Dynamic hip screw fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. (case study)

Authors

  • สรวิศ เจนวณิชสถาพร Suratthani Hospital

Abstract

               Failure of dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation occur frequently in the elderly with unstable intertrochanteric (IT) fracture, due to osteoporosis
and poor femoral calcar reduction.
              Objective : To establish the technique of DHS fixation and factors associated with the treatment outcomes.
              Material and method : A retrospective study of 4 cases of unstable IT fracture Evans’ classification type I, whom treated with DHS fixation. The patient age was over 55 years, and the fracture caused by low energy injury. Clinical outcome, postoperative radiograph, femoral calcar reduction, and duration of bone union were reviewed. Neck shaft angle (NSA), Tip-apex distance (TAD), leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured
              Result : Four patients were evaluated, 2 males and 2 females, Mean age was 75.5 years. The mean of NSA 140° and TAD 18 mm. The success rate of anatomical reduction of femoral calcar was 3:1, LLD were: 1 cm. longer 1 case, equal leg 1 case, and 2 cases 0.5 and 1 cm. shorter. The average time to union was 3.4 months.
              Conclusion : The success factors of DHS fixation are stability of the fracture, anatomical reduction of femoral calcar, NSA ≥135 ํ, TAD≤ 25 mm. Post- operative, the patient walk with non-weight bearing for 6 weeks, then partial weight bearing after callus formation.

References

1. Russell T A. Intertrochanteric Fractures. In :Bucholz RW,Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, Tornetta III P,Wolter Khewer, editors. Rockwood and Green’s Fracture in Adults. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippicott Willium &Wilkins; 2010. p.1599-1600.

2. Davis TRC, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Cheketts RG. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures Mechanical failure after internal fixation. JBJS [Br] 1990;72:26–31.

3. Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, Kim JY Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 2001;25(6):360-2.

4. Weinlein JC. Intertrochanteric femoral fractures’ treatment. In: Canale ST, Beaty JH, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics.12th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2013. p. 2738-49.

5. Kumar R,Singh R.N., Singh B.N. Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur .J Clin Orthop Trauma 2012;3(1):28-36.

6. Flores LA, Harrington IJ, Martin H. The stability of intertrochanteric fractures treated with a sliding screw plate. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990; 72:37–40.

7. Setiobudi T1, Ng YH, Lim CT, Liang S, Lee K, Das De S. Clinical outcome following treatment of stable and unstable intertrochanteric fractures with
dynamic hip screw. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2011 ; 40(11):482-7.

8. Dimon JH, Hughston JC. Unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1967 ; 49(3):440-50.

9. Pajarinen J1, Lindahl J, Savolainen V, Michelsson O, Hirvensalo E. Femoral shaft medialisation and neck-shaft angle in unstable pertrochanteric
femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2004 ; 28(6):347-53.

10. Haidukewych GJ. Intertrochanteric fractures:Ten Tip to Improve Results.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91:712-9.

11. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995 ; 77(7):1058-64.

12. Guven M, Yavuz U, Kadioglu B, Akman B, Kilincoglu V, Unay K, et al. Importance of screw position in intertrochanteric femoral fractures treated by
dynamic hip screw. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010 ;96(1):21-7.

13. Abdulkareem IH. A review of tip apex distance in dynamic hip screw fixation of osteoporotic hip fracture. Niger Med J 2012; 53(4) :184-191.

14. Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937
patients. Int Orthop 2010; 34(8):1273-6.

15. De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures J Bone Joint Surg
Am 2012 ;94(14):1266-72.

16. Gundle R, Gargan MF, Simpson AHRW. How to minimize failure of fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.Injury 1995; 26(9):611-4.

17. Lichtblau S. The unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. Orthopedics 2008; 31(8):792-7.

18. Mak JCS, Ian D Cameron and Lyn M March. Evidence- based guidelines for the management of hip fractures in older persons: an update. Med J Aust 2010; 192 (1): 37-41.

19. Lindskog DM,Baumgaertner MR. Unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2004;12(3):179-90.

20. Audige L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF. Implantrelated complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 003;27(4):197-203.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-02

How to Cite

เจนวณิชสถาพร ส. (2015). Dynamic hip screw fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. (case study). Region 11 Medical Journal, 29(1), 13–20. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/180078

Issue

Section

Case Report