Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with an Early-stage Breast Cancer
Keywords:
Breast cancer, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Axillary node metastasis, Scoring system, Clinical predictionAbstract
Background: Thailand has a high incidence of breast cancer, leading to the development of screening programs to detect the disease at an early stage. Surgery is the main treatment option during this stage. Advanced techniques, such as minimally invasive procedures like breast-conserving surgery, oncoplastic surgery, and sentinel lymph node biopsy, have been introduced to enhance breast cancer surgery, aiming to reduce complications and improve cosmetic outcomes. However, the shift towards favoring sentinel lymph node biopsy over axillary lymph node dissection presents challenges due to resource limitations in many hospitals, particularly the absence of expert pathologists and modern equipment. Therefore, there is a need for reliable tools or scoring systems to identify suitable candidates for this surgery. Objective: To develop and validate a clinical prediction model for predicting the probability of axillary lymph node metastases in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Methods: This study involved analyzing data from 132 early breast cancer patients at Ubonratchatani Cancer Hospital to develop a prediction scoring system. The system was created using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: Tumor size, size of axillary nodes, and presence of lymphovascular invasion have been shown as significant factors in predicting the probability of axillary lymph node metastasis. The performance of our model was excellent as evidenced by an AuROC score of 0.88. Furthermore, the positive predictive values (PPVs) for low, moderate, and high risks were 2.30%, 30.80%, and 75.90% respectively. Conclusions: This scoring system assists surgeons in confidently selecting early-stage breast cancer patients for either sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary node dissection, which is important in hospitals that lack expert pathologists.
References
Rojanamatin J, Ukranun W, Supaattagorn P, Chiawiriyabunya I, Wongsena M, Chaiwerawattana A, et al. Cancer in Thailand vol. X, 2016-2018. [internet] Bangkok: National Cancer Institute; 2021 [cited 2023]. Available from: https://www.nci.go.th/e_book/cit_x/index.html.
Chitapanarux I, Sripan P, Somwangprasert A, Charoentum C, Onchan W, Watcharachan K, et al. Stage-specific survival rate of breast cancer patients in Northern Thailand in accordance with two different staging systems. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2019;20(9):2699-706.
Maiz C, Silva F, Domínguez F, Galindo H, Camus M, León A, et al. Mammography correlates to better survival rates in breast cancer patients: a 20-year experience in a University health institution. Ecancermedicalscience 2020;14:1005.
McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, Down N, Robinson P, Sinclair S, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005;48(3):185-94.
Devarakonda S, Thomas SS, Sen S, Thomas V, Karuppusami R, Cherian AJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer using methylene blue dye alone: a safe, simple, and cost-effective procedure in resource-constrained settings. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021;12(1):210-7.
Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252(3):426-33.
Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol 2014;15(12):1303-10.
Petrelli F, Lonati V, Barni S. Axillary dissection compared to sentinel node biopsy for the treatment of pathologically node-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis of four randomized trials with long-term follow up. Oncol Rev 2012;6(2):e20.
Godazande G, Moradi S, Naghshvar F, Shojaee L. Is Necessary intraoprative frozen section in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients?. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020;21(3):647-51.
Bishop JA, Sun J, Ajkay N, Sanders MAG. Decline in frozen section diagnosis for axillary sentinel lymph nodes as a result of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016;140(8):830-35.
Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB, 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American society of clinical oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(30):7703-20.
Treeratanapun N, Lerttiendamrong B, Vacharathit V, Tantiphlachiva K, Vongwattanakit P, Manasnayakorn S, et al. Is sentinel lymph node biopsy without frozen section in early stage breast cancer sufficient in accordance with ACOSOG-Z0011? A retrospective review from King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital BMC Surg 2022;22(1):1-7.
Orapan T. Evaluation of the benefit of intraoperative frozen section analysis of sentinel lymph nodes in clinically negative node early breast cancer after ACOSOG Z0011 Era. Reg11MedJ 2021;35(1):137-45.
Murata T, Watase C, Shiino S, Jimbo K, Iwamoto E, Yoshida M, et al. Development and validation of a preoperative scoring system to distinguish between nonadvanced and advanced axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2021;21(4):e302-e11.
Zhao YX, Liu YR, Xie S, Jiang YZ, Shao ZM. A nomogram predicting lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. J Cancer 2019;10(11):2443-9.
Zhang Y, Li J, Fan Y, Li X, Qiu J, Zhu M, et al. Risk factors for axillary lymph node metastases in clinical stage T1-2N0M0 breast cancer patients. Medicine 2019;98(40):e17481.
Cho N, Moon WK, Han W, Park IA, Cho J, Noh DY. Preoperative sonographic classification of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: node-to-node correlation with surgical histology and sentinel node biopsy results. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(6):1731-7.
Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE, Jr., Habbema JD. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med 2000;19(8):1059-79.
Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua J, Boolbol S, Fey J, Tan L, et al. A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2004;10(10):1140-51.
Abdulla HA, Salman AZ, Alaraibi SJ, Nazzal K, Ahmed SA, Almahari SA, et al. Risk factors associated with sentinel lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Eur J Breast Health 2023;19(3):229-34.
Obwegeser R, Lorenz K, Hohlagschwandtner M, Czerwenka K, Schneider B, Kubista E. Axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: is size related to metastatic involvement? World J. Surg 2000;24(5):546-50.
Marino MA, Avendano D, Zapata P, Riedl CC, Pinker K. Lymph node imaging in patients with primary breast cancer: concurrent diagnostic tools. Oncologist 2020;25(2):e231-e42.
Kuhn E, Gambini D, Despini L, Asnaghi D, Runza L, Ferrero S. Updates on lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer. Biomedicines 2023;11(3):968.
Cahill RA, Walsh D, Landers RJ, Watson RG. Preoperative profiling of symptomatic breast cancer by diagnostic core biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13(1):45-51.
Koonmee S, Sirithunyaporn S, Phanomsri E. Hormonal receptors status of breast cancer in Northeastern Thai women: an analysis of 241 cases at Srinagarind hospital. Srinagarind Med J 2006;21(4):343-51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของกรมการแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข
ข้อความและข้อคิดเห็นต่างๆ เป็นของผู้เขียนบทความ ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของกองบรรณาธิการหรือของวารสารกรมการแพทย์