Clinical outcome of carpal tunnel release. Comparison of Conventional versus Limited incision technique for carpal tunnel release in Samutprakarn hospital

Authors

  • มานะ ธรรมธีโรวัฒน์ วารสารวิชาการแพทย์ เขต 11

Keywords:

Carpal tunnel syndrome, carpal tunnel release, limited incision, conventional incision, scissor, blade, pain score

Abstract

Objective: to determine clinicaloutcome of limited incision carpal tunnel release versus conventional incision carpal tunnel release in Samutprakarn hospital
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the results of two surgical techniques, conventional and limited incision. Thirty cases (age 30–65 years) of isolated Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) cases were enrolled in the study. A total of 15 hands underwent limited incision carpal tunnel release were used and release was done with incision and blade and 15 hands underwent conventional incision. Evaluation preoperatively and in 7 , 14 day and 1 months postoperatively was done, (a) clinical status examination, (b) outcome measure using pain score
Results: Limited incision all the patients had good clinical .The night pains symptom to get relieved immediately after surgery. Scar tenderness was present only for a mean duration of 14 -30 days. Limited incision improve pain score more than conventional incision 7 ,14 and 30 days postoperatively ( P<0.01 ) .
Conclusion:Limited incision carpal tunnel release can be considered a feasible alternative to traditional open release.

References

Agee JM, McCarroll HR, Tortosa RD, Berry DA, Szabo RM, Peimer CA. Endo- scopic release of the carpal tunnel: A randomized prospective multicenter study.
J Hand Surg 1992;17A:987–95. [PubMed]

Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Jensen LM. Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery :The relative responsiveness of generic,arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg 1996;21A:338–46. [PubMed]

Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Preva- lence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999;282:152– 8. [PubMed]

Brown RA, Gelberman RH, Seiler JG 3rd, Abrahamsson AO, Weiland AJ, Urbaniak JR, Schoenfeld DA, Furcolo D. Carpal tunnel release: A prospective, randomized
assessment of open and endoscopic methods. J Bone Jt Surg 1993;75A:1265. [PubMed]

Chung KC. Commentary: Severe carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg 2003; 28A:645–46. [PubMed]

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome - Your Ortho- paedic Connection - AAOS”. Orthoinfo. aaos.org. 2009-12-01. Retrieved 2011- 10-05.Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand
Surg 1998;23A:575–87. [PubMed]

Rodner, Craig M.; Katarincic, Julia. (2006) ”Open Carpal Tunnel Release”. Techniques in Orthopaedics ®21(1):3–11© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-04

How to Cite

ธรรมธีโรวัฒน์ ม. (2018). Clinical outcome of carpal tunnel release. Comparison of Conventional versus Limited incision technique for carpal tunnel release in Samutprakarn hospital. Region 11 Medical Journal, 32(2), 1115–1126. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/156916

Issue

Section

Original articles