A comparison of firtst-void urine, self-administered low vaginal swab, self-inserted tampon, and endocervical swab using PCR tests for the Detection of Infection with Chlamydia Trachomatis in Commercial Sex Workers and Women Attending Gynecology Outpatien
Main Article Content
Abstract
![book_no14_3_5_201-209jpg_page1_768](https://tci-thaijo.org//public/site/images/phupong/book_no14_3_5_201-209jpg_page1_768.jpg)
![book_no14_3_5_201-209jpg_page2_768_01](https://tci-thaijo.org//public/site/images/phupong/book_no14_3_5_201-209jpg_page2_768_01.jpg)
Article Details
How to Cite
(1)
Chandeying, V.; Skov, S.; Farrell, D.; Lamlertkittikul, S.; Lamlertkittikul, P.; Tabrizi, S.; Pradutkanchana, J. A Comparison of Firtst-Void Urine, Self-Administered Low Vaginal Swab, Self-Inserted Tampon, and Endocervical Swab Using PCR Tests for the Detection of Infection With Chlamydia Trachomatis in Commercial Sex Workers and Women Attending Gynecology Outpatien. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2017, 14, 201.
Section
Original Article