Influence of Deep Bedding and Fermented Feed Supplementation on the Behavioral Patterns, Adult Fly (Musca domestica) Density and Performance of Crossbred Pigs https://doi.org/10.12982/VIS.2025.021
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study determined the effects of deep bedding floor and fermented feed supplement on the behavioral pattern and adult fly (Musca domestica) density that would be affect to the performance of crossbred pigs. The performance data from 64 (Thai native x Meishan x Duroc) crossbreds were combined from two replicated studies. Pig behavior was continuously video recorded in a real-time mode on Day 1 (initial day), 2, 3, 7 and the end day of Month 1, 2, 3 and 4 for 32 pigs in one block. A 2 x 2 factorial arrangement in a completely randomized design was used with four replicates in one block. Factor A was a deep bedding floor (DB) or solid bedding of concrete floor (SB). Factor B was a feed type of concentrate feed supplemented with a fresh banana stem (BF+CON) or fermented banana stem (FF+CON). The results showed that effects of floor type and feed type on production performance were significant (P<0.05), with concrete floors showing better performance than deep bedding. The study found no significant impact of feed type on growth performance in pigs. Nevertheless, floor type and feed type interaction on production performance was significant for final weight, ADG, and FCR throughout the experiment (0–120 days). However, the behavior of pigs was influenced by floor type. DB pigs spent more time exploring the pen, but spent less time standing and walking than SB pigs. DB variations were found to be dispersed, with positive correlations between standing, nuzzling, walking, and feeding. Despite the possibility of flies being flown across the row, DB row pigs had significantly (P<0.05) fewer flies than SB row pigs. The heatmaps showed that the two groups have different behavioral dependency. The study concluded that the deep bedding floor type allowed for natural exploring behavior of the pigs and reduced the number of flies in the system. However, adverse effects were observed in performance, indicating the need for further study to improve the system.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Publishing an article with open access in Veterinary Integrative Sciences leaves the copyright with the author. The article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited.
References
Amaral, A.G., Carvalho, L.H., Barbosa, E.C., Dantas, A.F.M., Silva, S.R., 2021. Characterization of the thermal environment and evaluation of the behavior of finishing pigs housed in deep bedding and conventional systems. Animals. 11(1), 16.
Angulo-Arroyave, J.J., Herrera, A., Osorio-Díaz, A., 2019. Productive performance of growing piglets in deep bedding system and plastic floor. Rev. Colomb. de Cienc. Pecu. 32(2), 259-268.
Arjin, C., Souphannavong, C., Sartsook, A., Seel-Audom, M., Mekchay, S., Sringarm, K., 2021. Efficiency of fresh and fermented banana stems in low protein diet on nutrient digestibility, productive performance and intestinal morphology of crossbred pig; (Thai native x Meishan) x Duroc. Vet. Integr. Sci. 19(1), 51-64.
Berrocoso, J., Martínez-Sánchez, J., García-Gallardo, J., Fereres, P., 2015. Effects of inclusion of additional fiber (sugar beet pulp, straw, oat hulls and wheat middlings) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microbiota of piglets. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 208, 108-117.
Burgess, R., 2023. How to assess fly density on pig farms. Available online: https://www.daltonengineering.co.uk/blogs/news/assess-fly-density-on-pig-farms (Accessed on February, 2024)
Caicedo, C.A., Rodríguez, M.A., Ramírez, Y., Rojas, D.A., 2021. Fly control in pig farms: a review. Rev. MVZ Cordoba. 26(2), 9784-9795.
Chaiwang, N., Bunmee, T., Arjin, C., Wattanakul, W., Krutthai, N., Mekchay, S., Sringarm, K., 2021. Effect of deep bedding floor and fermented feed supplement on productive performance, carcase, meat quality and fatty acid profile of crossbred pigs. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 20(1), 479–488.
Cho, J.H., Zhao, P.Y., Kim, I.H., 2011. Probiotics as a dietary additive for pigs: a review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10(16), 2127–2134.
Correa, J.C., Pereira, L.F., Cunha, J.F., Souza, J.M., 2009. Performance of pigs reared in deep-litter and partially slatted floor systems during the summer. Livest. Sci. 121, 81-88.
Honeyman, M.S., Harmon, J.D., Kliebenstein, J.B., Richard, T.L., 2001. Feasibility of hoop structures for market swine in Iowa: pig performance, pig environment, and budget analysis. Appl. Eng. Agric. 17, 869–874.
Hötzel, M., Lopes, E., De Oliveira, P., Guidoni, A., 2009. Behaviour and performance of pigs finished on deep bedding with wood shavings or rice husks in summer. Anim. Welf. 18(1), 65-71.
Kaufmann, R., 1997. A deep litter fermentation system for fattening pigs-technical improvements and assessment of environmentally relevant data. J. Rech. Porc. Fr. 29, 311–318.
Kidega, K., Aliro, T., Mugonola, B., Ndyomugyenyi, E.K., Okello-Uma, I., 2021. Effects of different floor types on the growth performance and carcass back-fat thickness of pigs. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 21(2), 47-53.
Kumar, B.L., Gopal, D.V.R.S., 2015. Effective role of indigenous microorganisms for sustainable environment. 3 Biotech. 5(6), 867–876.
Lagu, C., Andama, M., Lee, S., Park, M., Ainomugisha, A., 2017. Prevalence and Intensity of Internal Parasites in Pigs under Indigenous Micro-Organism (IMO) and Conventional Piggery Farms, Greater Mbarara, Uganda. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev. 29, 1-11.
Lahrmann, H.P., Oxholm, L.C., Steinmetz, H., Nielsen, M.B.F., D’Eath, R.B., 2015. The effect of long or chopped straw on pig behaviour. Anim. 9(5), 862–870.
Matte, J.J., 1993. A note on the effect of deep-litter housing on growth performance of growing finishing pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 643-647
Meerburg, B.G., Vermeer, H.M., Kijlstra, A., 2007. Controlling risks of pathogen transmission by flies on organic pig farms, A review. Outlook. Agric., 36(3), 193–197.
Morrison, R.S., Hemsworth, P.H., Cronin, G.M., Campbell, R.G., 2003. The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 82, 173–188.
Morrison, R.S., Johnston, L.J., Hilbrands, A.M., 2007. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103, 12–24.
Riedel, A., Pieper, R., Lautner, M., Leiding, C., Jung, M. Schulze, M., 2024. Influence of deep-litter bedding materials on environmental and welfare-related factors in boar studs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 273(2024), 10621.
Rondón, R.A., Herrera-Ortiz, J.M., Mejía, J.J., 2014. Effect of rice husk bedding on parasite control in growing pigs. Rev. MVZ. Cordoba. 19(3), 4679-4687.
Sheen, S.Y., Su, C.C., Lee, M.S., Chang, H.L., Hong, C.M., 2005. Study on the management model of litter bedded pig houses. Livest. Res. 34(2), 69-78.
Sringarm, K., Chaiwang, N., Wattanakul, W., Mahinchai, P., Satsook, A., Norkeaw, R., Seel-audom, M., Moonmanee, T., Mekchay, S., Sommano, S.R., Ruksiriwanich, W., Rachtanapun, P., Jantanasakulwong, K., Arjin, C., 2022. Improvement of intramuscular fat in longissimus muscle of finishing Thai crossbred black pigs by perilla cake supplementation in a low‐lysine diet. Foods. 11(7), 907.
Stafford, K.C., 1988. ‘Housefly (Diptera: Muscidae) monitoring method comparisons and seasonal trends in environmentally controlled high-rise, caged-layer poultry houses’, J. Econ. Entom. 81, 1426–1430.
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H., 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach, (2nd edition). McGraw-Hill Book, New York.
Taksinanan, N., Tartrakoon, W., Attamangkune, S., Incharoen, T., Charoensook, R., 2020. Effects of dietary fiber level in weaning pig diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology. Am. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 15(1), 81-88.
Tubiello, F.N., Salvatore, M., Rossi, S., Ferrara, A., Fitton, N., Smith, P., 2013. The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 8(1), 015009.
Tuyttens, F., 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92(3), 261-282.
Wattanakul, W., Stewart, A.H., Edwards, S.A., English, P.R., 1998. The effect of cross-suckling and presence of additional piglets on sucking behaviour and performance of individually housed litters. Anim. Sci. (Penicuik, Scotland). 66(2), 449-455.
Wei, S., Guo, Y., Yan, P., 2019. Comparison of two housing systems on behaviour and performance of fattening pigs. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 47(1), 41–45.
Wiegand, R.M., Gonyou, H.W., Curtis, S.E., 1994. Pen shape and size: effects on pig behavior and performance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 39(1), 49-6.
Xu, B., Li, Z., Wang, C., Fu, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Lu, Z., 2020. Effects of fermented feed supplementation on pig growth performance: a meta-analysis. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 259, 114315.
Yadav, S., Bharti, P.K., Chandrahas, C., Gaur, G.K., Abhishek, A., Singh, M., Somagond, A., 2020. Aerobic composting of pig excreta as a model for inoculated deep litter system in sty using Indigenous Microorganisms (IMOs). Indian J. Anim. Sci. 90(12), 1649–1654.
Zhou, C., Hu, J., Zhang, B., Tan, Z., 2015. Gaseous emissions, growth performance and pork quality of pigs housed in deep-litter system compared to concrete-floor system. Anim. Sci. J. 86(4), 422–427.