Strategies to reduce ruminal acidosis by using microorganism

Main Article Content

Vatsana Sirisan


Ruminal acidosis has negative affect on animal production, animal health and economic loss. Therefore, the objective of this article was to review the researches about the use of microbial probiotics to reduce ruminal acidosis. The direct fed microbial are widely used for substitution antibiotic treatment. The bacteria direct fed are composted of Megasphera elsdenii, Propionibacteriam and Prevotella. All of them are used lactic acid to produce propionic acid. Moreover, yeast has more tolerance acid load than other micro-organism. It has reduced lactic acid load in terms of direct and indirect method. The indirect method; Saccharomyces cerevisiae was promoted the M. elsdenii and S. ruminantium to uptake lactic acid. In addition it was activated the Entodiniomorphs protozoal to engulf starch granules; hence reduce the substrate to produce lactic acid by Streptococcus bovis. The mode of action of yeast to reduce lactic acid loads in terms of non-direct was examined the growth rate of yeast in lactic. Especially, the yeast Candida rugose was isolated form ruminal fluid of dairy cow fed high concentrate diet has high specific growth rate for lactic acid as sole carbon source. Therefore, microbial probotic is the alternative method to relieve ruminal lactic acidosis for substitution antibiotic treatment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sirisan, V. (2017). Strategies to reduce ruminal acidosis by using microorganism. Veterinary Integrative Sciences, 15(1), 51–62. Retrieved from
Review Article


Asanuma N., and Hino,T., 2001.Molecular characterization, enzyme properties and transcriptional regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and pyruvate kinase in a ruminal bacterium, Selenomonas ruminantium. Microbiol. 147, 681– 690.

Asanuma N, Iwamoto, M., Kawato, M., and Hino, T., 2002. Numbers of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the rumen as estimated by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Anim Sci J. 73,199–205.

Asanuma N, and Hino, T., 2004. Prevention of rumen acidosis and suppression of ruminal methanogenesis by augmentation of lactate utilization. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho. 75,543– 550.

Asanuma, N., and Hino, T., 2005. Ability to utilize lactate and related enzymes of a ruminal bacterium, Selenomonas ruminantium. Anim Sci J. 76,345-352.

Brul, S., and Coote,P., 1999. Presevative agents in food: mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int. J. Food Microbial. 50,1-17.

Chaucheyras, F.,Fonty, G., Bertin ,G., Salmon, J.M., Gouet, P.,1996. Effects of a strain of Saccharomyces cervisiae (Levucell SC1), a microbial additive for ruminants, on lactate metabolism in vitro. Can. J. Microbiol. 42, 927–933.

Chaucheyras-Durand, F., Walker, N. D., and Bach, A., 2008. Effects of active dry yeasts on the rumen microbial ecosystem: Past, present and future. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 145, 5-26.

Chiquette, J.,Allison, M. J., and Rasmussen, M., A.2008. Prevotella bryantii 25A used as a probiotic in early-lactation dairy cows: Effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics, milk production, and milk composition. J. Dairy Sci. 91,35363543.

Counotte, G. H., Prins, R. A., Janssen,R.A.M., and de Bie, M.J.A., 1981. Role of Megasphaera elsdenii in the fermentation of DL-lactate in the rumen of dairy cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42,649.

Desnoyers, M.,Giger-Reverdin, S., Sauvant, D., Bertin, G., and Duvaux-Ponter, C., 2009. The influence of acidosis and live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on time-budget and feeding behaviour of dairy goats receiving two diets of differing concentrate proportion. Applied Animal Behaviour Sci. 121, 108 –119.

De Ondarza, M. B., and Seymour, W. M., 2008. CASE STUDY: Effect of Propionibacteria Supplementation on Yield of Milk and Milk Components of Dairy Cows. The Professional Animal Scientist. 24,254–259.

Enemark, J. M. D., 2009. The monitoring, prevention and treatment of sub-acute ruminal acidosis (SARA): A review. Vet. J. 176, 32-43.

Fonty, G., and Chaucheyras-Durand, F., 2006. Effects and modes of action of live yeasts in the rumen. Biologia, Bratislava. 6,741-750.

Galip,N., 2006. Effect of Supplemental Yeast Culture on Ruminal Protozoa and Blood Parameters in Rams. Revue Med. Vet.11, 519-524.

Gonzáleza, L.A., Mantecab, X., Calsamigliab, S., Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K.S., Ferret, A., 2012. Ruminal acidosis in feedlot cattle: Interplay between feed ingredients, rumen function and
feeding behavior (a review). Anim Feed Sci and Tech. 172,66-79.

Halm, M. T. Hornbaek, N., Arneborg, S. Sefa-Dedeh, and Jespersen, L., 2004. Lactic acid tolerance determined by measurement of intracellular pH of single cell of Candia krusei and Sacharomyces serevisiae isolated from fermented maoze dough. Int. J. Food Microbial. 94,97-103.

Henning, P.H.,Horn C.H., Steyn, D.G., Meissner, H.H., and Hagg, F.M., 2010 The potential of Megasphaera elsdenii isolates to control ruminal acidosis. Anim Feed Sci and Technol. 157,13–19.

Hernández,J., Benedito, J.J., Abuelo, A., and Castillo, C., 2014. Ruminal Acidosis in Feedlot: From Aetiology to Prevention. The Scientific World J. Kung, L. J., 2001. Developing rumen fermentation with direct fed microbials. Feed Mix. 9,3. Laukova, D., Lubomir, V., and Fridrich, G., 2003. Effect of lactic acid on the growth dynamics of Candida maltose YP1. Czech J. Food Sci. 21,43-49.

Lodi, T., Fontanesi, F., and Guiard, B., 2002. Co-ordinate regulation of lactate metabolism genes in yeast: the role of lactate permease gene JEN1. Mol Genet Genomics. 266, 838-847.

Martin, S.A.,1998. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation with organic acids: a review. J. of Anim Sci. 76,3123-3132.

Narendranath, N.V., Thomas, K.C., and Ingledew, W.M., 2001. Effects of acetic acid and acetic acid on the growth of Saccharomyced cerevisiae in a minimal medium. J. Industrial Microbiol and Biotech. 26, 171-177.

Maiorella, B.,Blanch, H.W., and Wile, C.R., 1983. Byproduct inhibition effects on ethanlic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotech Bioeng. 25, 103-121.

Meissner, H.H., Henning, P.H., Horn C.H., Leeuw, K.J., Hagg, F.M. and Fouché, G., 2010. Ruminal acidosis: A review with detailed reference to the controlling agent Megasphaera elsdenii NCIMB 41125. S Afr J Anim Sci. 40, 79-100.

Long, M.,Peng, L.,Zhang, Y., Xinliang, C., Zenggui, G., and Guowen, L., 2016. Evaluation of the protective effect of the acid-tolerant engineered bacterial strain M. elsdenii H6F32 as a probiotic fed to sheep during the lactic acidosis challenge. Indian J. Anim. Res. 50,330-334.

Moya, D., Mazzenga, A.,Holtshausen, L.,Cozzi, G., González, L. A.,Calsamiglia, S., Gibb, D. G.,McAllister, T. A.,Beauchemin, K. A., and Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K., 2011. Feeding behavior and ruminal acidosis in beef cattle offered a total mixed ration or dietary components separately. J Anim Sci. 9,520-530.

Nagaraja, T.G.,and Lechtenberg, K. F., 2007. Acidosis in feed lot cattle. Vet Clin Food Anim. 23,333–350.

Nikkhah, A., 2015. Management Consistencies to Minimize Subacute Rumen Acidosis: A Herd Probiotic. J. Prob. Health.3,2 Nisbet, D.J., and Martin, S.A.,1990. Effect of dicarboxylic acids and Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on lactate uptake by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 3515-3518.

Nisbet, D. J., and Martin, S. A., 1993. Effects of fumarate, L-malate, and an Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on D-lactate utilization by the ruminal bacterium Selenomonas ruminantium. Curr. Microbiol. 26,133.

Nisbet, D. J., and Martin, S. A., 1994. Factors affecting Llactate utilization by Selenomonas ruminantium. J. Anim. Sci. 72, 1355–1361.

Plaizier, J.C., Krause, D.O., Gozho, G.N. and McBride, B.W., 2008. Subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows: The physiological causes, incidence and consequences. Vet J. 176,21-31.

Rodriguez, F., 2003. Control of lactate accumulation in ruminants using Prevotella bryantii. PhD Thesis. Iowa State University, Ames. Rossi, F., Luccia, A.D.,Vincenti, D., Cocconcelli, P.S., 2004. Effects of peptidic fractions from Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on growth and metabolism of the ruminal bacteria Megasphaera elsdenii. Anim. Res. 53,177–186.

Russell, J.B., and Chow, J.M., 1993. Another theory for the action of ruminal buffer salts: decreased starch fermentation and propionate production. J. Dairy Sci. 76,826–830.

Sirisan, V., Pattarajinda, V., Vichitphan, K., and Leesing, R., 2012. Effect of lactic acid on growth parameter of yeast strains obtained from ruminal fluid of dairy cattle. Proceeding of the 15th AAAP Animal Science Congress Vol. II 26-30 November 2012. Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Thailand.

Weiss, W. P., Wyatt, D. J., and McKelvey, T. R., 2008. Effect of Feeding Propionibacteria on Milk Production by Early Lactation Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91,646–652.

Williams A. G., and Coleman, G. S., 1992. The Rumen Protozoa. New York: Brock /Springer series in contemporary bioscience, Springer Verlag, USA. Wiryawan, I.K.G., 1994. Microbial control of lactic acidosis in grain- fed sheep. Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia.

Zerby, H. N., Bard, J. L.,Loerch, S. C.,Kuber, P. S., Radunz, A. E., and Fluharty, F. L.,2011. Effects of diet and Aspergillus oryzae extract or Saccharomyces cervisiae on growth and carcass characteristics of lambs and steers fed to meet requirements of natural markets. J. Anim Sci. 89,2257-2264.