Preliminary study for Application of Grip instead of Penile clamp in local anesthesia before cystoscopy in men

Authors

  • Akachai Sinsophonphap Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Somkiat Pumpaisanchai Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Danaiphand Akarasakul Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Viroj Chittchang Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Vorapot Choonhaklai Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Somsook Kongkitkumthon Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Nattapong Vongwattanastian Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords:

Grip, Penile clamp, Cystoscopy, Local anesthesia, 2% lidocaine jelly, Pain

Abstract

Objective: Penile clamp is medical equipment used to prevent leakage of lidocaine gel from urethra before cystoscopy in men. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of using Grip instead of penile clamp.

Materials and Methods: During April to July, 2008. One hundred and twenty men who were indicated for cystoscopy and accepted the informed consents in Rajavithi Hospital were enrolled in this study and randomly divided into 2 groups; 60 each. In the first group penile clamp were used while in the second group, Grip were used. For comparing between Grip and penile clamp, what we concerned were compression power, capability to prevent lidocaine gel leakage, loss of urethra sensation, patients satisfaction and compli-cations of both groups. Visual analogue scale (VAS 100mm) were used to compare pain in both groups. Statistical significance determined using the Independent-Samples T-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Chi-square test.

Results: Sixty patients were included in each group. The demographic characteristics of the patients did not significantly differ between groups. There were no statistically significant between groups in compres-sion power, capability to prevent lidocaine gel leakage, loss of urethra sensation and patients satisfaction. In addition, complication did not appear in both groups.

Conclusions: In instilling local anesthesia before cystoscopy in men, we can use the application of Grip instead of penile clamp at markly reduced cost.

References

Herbert Leyh, Roger Paul. Urethrocystoscopy. In R. Hohenfellner, J.-U. Stolzenburg. Manual Endourology. New York: Springer, 2005: 17-27.

Donald W. Hinnant Psychological Evaluation and Testing. In: David Tollison. Handbook of Pain management 2 edn. Williams & Baltimore.MD, 1994: 18-35.

Chen YT, Hsiao PJ, Wong WY, Wang CC, Yang SS, Hsieh CH. Randomized double-blind comparison of lidocaine gel and plain lubricating gel in relieving pain during flexible cystoscopy. J Endourol 2005; 19(2): 163-6.

World Health Organization. Cancer pain relief. Geneva: WHO, 1986.

Personal Communication KARL STORZ.

Downloads

Published

2009-06-01

How to Cite

Sinsophonphap, A., Pumpaisanchai, S., Akarasakul, D., Chittchang, V., Choonhaklai, V., Kongkitkumthon, S., & Vongwattanastian, N. (2009). Preliminary study for Application of Grip instead of Penile clamp in local anesthesia before cystoscopy in men. Insight Urology, 30(1), 6–12. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJU/article/view/252483

Issue

Section

Original article