M, Paupe A, Winer N, Ville Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med 2004;351:136-44.
Ghi T, Sotiriadis A, Calda P, Da Silva Costa F, Raine-Fenning N, Alfirevic Z, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: invasive procedures for prenatal diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48: 256-68.
Johnson GG, Brindley PG, Gillman LM. Fidelity in surgical simulation: further lessons from the S.T.A.R.T.T. course. Can J Surg 2020;63:E161-E3.
Vivanti AJ, Benachi A, Saada J, Bonnin A, Letourneau A, Carrara J, et al. Impact of simulation-based prenatal invasive procedure training on professional practice, a preliminary study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021;50:101865.
Wataganara T, Viboonchart S, Chumthup W, Chuenwattana P, Pooliam J, Nawapun K, et al. Comparison of mannequin training satisfaction with a conventional box trainer and a low-fidelity fetoscopic surgical simulator for selective fetoscopic laser photocoagulation. Fetal Diagn Ther 2020;47: 84-90.
Meyer-Szary J, Luis MS, Mikulski S, Patel A, Schulz F, Tretiakow D, et al. The role of 3D printing in planning complex medical procedures and training of medical professionals-cross-sectional multispecialty review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:3331.
Luks FI, Deprest JA, Vandenberghe K, Brosens IA, Lerut T. A model for fetal surgery through intrauterine endoscopy. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1007-9.
Saadai P, Nout YS, Encinas J, Wang A, Downing TL, Beattie MS, et al. Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele with aligned nanofibrous scaffolds-a pilot study in sheep. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:2279-83.
Bergholz R, Krebs T, Wenke K, Boettcher M, Andreas T, Tiemann B, et al. Abdominal wall incision with or without exteriorization of bowel: results from a fetal lamb model for the embryogenesis of gastroschisis. Fetal Diagn Ther 2013;33:55-60.
Stokes SC, Yamashiro KJ, Vanover MA, Galganski LA, Jackson JE, Theodorou CM, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a novel fetal guinea pig myelomeningocele Model. Biomed Res Int 2021;2021:2180883.
Arai T, Tianthong W, Russo FM, Basurto D, Joyeux L, De Coppi P, et al. Experimental induction of complex gastroschisis in the fetal lamb: Systematic review. Prenat Diagn 2024;44:1372-80.
Dreyfus M, Becmeur F, Schwaab C, Baldauf JJ, Philippe L, Ritter J. The pregnant ewe: an animal model for fetoscopic surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;71:91-4.
Papadopulos NA, Dumitrascu I, Ordonez JL, Decaluwe H, Lerut TE, Barki G, et al. Fetoscopy in the pregnant rabbit at midgestation. Fetal Diagn Ther 1999;14:118-21.
Oberg KC, Robles AE, Ducsay CA, Rasi CR, Rouse GA, Childers BJ, et al. Endoscopic intrauterine surgery in primates: overcoming technical obstacles. Surg Endosc 1999;13:420-6.
Ladowski JM, Martinino A, Peeler S, Alderete IS, Medina CK, Bartholomew A, et al. Animal models within surgical simulation: A novel approach to the 3 Rs. J Surg Res 2024;303:275-80.
Cassidy DJ, McKinley SK, Ogunmuyiwa J, Mullen JT, Phitayakorn R, Petrusa E, et al. Surgical autonomy: A resident perspective and the balance of teacher development with operative independence. Am J Surg 2021;221:336-44.
Papanna R, Biau DJ, Mann LK, Johnson A, Moise KJ, Jr. Use of the learning curve-cumulative summation test for quantitative and individualized assessment of competency of a surgical procedure in obstetrics and gynecology: fetoscopic laser ablation as a model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:218 e1-9.
Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan CW, Cao J, Smith AE, Hsiao T, et al. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;396:1285-306.
Tabor A, Vestergaard CH, Lidegaard O. Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11-year national registry study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:19-24.
Akolekar R, Bower S, Flack N, Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of miscarriage and stillbirth at 11-13 weeks and the contribution of chorionic villus sampling. Prenat Diagn 2011;31:38-45.
Hui L, Tabor A, Walker SP, Kilby MD. How to safeguard competency and training in invasive prenatal diagnosis: ‘the elephant in the room’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:8-13.
Olivencia MN, Lam NB, Stewart S, Miller-Hammond K, Johnson S, Nembhard CE, et al. Disparities in diversity, equity, and inclusion in surgical residency education: A systematic review. Am Surg 2025;91:1405-18.
Abbassi Z, Sgardello SD, Chevallay M, Toso C, Ris F, Jung M, et al. The modified competency assessment tool in surgical training. Am J Surg 2021;221:777-9.
Tan SB, Pena G, Altree M, Maddern GJ. Multidisciplinary team simulation for the operating theatre: a review of the literature. ANZ J Surg 2014;84:515-22.
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Audibert F, Kagan KO, Paladini D, Yeo G, et al. ISUOG consensus statement on the impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) on prenatal ultrasound practice. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:122-3.
Scott AK, Oyen ML. Virtual pregnancies: predicting and preventing pregnancy complications with digital twins. Lancet Digit Health 2024;6:e436-e7.
Cabrera D, Nickson CP, Roland D, Hall E, Ankel F. Distributed autonomous organization of learning: Future structure for health professions education institutions. JMIR Med Educ 2022;8:e28770.
Dinh A, Yin AL, Estrin D, Greenwald P, Fortenko A. Augmented reality in real-time telemedicine and telementoring: Scoping review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e45464.
Olakotan O, Lim JNW, Pillay T. Challenges and opportunities in perinatal public health: the utility of perinatal health inequality dashboards in addressing disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2024;24:837.
Berg M, Dahlin LB, Kjellman M. Overview of surgical training and assessment of surgical skills: a narrative review. Front Surg 2025;12:1605495.
Nourallah Bekdache G, Mylopoulos M, Kulasegaram KM, Windrim R. Pedagogical strategies in teaching invasive prenatal procedures: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2019;9:e024629.