Main Article Content
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of 200 µg sublingual misoprostol for converting an unsatisfactory to satisfactory colposcopic finding.
Materials and methods: Forty-two participants with abnormal cervical cytology and unsatisfactory colposcopic finding who underwent colposcopy between September 2016 and June 2017 were randomized into two groups; either misoprostol or placebo given sublingually. Second a colposcopy was performed 2 hours later, and the conversion rate of unsatisfactory to satisfactory colposcopic finding of both groups was analyzed.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. Conversion rate of unsatisfactory to satisfactory colposcopic finding in participants who received sublingual misoprostol was statistically significant higher than placebo group ( 80.9% VS 38.1%, p = 0.011, RR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.18-3.80). There was no significant difference in adverse effect between groups.
Conclusion: Two hundred micrograms of sublingual misoprostol, 2 hours before performing colposcopy can convert an unsatisfactory finding to a satisfactory one.
Keywords: unsatisfactory colposcopy, abnormal pap smear, sublingual misoprostol
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
2. Sankarnarayan R, Budukh A, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low and middle income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:954–62.
3. Apgar BS, Brotzman GL, Splitzer M. Colposcopy, principles and practice: An integrated textbook and atlas. 1st ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 2002. p115–82.
4. Rome RM, Chanen W, Ostor AG. Preclinical cancer of the cervix: diagnostic pitfalls. Gynecol Oncol 1983;22:302–20.
5. Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R. Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A beginners’ manual. International agency for research on cancer. Lyon: IARC Press 2003;89–94.
6. Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO, Keep SL. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;CD001318.
7. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. A randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:427-30.
8. Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of vaginal women before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2006;86:990-4.
9. Aggarwal R, Suneja A, Agarwal N, Mishra K. Role of misoprostol in overcoming an unsatisfactory colposcopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006;62:115–20.
10. Thanapprapasr D, Wilailak S, Israngura Na, Ayudhya N, Lertkhachonsuk A, Likittanasombut P, et al. Can vaginal misoprostol effectively increase rate of a satisfactory colposcopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Japanese Journal Clinical Oncology 2010;40:203–7.
11. Makkar B, Batra S, Gandhi G, Zutshi V, Goswami D. Vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal estradiol in overcoming unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014;77:176–9.
12. Tungmunsakulchai R, Sripipattanakul M. Misoprostol versus placebo for unsatisfactory colposcopic finding: a randomized controlled trial. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;18:134-8.
13. Saav I, Kallner H K, Fiala C, Danielsson K G. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical dilatation 1 or 3 hour prior to surgical abortion: a double blinded randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction 2015;30:1314-22.
14. Aronsson A, Fiala C, Stephansson O, Granath F, Schweer H, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Pharmacokinetic profiles up to 12 h after administration of vaginal, sublingual and slow-release oral misoprostol. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1912-8.
15. Aronsson A, Helstrom L, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Sublingual compared with oral misoprostol for cervical dilataion prior to vacuum aspiration: a randomized comparison. Contraception 2004;69:165-9.