Penile prosthesis implantation after paraffinoma excision

Authors

  • Ussapol Tantarawongsa Department of Surgery, Police General Hospital, Royal Thai Police, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Dechapol Buranapitaksanti Department of Surgery, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Royal Thai Air Force, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Circulatory tumor cells, urothelial cancer

Abstract

This case report presents an erectile dysfunctional man who requested implantation treatment after paraffinoma excision and reconstruction with scrotal flap. Our special concern was that the deformed anatomy and thick scar might cause unusual events during surgery, resulting in an unsatisfactory outcome.

References

Santucci RA, Zehring RD, McClure D. Petroleum jelly lipogranuloma of the penis treated with excision and native skin coverage. Urology. 2000;56:331.

Svensøy JN, Travers V, Osther PJ. Complications of penile self-injections: investigation of 680 patients with complications following penile self-injections with mineral oil. World J Urol 2018;36:135-43.

Chinchilla RM, González AC, Alcaina LR, Nicolás AG, Asurmendi PV, Acevedo MD, et al. Urological and psychological approach of secondary complications to penile aesthetic modifications. Rev Int Androl 2019;17:101-9.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-02

How to Cite

Tantarawongsa, U., & Buranapitaksanti, D. (2020). Penile prosthesis implantation after paraffinoma excision. Insight Urology, 41(2), 95–98. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJU/article/view/247878

Issue

Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020): July-Dec

Section

Case Report