Clinical outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Hamstring tendon versus bone patella tendon bone

Authors

  • Sorawit Janewanitsataporn Suratthani Hospital

Keywords:

ACL-R, Bone patellar tendon bone, Hamstring tendon, knee stability, learning curve

Abstract

          Background: There has been increasing use of hamstring tendon (HT) in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) due to simplicity and less impairment of donor-knee function. However, there were limited clinical studies to compare effectiveness between bone patellar tendon (BPTB) and HT in non-academic hospitals.

          Objective: To study whether HT has comparable result to BPTB in ACL-R, factors of knee recovery return to pre-injury activity and learning curve of this operative technique.   

          Materials and methods: This study was retrospective descriptive study. There were 105 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R in Suratthani hospital were included in study. Patients were followed up and evaluated at 6 months including recovery to pre-injury activity, knee stability, complication and learning curve

          Results: The patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL-R with BPTB  23 cases and 82 cases with HT. The mean age was 27.6 years old. Most of them were male (87.6%). Both groups had similar preoperative demographic data, injury to operation time and meniscal co- injury. There was no significant difference in post-operative knee stability and complication between both techniques. 4 factors affected recovery to pre-injury activity were graft type, complication, and anterior laxation. The learning curve shows significant decrease in the operative time after operations more than 60 cases.

          Conclusion: Using HT in arthroscopic ACL-R compared with BPTB were no significant in knee stability and complication. After operations more than 60 cases, the operation time was decrease. ACL-R with HT was preferable for patients with ACL Injury who need active lifestyle after operation.

References

Tiamklang T, Narakol P, Sumanont S. Clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted bone-patellar tendon-bone versus double-bundle hamstrings ACL reconstruction. Srinagarind Med J 2010;25(3):208-14.

ยงศักดิ์ หวังรุ่งทรัพย์ บทความพิเศษ การฉีกขาดของเอ็นแอนทีเรียครูซิเอท ลิกกะเมนต์ : แนวคิดปัจจุบัน ภาควิชาศัลยศาสตร์ออร์โธปิดิคส์และเวชศาสตร์ฟื้นฟู คณะแพทยศาสตร์ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย Chula Med J 1994;38(8):438-46.

Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction hamstring versus bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts: A systematic literature review of outcome from surgery. Review Knee 2005;12(1):41-50.

Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell Jr FE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: Bone-patellar-tendon-bone versus hamstring: Does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2004;32(8):1986-95.

Harris JD, Abrams GD, Bach BR, Williams D, Heidloff D, Bush-Joseph CA, et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 2014 ;37(2):103-8.

Cheecharem S, Lohpongpaiboon C. Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Rajavithi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai 2018;101(2):9.

Chambat P, Guier C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Fayard JM, Thaunat M. The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years. International Orthopaedics 2013;37(2):181-6.

Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA, Pinczewski LA. Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 2001;17:248-57.

Freedman KB, D'Amato MJ, Nedeff DD. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:2-11.

Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ. Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: Is there a difference in graft failure rate? A meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(10):2459-68.

Xie X, Liu X, Chen Z, Yu Y, Peng S, Li Q. A meta-analysis of Bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand Hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2015;22(2):100-10.

Shaerf DA, Pastides PS, Sarraf KM, Willis-Owen CA. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice. World J Orthop 2014;5(1):23-29.

Kulkamthorn N, Arkasihayuth A, Charakorn K, Chaimut M, Reeboonlap N. The study of anterior cruciate ligament footprint in Thai population: A human cadaveric study. J Med Assoc Thai 2012;95(10):167-72.

Magnussen RA, Lawrence JTR, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthrooscopy 2012;28(4):526-31.

Aga C, Kartus JT, Lind M, Lygre SHL, Granan LP, Engebretsen L. Risk of revision was not reduced by a double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique: results from the Scandinavian registers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(10):2503-12.

Laoruengthana A, Pattayakorn S, Chotanaputhi T, Kosiyatrakul A. Clinical comparison between six-strand hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92(4):491-7.

Murgier J, Powell A, Young S, Clatworthy M. Effectiveness of thicker hamstring or patella tendon graft failure rate in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020;26:1362–6.

Wernecke GC, Constantinidis A, Harris IA, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ. The diameter of single bundle, hamstring autograft does not significantly influence revision rate or clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 2017;24(5):1033-8.

Wiwattanawarang N, Rujiwetpongstorn V. Positioning of femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral aimer guide. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88(11):1545-50.

Chernchujit B, Barthel T. Predictive formula for the length of tibial tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92(6):193-9.

Waterman BR, Arroyo W, Cotter EJ, Zacchilli MA, Garcia E’SJ, Owens BD. Septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Clinical and functional outcomes based on graft retention or removal. Orthop J Sports Med 2018;6(3):2325967118758626. doi:10.1177/2325967118758626.

Hantes ME, Raoulis VA, Doxariotis N, Drakos A, Karachalios T, Malizos KN. Management of septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a standard surgical protocol. Knee 2017;24(3):588–93.

Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Carver TJ, McCarty EC. Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autograft: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 2018;34(4):1358-65.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-21

How to Cite

Janewanitsataporn , S. . (2022). Clinical outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Hamstring tendon versus bone patella tendon bone . Region 11 Medical Journal, 36(3). Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/256373

Issue

Section

Original articles