The Optimal Technique in Repairing Middle Type Hypospadias in Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital

Authors

  • Pisitpon Siriwattana Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • Supon Sriplakich Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Keywords:

Middle Hypospadias, Tabularized incised plate (TIP), Transverse preputial island flap repair (TPIF)

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the results of Middle Type Hypospadias repair by Tubularized incised plate (TIP) and Transverse preputial island flap (TPIF) in Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital.

Methods: Retrospective chart reviewed from 2003 to 2008, 80 patients who underwent middle hypospadias repair were evaluated. Thirty-six patients (45%), underwent Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) and 44 patients (55%), underwent Transverse preputial island flap urethroplasty (TPIF). The success rates were compared according to the surgical technique, age, presence of chordee and catheter time.

Results: The presence of chordee was found in 36patients (45%). The success rates of TIP and TPIF were 45.10% and 45.90% respectively, P=1.000. No statistically significant difference was found in patient age, the presence or absence of chordee, catheter time and overall complication. The operative time was statistically significant difference in between both techniques (TIP Mean 2.44+0.10 hrs and TPIF Mean 3.05+0.12 hrs, P=0.0001).

Conclusion: The success rate of middle type hypospadias repair showed no difference in TIP and TPIF technique. But the operative time for TPIF was longer than TIP urethroplasty.

References

Retik A B, Borer JG, Hypospadias. In: Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW. Perters CA, Wein AJ, editors. Compbell's Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2007:page 3703-44.

Borer JG, Retik AB. Current trends in hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 1999; 26: 15-37.

Snodgrass WT. Bubularizee incised plate (TIP) hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 2002; 29: 285-90.

Snodgrass W, Koyle M, Manzoni G, Hurwitz R, Caldamone A, Ehrlich R. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: Results of a multicenter experience. J Urol 1996; 156: 839-41.

Snodgrass WT, Lorenzo A. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int 2002; 89: 90-3.

Snodgrass WT, Yucle S. Tubularized Incised Plate for Mid Shaft and Porximal Hypospadias Repair. J Urol 2007; 177: 698-702.

Dayanc M, Tan MO, Gokalp A, Yildirim I , Peker AF. Tubularized incised plate ureteroplasty for distal and mid-penile hypospadias. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 102-5.

Duckett JW Jr. Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. J Urol 2002; 167: 1179-82.

Duckett JW. The island flap technique for hypospadias repair. J Urol 2002; 167: 2148-52.

Retik AB, Keating M, Mandell J. Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 1988; 15: 223-36.

Duckett JW Jr, Kaplan GW, Woodard JR, Devine CJ Jr. Panel: complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am 1980; 7(2): 443-54.

Wiener JS, Sutherland RW, Roth DR, Gonzales ET Jr. comparision of onlay and tabularized island flaps of inner preputial skin for the repair of proximal hypospadias. J Urol 1997; 158: 1172-4.

McCormack M, Homsy Y, Laberge Y. "No stent, no diversion": Mathieu hyppspadias repair. Can J Surg 1993; 36: 152-4.

Kass E, Kogan SJ, Manley C, Wacksman JA, Klykylo WM, Meza A, et al. Timing of elective surgery on the genitalia of male children with particular reference to the risks, benefits, and psychological effec ts of surgery and anesthesia. Pediatrics 1996; 97: 590-4.

Hensle TW, Tennenbaum SY, Reiley EA, Pollard J. Hypospadias repair in the adult population: Adventures and misadventures. J Urol 2001; 165: 77-9.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-30

How to Cite

Siriwattana, P., & Sriplakich, S. (2010). The Optimal Technique in Repairing Middle Type Hypospadias in Maharaj Nakorn Chiangmai Hospital. Insight Urology, 31(1), 6–10. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJU/article/view/242655

Issue

Section

Original article