Evaluation of exposure index and deviation index in general digital radiography

Authors

  • Chawee Luechabhun Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Chayathon Sutthiprapha Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Thanaphon Poungpum Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
  • Siriluk Ritbua Radiology Center, Bangkok Hospital, Prachuapkhirikhan, 77110, Thailand
  • Sujika Kongras Division of Radiology, Klang Hospital, Bangkok, 10110, Thailand
  • Lukkana Apipunyasopon Department of Radiological Technology and Medical Physics, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

Keywords:

Digital radiography, Exposure index, Target exposure index, Deviation index

Abstract

Background: The Exposure index (EI) and Deviation index (DI) are key indicators for evaluating the appropriateness of radiation dose and the quality of radiographic images in digital radiography systems. Objective: to assess the distribution of EI and DI values ​​in general radiographic examinations of the chest, abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine using a digital radiography system. Methods: Patient data, technical exposure parameters, index values, and radiation dose information were retrospectively collected according to inclusion criteria from individuals who underwent general radiographic examinations with a Samsung digital radiography unit between October 2024 and February 2025. A total of 602 cases were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The patients ranged in age from 16 to 93 years, with a higher proportion of females than males and body mass index (BMI) values ranging from 12.45 to 46.06. The majority of EI values across all examination sites were lower than the manufacturer’s target exposure index (EIT). Most DI values were between –3 and -1, particularly in chest examinations, while a wider distribution of DI values was observed in abdominal, pelvis, and lumbar spine examinations. Conclusion: The EI and DI values in this study indicate radiation exposure outside the optimal range while still providing sufficient quality for clinical interpretation. Using the EI and DI values to assess deviations helps reflect the image quality, appropriateness of the imaging technique, and patient radiation safety

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Seibert JA, Morin RL. The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population. Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41: 573-581.

Mothiram U, Brennan PC, Lewis SJ, Moran B, Robinson J. Digital radiography exposure indices. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014; 61(2): 112-118.

Tsalafoutas IA, AlKhazzam S, AlNaemi H, Kharita MH. From the use of exposure index in quality control testing to the use of exposure index for quality control of clinical images. European Journal of Radiology. 2022; 9: 100454.

Park H, Yoon Y, Kim E, Jeong H, Kim J. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level; Focusing on general radiography of extremities. Journal of X-ray Sciences and Technology. 2022; 30: 419-432.

Jamil A, Mohd MI, Zain NM. The consistency of exposure indicator values in digital radiography systems. Radiati Prot Dosimetry. 2018; 82(4): 413-418.

Scott AW, Zhou Y, Allahverdian J, Nute JL, Lee C. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016; 17(6): 343-355.

Mothiram U, Brennan PC, Robinson J, Lewis SJ, Moran B. Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement. J Med Radiat Sci. 2013; 60(4): 115-122.

Shepard SJ, Flynn M, Gingold E, Goldman L, Krugh K, Leong DL, et al. An exposure indicator for digital radiography: AAPM Tack Group 116 (executive summary). Med Phys. 2009; 36(7): 2898-2914.

Dave JK, Jones AK, Flsher R, Hulme K, Rill L, Zamora D, et al. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232. Med Phys. 2018; 45(11): 1146-1160.

Creeden A, Curtis M. Optimising default radiographic exposure factors using deviation index. Radiography. 2020; 26(4): 308-313.

กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. ค่าปริมาณรังสีอ้างอิงในการถ่ายภาพรังสีวินิจฉัยทางการแพทย์ของประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: บียอนด์ พับลิสชิ่ง. 2564.

กรมวิทยาศาสตร์การแพทย์กระทรวงสาธารณสุข. ค่าปริมาณรังสีอ้างอิงในการถ่ายภาพรังสีวินิจฉัยทางการแพทย์ของประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: บียอนด์ พับลิสชิ่ง. 2566.

Chusin T, Kaewlek T. An exposure indicator in digital radiography systems. Thai J Rad Tech. 2018;43(1):21-8.

TJRT7-2025

Downloads

Published

2025-12-14

How to Cite

1.
Luechabhun C, Sutthiprapha C, Poungpum T, Ritbua S, Kongras S, Apipunyasopon L. Evaluation of exposure index and deviation index in general digital radiography. Thai J Rad Tech [internet]. 2025 Dec. 14 [cited 2026 Feb. 25];50(1):62-7. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/tjrt/article/view/278994

Issue

Section

Original articles