Stability analysis of calibration factor for absorbed dose in water (ND,w) in famer type ionization chambers using 10 years historical data
Keywords:
Calibration factor, ND,w, calibration, dosimeter, ionization chamberAbstract
Background: The calibration factor (ND,w) is an important value related to the amount of radiation given to patients receiving radiation therapy. The ND,w value is obtained by sending an ionization chamber to take the calibration examination at the Department of Medical Sciences Ministry of Public Health approximately every 2-3 years frequently. Still, due to the COVID-19 outbreak situation, the calibration appointment has been delayed. This makes it necessary to consider the discrepancy in calibration factor values that may occur during the period that has not yet been sent for calibration. Objective: This study considered the tolerance values. Historical analysis of ND, w values over 10 years of 2 types of ionization chambers. Methods: Analysis of ND,w values over 10 years of 2 types of ionization FC65_G and FC65_P, including a total of 4 ionization chambers that are most used in radiotherapy. Results: Found the change in ND,w values was within the range less than ±3 % allows us to be confident that throughout 10 years it has a relatively high stability Conclusion Famer chamber has a relatively constant calibration factor, meaning that the radiation measurement performance of all chamber is relatively stable. Therefore, it is believed that during the period when the chamber cannot be calibrated, which may be more than 3 years per round of sending, the Famer chambers can still be used to measure radiation accurately.
Downloads
References
Hohlfeld K. The standard DIN 6800: procedures for absorbed dose determination in radiology by the ionization method (IAEA‑SM‑298/31). Vienna: IAEA; 1988:13–22.
Andreo P. Absorbed dose beam quality factors for the dosimetry of high-energy photon beams. Phys Med Biol. 1992;37(10):2189–2211.
Rogers DWO. The advantages of absorbed-dose calibration factors. Med Phys. 1992;19(5):1227–1239.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy: an international code of practice for dosimetry based on standards of absorbed dose to water. Technical Reports Series No. 398. Vienna: IAEA; 2001.
Minniti R, Shobe J, Seltzer SM, Chen-Mayer HH, Domen SR. Absorbed dose to water calibration of ionization chambers in a 60Co gamma-ray beam. NIST Spec Publ. 2006;250:250–274.
Castro P, García-Vicente F, Mínguez C, Floriano A, Sevillano D, Pérez L, et al. Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9(1):70–86.
Muir BR. Ion chamber absorbed dose calibration coefficients, ND,w, measured at ADCLs: distribution analysis and stability. Med Phys. 2015;42(3):1546–1554.
Karzmark CJ. Concerning radiotherapy standard dose meter calibration. Med Phys. 1980;7(5):574–575.
Manoj S, Harishchandra G, Sakshi S, Ashok K, Aruna K. Variation in dosimeter calibration factor (ND,w) over a period of 20 years. J Med Phys. 2021;46(2):125–127.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Measurement quality assurance for ionizing radiation dosimetry. ICRU Report 76. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Mijnheer BJ, Battermann JJ, Wambersie A. Reply to: precision and accuracy in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1989;14(2):163–167.
Ravichandran R, Binukumar JP, Davis CA. Estimation of absorbed dose in clinical radiotherapy linear accelerator beams: effect of ion chamber calibration and long-term stability. J Med Phys. 2013;38(4):205–209.

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของสมาคมรังสีเทคนิคแห่งประเทศไทย (The Thai Society of Radiological Technologists)
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับสมาคมรังสีเทคนิคแห่งประเทศไทยและบุคคลากรท่านอื่น ๆในสมาคม ฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว