Impact on clinical outcome of segmental vs diffuse parenchymal thinning in infants with prenatal urinary tract dilation

Authors

  • Siriluck Satonkiatngam Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Atchara Mahayosnond Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.28

Keywords:

urinary tract dilation, parenchymal thinning, differential renal function

Abstract

Objective: To determine the difference in renal function and rate of surgical intervention between neonates with diffuse and segmental parenchymal thinning.

Materials and Methods: First postnatal ultrasonography images of neonates with prenatal urinary tract dilation were evaluated and measurements taken. Neonates with parenchymal thinning were categorised into segmental and diffuse parenchymal thinning groups using the medullary to intermedullary ratio. A statistical correlation of differential renal function and rate of surgical intervention between the two groups was calculated and evaluated using an independent t-test and Kaplan-Meier curve with Log-rank test, respectively.

Results: Of the 20 neonates, 10 had segmental parenchymal thinning, while the other 10 had diffuse parenchymal thinning. Mean differential renal function was 49.3% in the segmental parenchymal thinning group compared to 45.8% in the diffuse group (p = 0.400). Five patients (50%) from the segmental parenchymal thinning group underwent pyeloplasty in comparison to seven patients (70%) from the diffuse group (p = 0.430)

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in renal function or rate of surgical intervention between neonates with segmental parenchymal thinning and diffuse parenchymal thinning. Neonates with segmental parenchymal thinning need to be monitored as closely as those with diffuse parenchymal thinning for early detection of renal deterioration and to identify potential need for surgical intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nguyen HT, Herndon CDA, Cooper C, Gatti J, Kirsch A, Kokorowski P, et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2010; 6:212-31.

Braga LH, McGrath M, Farrokhyar F, Jegatheeswaran K, Lorenzo AJ. Associations of Initial Society for Fetal Urology Grades and Urinary Tract Dilatation Risk Groups with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Isolated Prenatal Hydronephrosis. J Urol 2017;197:831-7.

Nguyen HT, Benson CB, Bromley B, Campbell JB, Chow J, Coleman B, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). J Pediatr Urol 2014;10:982-98.

Hodhod A, Capolicchio JP, Jednak R, El-Sherif E, El-Doray AE-A, El-Sherbiny M. Evaluation of Urinary Tract Dilation Classification System for Grading Postnatal Hydronephrosis. J Urol 2016; 195:725-30.

Passerotti CC, Kalish LA, Chow J, Passerotti AMAMS, Recabal P, Cendron M, et al. The predictive value of the first postnatal ultrasound in children with antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:128-36.

Sibai H, Salle JLP, Houle AM, Lambert R. Hydronephrosis with diffuse or segmental cortical thinning: impact on renal function. J Urol 2001;165:2293-5.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Satonkiatngam, S., & Mahayosnond, A. (2021). Impact on clinical outcome of segmental vs diffuse parenchymal thinning in infants with prenatal urinary tract dilation. Insight Urology, 42(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.28

Issue

Section

Original article