Analysis of ROC Cut-off Value of Staheli Index of Footprint on Harris Mat for The Screening of Pes Cavus

Authors

  • Banjobe Ariyaboonsiri Department of Orthopedics, Rajavithi Hospital
  • Pat Chulasiri Department of Orthopedics, Rajavithi Hospital
  • Sora Tonsuthanluck Department of Orthopedics, Rajavithi Hospital

Keywords:

Cavus foot, Radiographic, Harris mat footprint

Abstract

Background: Pes cavus (High-arch foot) was rarely found in outpatient department. There was usually diagnosed by history taking and physical examination and combined weight-bearing film. Anywise, diagnosis of pes cavus was still no gold standard and tool for screening. Recently, one study was published about Staheli index in Harris mat footprint for screening flatfoot in population. The aim of this study is finding Staheli index cut-off for screening, help diagnosis pes cavus and looking for correlation between clinical diagnosis, calcaneal pitch angle and lateral Meary's angle. Objective: To study correlation between sensitivity, specificity of weight-bearing film and Staheli index from Harris mat footprint by compared Calcaneal pitch angle, Lateral Meary's angle and Staheli index for diagnosis of cavus foot. Method: 143 participants were included in this study, examined by Foot - Ankle specialist and diagnosed. Afterward They were sent to X-ray department for shooting both feet weight-bearing film in AP, Lateral and oblique. Then, participants were printed their foot by digital footprint at equipment department. Calcaneal pitch angle and lateral Meary's angle were measured by Foot - ankle specialist and concealed. Staheli index was measured from footprint by research resident. The data were concealed from each other and calculated statistically. Result: Calcaneal pitch angle and lateral Meary's angle were very poor (r =- 0.793, p-value = .001) and not correlated with Staheli index (r = -0.096, p-value = .110) consecutively. The cut-off point of ROC curve for diagnosis pes cavus is at 0.5865 when sensitivity and sensitivity are suitable. (Sensitivity = 73.33%; 95%CI: 58.06, 85.40, Specificity = 50.22%; 95%CI: 43.59, 56.84). The accuracy is 53.99%. Conclusion: Calcaneal pitch angle and Lateral Meary's angle were poor correlated with staheli index. Clinical diagnosis was still highest reliable tools for diagnosis. The cut-off point of screening pes cavus is 0.5865 by Staheli index method with highest sensitivity (73.33%).

References

Jahss M, Kummer F. Investigations into the fat pads of the sole of the foot: Heel pressure studies. Foot & Ankle 1992;13(5):227-32.

Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69(3):426-8.

Plumarom Y, Imjaijitt W, Chaiphrom N. Comparison between Staheli index on Harris mat footprint and Talar-first metatarsal angle for the diagnosis of flatfeet. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;(97 Suppl 2):S131-5.

Perera A, Guha A. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the cavus foot: surgical implications. Foot Ankle Clin 2013;18(4):619-28.

Wicart P. Cavus foot, from neonates to adolescents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98(7):813-28.

Buldt AK, Levinger P, Murley GS, Menz HB, Nester CJ, Landorf KB. Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet. Gait Posture 2015;42(1):42-8.

Aminian A, Sangeorzan BJ. The anatomy of cavus foot deformity. Foot Ankle Clin 2008;13(2):191-8

Schwartz EN, Su J. Plantar fasciitis: a concise review. Perm J 2014;18(1):e105-7.

Ledoux WR, Shofer JB, Smith DG, Sullivan K, Hayes SG, Assal M, et al. Relationship between foot type, foot deformity, and ulcer occurrence in the high-risk diabetic foot. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42(5):665-72.

Hagedorn TJ, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Menz HB, Casey VA, et al. Foot disorders, foot posture, and foot function: the Framingham foot study. PLoS One 2013;8(9):e74364.

Burns J, Crosbie J, Hunt A, Ouvrier R. The effect of pes cavus on foot pain and plantar pressure. Clin Biomech (Bristol) 2005;20(9):877-82.

Arunakul M, Amendola A, Gao Y, Goetz JE, Femino JE, Phisitkul P. Tripod index: a new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34(10):1411-20.

Louie PK, Sangeorzan BJ, Fassbind MJ, Ledoux WR. Talonavicular joint coverage and bone morphology between different foot types. J Orthop Res 2014;32(7):958-66.

Downloads

Published

15-09-2025

How to Cite

1.
Ariyaboonsiri B, Chulasiri P, Tonsuthanluck S. Analysis of ROC Cut-off Value of Staheli Index of Footprint on Harris Mat for The Screening of Pes Cavus. J DMS [internet]. 2025 Sep. 15 [cited 2026 Feb. 3];50(3):52-60. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/272725

Issue

Section

Original Article