Efficiency of 2-implant retained mandibular overdenture in the patients at Periodontal department, Suratthani Hospital
Keywords:
2-implant retained overdenture, Survival rate of dental implantAbstract
Background: A complete denture can be easy to lose or fall off of lower dentures when chewing or speaking. The dental implant can hold the denture more firmly in place.
Objectives: To study the effectiveness of a removable complete denture attached to two dental implants.
Method: This retrospective descriptive study was conducted at the periodontal unit, Suratthani hospital between 2010-2022. The data were collected from medical records and the dental implant project in honor of His Majesty the King data-based of 217 patients. The purposive sampling was used to recruit the participants. The data were collected using patient and clinical record form, panoramic radiograph, and clinical implant performance scale. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-test.
Results: Most of the sample were female (54.8 percent). The mean age of both gender was 68.9 years.1) The ability to hold the lower denture better than before was 96.8 percent 2) survival rate of the implant was 96.8 percent. Two third of the survival were success, secondly were satisfactory survival and compromised survival respectively, and 3) The most complications were teared/ lost O-ring (82.5 percent), more than half were reline /rebase dentures and screw loosening (58.1 and 51.6 percent respectively).
Conclusion: The dental implant can increase the ability to hold the lower denture, high survival rate. Therefore, it should be extended to patients of other age groups, develop the attachment design to increase the efficiency of occlusion, lower prosthodontic complications, increase quality of life and satisfaction of using denture.
References
Public Health Department, Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. The statistics of elderly population in Thailand, 77 provinces at 31 December 2017 [Internet]. 2017[cited 2018 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.dop.go.th/ download/knowledge/th1533055363-125_1.pdf (in Thai).
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002; 19:3-4.
Naert IE, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A randomised clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in mandibular overdenture therapy. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1(2): 81-88.
The royal dental implant project office, Institute of Dentistry. Dental record for the implant project in the honor of His Majestry the King, on the auapicious occasion of the 80th birthday on December 5th, 2007.
ชาตยา ฤตวิรุฬห์ การศึกษาย้อนหลัง 8 ปี ของอัตราการอยู่รอด ของฟันเทียมคร่อมรากเทียมขากรรไกรล่าง ในโครงการรากเทียมพระราชทานเฉลิมพระเกียรติ พระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว ชม. ทันตสาร 2563; 41(3) : 105-122
Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bimenoglu C. Maintenance requirements associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37(6): 697-704
Kleis WK, Kammerer PW, Hartmann S, AL-Nawas B, Wagner W. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12(3): 209-218.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van't Hof MA, Visser A. A controlled clinical trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 10 years' results of clinical aspects and aftercare of IMZ implants and Brånemark implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15(4): 421-427.
Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17(1): 5-15.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, Quirynen M. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 10-year randomized clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:401-10.
Shumaker ND, Metcalf BT, Toscano NT, Holtzclaw DJ. Periodontal and periimplant maintenance: a critical factor in long-term treatment success. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2009; 30:388-90, 392, 394 passim; quiz 407, 418.
Andreiotelli M, Att W, Strub JR. Prosthodontic complications with implant overdentures: a systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23:195-203
Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:567-72.
Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, GalindoMoreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologist (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17:5-15.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25
Todescan S, Lavigne S, Kelekis-Cholakis A. Guidance for the maintenance care of dental implants: clinical review. J Can Dent Assoc 2012; 78:c107.
Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Mulder J, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of the ITI Dental Implant System. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:297-306.
Al-Ghafli SA, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Kang K. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 102:140-7.
คู่มือรากฟันเทียมเพื่อรองรับฟันเทียมทั้งปากชิ้นล่าง ในโครงการรากฟันเทียมเฉลิมพระเกียรติพระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว เนื่องในโอกาสพระราชพิธีมหามงคลเฉลิมพระชนมพรรษา ๗ รอบ ๕ ธันวาคม ๒๕๕๔ HANDBOOK OF IMPLANT-RETAINED MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURE
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Region11Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
