Current concepts in transplant surgery: laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy

Authors

  • Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Chaiyong Nualyong Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Sittiporn Srinualnad Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
  • Teerapon Amornvesukit Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

Keywords:

Laparoscopy, Live donor nephrectomy, safety

Abstract

Objective: The basic idea of introducing laparoscopy in living donor nephrectomy was to obtain a potential reduction in incision-related morbidity while providing at least the same level of operative security. This study is focusing on technical aspects, outcome, results and possible current concerns of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Material and Methods: From January 2001 to December 2006, 115 consecutive patients (56 open and 59 laparoscopy) underwent living donor nephrectomy at Siriraj hospital. The open and laparoscopic procedures were compared in the following categories: patientûs characteristics, surgical outcomes, warm ischemic time and graft function. Here we review the current evidence for laparoscopic donor nephrec- tomy available in the literature.

Results: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was successfully done in 56 (94.9%) cases. The mean operative times (329+51 vs 220+50 minutes, p<0.001) and warm ischemic time (180+74 vs 114+112 seconds, p<0.001) were longer in the laparoscopic than in the open group. However, the mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic than the open group (p=0.018). For the graft outcome, there were 6 (10%) vs 5(9%) instances of slow or delayed graft function among the recipients in laparoscopic vs the open group. One year graft survival rates were comparable between the two groups (94.3% vs 98.2% p=0.80).

Conclusion: According to our results and the results available in the literature, laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy is safe when performed with sufficient experience. However large-scale, prospective comparative studies with adequate follow-up will help to define the exact role of this procedure in renal transplantation.

References

Guild WR, Harrison JH, Merrill JP, Murray J. Successful homotransplantation of the kidney in an identical twin. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 1955-1956; 67: 167-73.

Handschin AE, Weber M, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2003; 90(11): 1323-32.

Tooher RL, Rao MM, Scott DF, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, et al. A systematic review of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2004; 15; 78(3): 404-14.

Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM, Wall DR, Francis DM, Bridgewater FH, et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 2000; 70(12): 1659-66.

Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 60(9): 1047-9.

Subramonian K, DeSylva S, Bishai P, Thompson P, Muir G. Acquiring surgical skills: A comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. Eur. Urol. 2004; 45: 346-51.

Rassweiler JJ, Wiesel M, Carl S, Drehmer I, Jurgowski W, Staehler G. Laparoscopic liver donor nephrectomy. Personal experiences and review of the literature. Urologe A 2001; 40(6): 485-92.

Wadstrom J, Lindstrom P. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: initial 10 cases. Transplantation 2002; 73(11): 1839-1840

Ng CS, Abreu SC, Abou El-Fettouh HI, Kaouk JH, Desai MM, Goldfarb DA, et al. Right retroperitoneal versus left transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2004; 63(5): 857-61.

Ruiz-Deya G, Cheng S, Palmer E, Thomas R, Slakey D. Open donor, laparoscopic donor and hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of outcomes. J Urol 2001; 166(4): 1270-73.

Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB, Delmonico FL. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: survey of United States transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2003; 3(7): 830-34.

Finley DS, Nguyen NT. Surgical robotics. Curr. Surg. 2005; 62: 262-72.

Taweemonkongsap T, Srinualnad S, Amornvesukit T, Pornpong C, Agadmeck S, Nualyong C. Comparable kidney transplant outcomes in laparoscopic vs open living donor nephrectomy: Siriraj experience. The 10th Congress of Asian Society of Transplan- tation 2007 December 1-4; Pattaya, Thailand. Abstract 232.

Martay K, Dembo G, Vater Y, Charpentier K, Levy A, Bakthavatsalam R, et al. Unexpected surgical difficulties leading to hemorrhage and gas embolus during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a case report. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50(9): 891-4.

Boghossian T, Henri M, Dube S, Bendavid Y, Morin M. Laparoscopic nephrectomy donor death due to cerebral gas embolism in a specialized transplant center: risk zero does not exist. Transplantation 2005; 79(2): 258-9.

Najarian JS, Chavers BM, McHugh LE, Matas AJ. 20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet 1992; 340: 807- 10.

Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008; 247(1): 58-70.

Kay MD, Brook N, Kaushik M, Harper SJ, Bagul A, Nicholson ML. Comparison of right and left laparoscopic live donor nephrec- tomy. BJU Int 2006; 98(4): 843-4.

Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR. Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2003; 61(2): 323-7.

Oh HK, Hawasli A, Cousins G. Management of renal allografts with multiple renal arteries resulting from laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Clin Transplant 2003; 17(4): 353-7.

Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, Campbell DA Jr, Magee JC, Punch JD, et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72(2): 284-90.

Kok NF, Lind MY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Borg IR, Knipscheer BC, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333(7561): 221.

Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 2000; 164(5): 1494-9.

Leventhal JR, Deeik RK, Joehl RJ, Rege RV, Herman CH, Fryer JP, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy-is it safe? Transplantation 2000; 70(4): 602-6.

Rawlins MC, Hefty TL, Brown SL, Biehl TR. Learning laparoscopic donor nephrectomy safely: a report on 100 cases. Arch Surg 2002; 137(5): 531-4.

Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 2018-21.

Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini Moghaddam SM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2005; 95: 851-5.

Shokeir, AA. Open Versus Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Focus on the Safety of Donors and the Need for a Donor Registry. J Urol 2007; 178(5): 1860-6.

Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Koffron A, Kuo PC, Leventhal J, et al. Surgical techniques in right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 195(1): 31-7.

Simon SD, Castle EP, Ferrigni RG, Lamm DL, Swanson SK, Novicki DE, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy: the Mayo clinic experience. J Urol 2004; 171(4): 1447-50.

Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience. J Urol 2004; 171(1): 47-51.

Abreu SC, Goldfarb DA, Derweesh I, Modlin C, Krishnamurthi V, Novick AC, et al. Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 52-7.

Oyen O, Anderson M, Mathisen L, Krarstein G, Edwin B, Line PD, Scholz T, Pfeffer PF. Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79(9): 1236-40.

Kok NF, Weimar W, Alwayn IP, Ijzermans JN. The current practice of live donor nephrectomy in Europe. Transplantation. 2006 Oct 15; 82(7): 892-7.

Finelli FC, Góngora E, Sasaki TM, Light JA. A survey: the prevalence of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy at large U.S. transplant centers. Transplantation. 2001 Jun 27; 71(12): 1862-4.

Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Jarrett TW, Trock BJ, Sinkov V, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2): 358-63.

Ratner LE, Hiller J, Sroka M, Weber R, Sikorsky I, Montgomery RA, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy removes disincen- tives to live donation. Transplant Proc. 1997 Dec; 29(8): 3402-3.

Downloads

Published

2008-12-01

How to Cite

Taweemonkongsap, T., Nualyong, C., Srinualnad, S., & Amornvesukit, T. (2008). Current concepts in transplant surgery: laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Insight Urology, 29(2), 43–52. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJU/article/view/252930

Issue

Section

Original article