The impact of surgical experience on outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones
Keywords:
retrograde intrarenal surgery, kidney stone, surgical experienceAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of surgical experience on the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to treat kidney stones.
Material and Method: Retrospective chart review of patients who underwent RIRS between November 1st, 2014 and January 11th, 2017; the outcomes were
divided into 2 groups. Group 1 was the less experienced surgeons (fewer than 30 cases for each surgeon) whereas group 2 was the highly experienced surgeon
(more than 300 cases). The surgical outcomes, including operative time, stone-free rates, complications and scope damage, were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: There were 6 surgeons in group 1 and a single surgeon in group 2. Seventy-four procedures were performed by group 1. Group 2 included the first 30
procedures after the surgeon had passed the learning curve. Patient demographic data, including age, sex and location of the stone, were not different between
group 1 and group 2. Group 1 had a smaller stone size than group 2 (1.59 cm vs. 2.34 cm; p=0.006). The outcomes of group 2 were better than group 1, including
operative time (80.48 minutes vs. 43.50 minutes; p<0.001) and stone-free rates (52.05% vs. 90%; p<0.001). Serious complications were determined to be sepsis or
a high degree of ureter injury that required surgical correction. Sepsis occurred in 6 patients in group 1 (8.10%), whereas no sepsis was found in group 2 (p=0.013). There was no high degree of ureteric injury in either group. Three scopes were damaged in group 1 whereas no scope damage occurred in group 2 (p=0.045).
Conclusion: RIRS is a popular procedure for the treatment of kidney stones. Surgical experience is mandatory to achieve excellent outcomes.
References
Zheng C, Xiong B, Wang H, Luo J, Zhang C, Wei W, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal stones >2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):417-24.
Berardinelli F, Cindolo L, De Francesco P, Proietti S, Hennessey D, Dalpiaz O, et al. The surgical experience influences the safety of retrograde intrarenal surgery for kidney stones: a propensity score analysis. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(4):387-92.
Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580-4.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.
Berardinelli F, De Francesco P, Marchioni M, Cera N, Proietti S, Hennessey D, et al. Infective complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery: a new standardized classification system. Int UrolNephrol. 2016;48(11):1757-62.
Berardinelli F, Proietti S, Cindolo L, Pellegrini F, Peschechera R, Derek H, et al. A prospective multicenter European study on flexible ureterorenoscopy for the management of renal stone. Int Braz J Urol Off J Braz Soc Urol. 2016;42(3):479-86.
Guzelburc V, Balasar M, Colakogullari M, Guven S, Kandemir A, Ozturk A, et al. Comparison of absorbed irrigation fluid volumes during retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of kidney stones larger than 2 cm. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1707.
