The Evaluation of Entrance Surface Air Kerma from Conventional Diagnostic Radiography in Prasat Neurological Institute Using Dose Area Product Values

Authors

  • Yutthana Netwong B.Sc., M.Sc.

Keywords:

Entrance Skin Dose (ESD), Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK), Dose Area Product (DAP), Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs)

Abstract

Background : Entrance skin dose (ESD) from conventional diagnostic radiographic examination should be measured for radiation protection to the patient.

Objective : To evaluate the ESD in term of Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK) of the patients underwent conventional diagnostic radiography examinations at Prasat Neurological Institute to compare with the diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the previous studies.

Methods : The ESAK had been calculated using Dose Area Product (DAP) values and Backscatter factor from totally 100 patients of skull, chest, abdomen, lumbar spine and pelvis radiography.

Results : The mean and standard deviation of ESAK were 0.91±0.48 mGy for antero-posterior (AP) skull, 0.70±0.42 mGy for lateral (LAT) skull, 0.08±0.01 mGy for postero-anterior (PA) chest, 0.46±0.21 mGy for AP abdomen, 1.67±0.85 mGy for AP lumbar spine, 3.31±0.80 mGy for LAT lumbar spine and 0.62±0.23 mGy for AP pelvis. The mean ESAK of the patients in this study was statistically significant lower than the mean ESAK of IAEA and comparable references ESAK values published in the literature. The 3rd quartiles of this study also lower than the DRLs of IAEA.

Conclusion : Patient skin dose derived from conventional diagnostic radiography examination using exposure parameter settings in our institute was lower than the DRLs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Commission on Radiological Protection-103.Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Annals of ICRP. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2007.

International Atomic Energy Agency. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiation: an international code of practice, technical report series no. 457. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2007.

Robert PA, Sharon GA, Benjamin AR. Typical patient radiation doses in diagnostic radiography. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1289-302.

Dendy PP, Heaton B. Physics for diagnostic radiology (2nd edition). Philadelphia: Institute of Physics publication; 1990.

Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine (IPSM), National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB), College of Radiographers.National protocol for patient dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. Oxford shire, United Kingdom: NRPB; 1992.

Hart D, Hillier MC, Wall BF. National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 1-12.

Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, et al. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 2017; 46: 1-144.

National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC). Size Thailand.[Internet]. [Cited 2017 Jan 12] Available from http://www.sizethailand.org/sizethai.html.

Muhogora WE, Ahmed NA, Almosabihi A, Alsuwaidi JS, Beganovic A, Ciraj-Bjelac O, et al. Patient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: initial results from IAEA projects.AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 1453-61.

Bureau of Radiation and Medical Devices, Department of Medical Sciences.[Internet]. [Cited 2017Jan 12].Available from http://brmd.dmsc.moph.go.th/radiation/

Singkavongsay A, Saita K. Patient Entrance Surface Dose in Diagnostic Radiology in Hospital in the Central Part of Thailand. Bull Dept Med Sci 2008; 50: 338-45.

Wanai A, Kongkaew P. Entrance Surface Dose Level of Common Diagnostic X-ray Examinations at Songklanagarind Hospital. Songkla Med J 2011; 29: 57-64.

Buncharat S, Hamuttiti P. Patient Doses in Simple Radiographic Examinations in Trang, Phatthalung and Satun Provinces in the Transition from X-ray Film to Computed Radiography. J Health Sci. 2017; 25: 632-40.

Hart D, Shrimpton PC. Fourth review of the UK national patient dose database. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: e957-8.

Japan Association on Radiological Protection in Medicine. [Internet] 2017. Diagnostic reference levels based on latest surveys in Japan 2015. [Cited 2017 Nov 29]. Available from http://www.radher.jp/J RIME/report/DRLhoukokusyoEng.pdf.

International basic safety standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources: safety series no. 115. Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 1996.

Owasirikul W, Iampa W, Meechai T, Chousangsuntorn K, Pongnapang N. Estimating Entrance Skin Dose of Digital Radiography Examination Using Displayed Dose Area Product. Songkla Med J 2017; 35: 343-50.

Published

04-01-2021

How to Cite

1.
Yutthana Netwong B.Sc., M.Sc. The Evaluation of Entrance Surface Air Kerma from Conventional Diagnostic Radiography in Prasat Neurological Institute Using Dose Area Product Values. j dept med ser [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 4 [cited 2022 Sep. 28];45(3):90-7. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/248630

Issue

Section

Original Article