The Grammar of Science: How “Good” is Your Instrument?


  • Jaranit Kaewkungwal Mahidol University, Thailand





Download data is not yet available.


Oosterveld P, Vorst HCM, Smits N. Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals. Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2501–12.

National Cancer Institute. NCI's dictionary of cancer terms: laboratory study [Internet]. Bethesda (MA): National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; [cited 2023 Feb 15]. <>

Middleton F. Reliability vs. validity in research: difference, types and examples. Amsterdam: Scribbr; 2019 Jul 3 [updated 2023 Jan 30, cited cited 2023 Feb 15]. <>

Tang W, Cui Y, Babenko O. Internal consistency: do we really know what it is and how to assess it? Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science. 2014 Jun;2(2):205–20.

Frost J. Content validity: definition, examples & measuring [Internet]. [place unknown]: Jim Frost; c2023 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. <>

Shuttleworth M. Internal consistency reliability [Internet]. [place unknown]:; 2009 Apr 26 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. <>

Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165–178. doi:10.15171/jcs.2015.017.

Goforth C. Using and interpreting Cronbach’s alpha [Internet]. Charlottesville (VA): Statistical Consulting Associate, University of Virginia Library; 2015 Nov 16 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. <>

Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research. 2003 June:27(2);94–104. doi:10.1093/swr/27.2.94.

Zeraati M, Alavi NM. Designing and validity evaluation of quality of nursing care scale in intensive care units. J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(3): 461–71. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.22.3.461.

Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal. 2019;11(2):49–54. <>

Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quinonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front. Public Health. 2018 Jun 11; 6:149. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.

Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse, World Health Organization. Programme on mental health: WHOQOL user manual [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998 [cited 2023 Feb 15]. 106 p. <>

Koller I, Levenson MR, Gluck J. What do you think you are measuring? a mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Front. Psychol. 2017 Feb 21; 8:126. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00126.

Barrett D, Heale R. What are Delphi studies? Evidence-Based Nursing. 2020;23(3):68–9. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2020-103303.

Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459–67. doi:10.1002/nur.20199.

Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28(4):563–75. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570. 1975.tb01393.x.

Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25(6):85–99. doi:10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.

Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.



How to Cite

Kaewkungwal, J. (2023). The Grammar of Science: How “Good” is Your Instrument?. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation & Response (OSIR) Journal, 16(1), 40–45.



Invited article