The Study of Cost and Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Targeted Biopsy Compared to Systemic Transrectal Ultrasound Guide Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

Authors

  • Danai Manorom Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute

Keywords:

MRI Targeted Biopsy Prostate, Transrectal Ultrasound Guide Biopsy, Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Background: At the present time, the examination of prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI is an early procedurewhen a prostate cancer is suspected. The biopsy is based on the process of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)fusion targeted biopsy prostate (MRI-Bx), a 3D technology, along with real-time ultrasound, which encouragesdoctors to clearly see the details and location of the tumor in the prostate. This also allows doctors to accuratelyspecify where the biopsy is done without any randomization. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging(mp-MRI) reduces the unnecessary biopsy and side effects. In Thailand, the popularity of the process has increased,but biopsy with MRI can be expensive with the cost of mp-MRI and ultrasound tools which serve the MRI fusion. Thisresearch was to study the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy, compared withsystemic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx) in prostate cancer diagnosis. Objective: To study cost andeffectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) targeted biopsy, compared with systemic transrectal ultrasoundguided biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis. Method: This was a retrospective study of people at risk of prostatecancer examined by MRI fusion biopsy prostate and systemic TRUS-Bx by calculating the cost of MRI targeted biopsyand its effectiveness in reducing false negative results. The results were then compared with systemic transrectalultrasound-guided biopsy. Result: There was an extra cost for MRI fusion biopsy and the incremental cost effectivenessratio was 616.69 Baht per a natural unit increased of the clinical outcome of interest when compared with systemictransrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Conclusion: The prostate cancer diagnosis with MRI fusion biopsy prostatewas more cost-effective when compared with systemic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. The TRUS-Bx patientscan be at risks for the side effects caused by unnecessary biopsy.

References

Manorom D., Paripatananon C. แนวทางการตรวจคัดกรอง วินิจฉัยและรักษาโรคมะเร็งต่อมลูกหมาก. National cancer institute; [internet]2017. [cited 2022]. Avaliable from: https://www.nci.go.th/th/cpg/TextBook%20มะเร็งต่อมลูกหมาก.pdf

Rojanamatin J. Cancer in Thailand Volume X ,2016-2018;[internet] 2021 [cited 2021]. Avaliable from: https://www.nci.go.th/e_book/cit_x/index.html

Suttimaneerat S., Siriboonrid S., Choeypun N. Complications oftransrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy in Phramongkutklao hospital.Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, PhramongkutklaoHospita; [internet] 2014. [cited 2022]. Avaliable from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJU/article/view/63048/51807

de Rooij M, Crienen S, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM, GruttersJP. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging andMR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasoundguided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling studyfrom a health care perspective. Eur Urol. 2014; 66:430-6.

Sangvariyapanis A. Department of medical service, NationalCancer Institution. Hospital-base cancer registry 2020; [internet]2021. [cited 2022]. Avaliable from: https://www.nci.go.th/e_book/hosbased_2563/index.html

Tonry CL, Leacy E, Raso C, Finn SP, Armstrong J, Pennington SR.The Role of Proteomics in Biomarker Development for ImprovedPatient Diagnosis and Clinical Decision Making in Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel). 2016; 6:27.

Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R,et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy.Eur Urol. 2013; 64:876-92.

Kelvin A. Moses, Preston C. Sprenkle, Geoffrey Box. ProstateCancer Early Detection, Version 1.2022. NCCN Clinical practiceGuidelines in Oncology; [internet] 2022. [cited 2022]. Avaliablefrom: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate_detection.pdf

Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R,Parmar MK, et al. PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracyof multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer(PROMIS): a paired validating confrmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815-22.

Venderink W, Govers TM, de Rooij M, Fütterer JJ, Sedelaar JPM.Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided ProstateBiopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, DirectIn-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1058-63.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2022

How to Cite

1.
Manorom D. The Study of Cost and Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Targeted Biopsy Compared to Systemic Transrectal Ultrasound Guide Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. J DMS [Internet]. 2022 Dec. 28 [cited 2024 May 16];47(4):108-12. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/258562

Issue

Section

Original Article