Nutrient intake of captive small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) in Chiang Mai Zoo and Demonstrated Farming Under Royal Project in Ban Dong Yen, Thailand https://doi.org/10.12982/VIS.2023.033

Main Article Content

Theerapong Nakas
Phichit Chitmin
Ratchaneewan Punyatong
Runglawan Sangsuri
Sasiwimon Jatoorapattarawong
Pattaranun Whongchai
Tharathep Phopheng
Pradit Wonglungkar
Watcharaphong Kittichroenwit
Montri Punyatong

Abstract

Here we examined the feed and nutrient intake of captive small Indian civets (Viverricula indica) housed at the Chiang Mai Zoo (CMZ) and Demonstrated Farming Under Royal Project (DYF) in Ban Dong Yen in Thailand. The feed type and intake was recorded for 4 males and 5 females at both CMZ and DYF. Feed samples were collected for chemical analysis and nutrient intake was calculated in terms of dry matter (DM) to compare CMZ and DYF. There were 11 and 5 feed types at CMZ and DYF, respectively. DM intake of small Indian civets at CMZ was significantly lower than at DYF (32.84 ± 0.852 % vs 38.90 ± 0.184 %; P<0.05). Crude protein, ether extract (crude fat), ash, Ca and P intake of civets at CMZ was significantly lower than the intake at DYF (P<0.05). Meanwhile, crude fiber and NFE (nitrogen free extract) intake of civets at CMZ was significantly higher than at DYF (P<0.05). The amount of wax released by civets at CMZ was significantly higher than those at DYF (2.14 ± 0.43 vs 1.49 ± 0.01 g/head/month) (P<0.05). Results of this study provide guidelines and references for feeds and feed intake for captive small Indian civets.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nakas, T., Chitmin, P., Punyatong, R., Sangsuri, R., Jatoorapattarawong, S., Whongchai, P. ., Phopheng, T., Wonglungkar, P., Kittichroenwit, W., & Punyatong, M. (2023). Nutrient intake of captive small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) in Chiang Mai Zoo and Demonstrated Farming Under Royal Project in Ban Dong Yen, Thailand: https://doi.org/10.12982/VIS.2023.033. Veterinary Integrative Sciences, 21(2), 473–479. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/vis/article/view/261104
Section
Research Articles

References

Altsf, M. 2017. First record of small Indian civet (Viverricula indica) from Azad Jummu and Kashmir Himalaya, Pakistan. J. Wild l. Ecol. 1(1), 17-24.

AOAC, 2012. Official methods of analysis, 19th edition. Association of Analytical Chemists,Washington (USA).

AZA Small Carnivore TAG, 2010. Viverride (Viverridae) care manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD, pp. 107.

Balakrishnan, M., Sreedevi, M.B., 2007. Husbandry and management of the small Indian civet Viverricula indica (E. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1803) in Kerala, India. Small.Carniv. Conserv. 36, 9-13.

Chiang Mai Zoo, 2022. A guide to cultivation and propagation of small Indian civets. Chiang Mai Zoo, Chiang Mai, pp. 1-86. (In Thai).

Chuang, S.A., Lee, L.L., 1997. Food habits of three carnivore species (Viverricula indica, Herpestes urva, and Melogale moschata) in Fushan Forest, Northern Taiwan. J.Zool. 243(1), 71-79.

Kozakai, C., Hata, A., Saeki, M., Takeuchi, M., Ueda, H. Eguchi, Y., 2019. Intake rate of captive masked palm civets on large-sized cultivated fruit, Japanese persimmon.Bull. NARO Agric. Res. Cent. Reg. 6, 23-33.

Lekagul, B., McNeely, J.A., 1977. Mammals of Thailand. Association for the Conservation of Wildlife, Bangkok.

Mudappa, D., Kumar, A., Chellam, R., 2010. Diet and fruit choice of the brown palm civet Paradoxurus jerdoni, a viverrid endemic to the Western Ghats rainforest, India. Tropical Conservation Science. 3(3), 282-300.

National Research Council, 1986. Nutrient requirement of cats. National Academy Press,Washington, DC.

Su, S., Sale, J., 2007. Niche differentiation between common palm civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus and small Indian civet Viverricula indica in regenerating degraded forest, Myanmar. Small Carniv. Conserv. 36, 30-34.

Warghat, N., Sharma, N., Farah, S., Ashwin, A., Ramesh, C. Mumtaz, B., 2015. Molecular Phylogenetics of small Indian civet (Viverricula indica). Asian J. Conserv. Biol.4(2), 116-120.