First implantation: preparation, setup and implantation for malleable penile prosthesis

Authors

  • Dechapol Buranapitaksanti Kasemrad Ramkhamhaeng Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.93

Keywords:

Implantation, preparation, set up, malleable, penile prosthesis

Abstract

Treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) is becoming more common in Thailand. The spectrum of treatment varies from non-invasive techniques such as medication, to counseling for invasive treatment such as injection and finally to penile prosthesis implantation. As the demand for penile implant surgery increases it is increasingly crucial to ensure thorough preparation and patient care in order to minimize the risk of harmful complications, for example device infection. This review article aims to provide guidance on various aspects of the surgical process, including pre- and intra-operative patient preparation, essential equipment and supplies, and step-by- step surgical techniques. It also offers key pointers for post-operative care. This article may be valuable for those looking to start performing penile prosthesis surgery or for those seeking to improve their current practices. Literature was reviewed from PubMed and Google scholar databases. This article provides crucial information on patient selection, pre-operative counseling, surgical setup and technique, and post-operative care for malleable penile prosthesis implantation. A penile prosthesis is an excellent option for men with refractory ED as opposed to medical treatment or with contraindications to medical management. However, this operation is still relatively uncommon in Thailand. Malleable prostheses offer advantages including being cost-effective, having a low risk of malfunction, and being easier to implant in comparison to inflatable implants. This review aims to encourage, reassure, and convince new implanters to complete all spectrums of ED treatment.

References

McMahon CN, Smith CJ, Shabsigh R. Treating erectile dysfunction when PDE5 inhibitors fail. BMJ 2006;332:589-92.

Albersen M, Mwamukonda KB, Shindel AW, Lue TF. Evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Med Clin North Am 2011;95:201-12.

Mulhall JP, Giraldi A, Hackett G, Hellstrom WJG, Jannini EA, Rubio-Aurioles E, et al. The 2018 Revision to the Process of Care Model for Management of Erectile Dysfunction. J Sex Med 2018;15:1434-45.

Boronat TF. Penile prosthesis: Patient satisfaction, use and preference for malleable vs inflatable. World J Clin Urol 2014;3:134-8.

Yavuz U, Ciftci S, Ustuner M, Yilmaz H, Culha M. Surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease using malleable prosthesis. Urol J 2015;12:2428-33.

Habous M, Omar M, Farag M, Abdelwahab O, Laban O, Binsaleh S, et al. Malleable penile implant rod diameter predicts complications and patient satisfaction. Sex Med 2022;10:100486.

Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int 2006;97:129-33.

Levine LA, Estrada CR, Morgentaler A. Mechanical reliability, safety and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a two center study. J Urol 2001;166:932-7.

Montague DK. Periprosthetic infections. J Urol 1987;138:68-9.

Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ. Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987;138:65-7.

Wilson SK, Delk JR. Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995;153:659-61.

Devici S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol 2007;51:1128-31.

Bertero EB, Antunes DL. Surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. Sex Med Rev 2015;3:316-27.

Mulcahy JJ, Austoni E, Barada JH, Choi HK, Hellstrom WJG, Krishnamurti S, et al. The penile implant for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2004;1:98-109.

Miller LE, Khera M, Bhattacharyya S, Patel M, Nitschelm K, Burnett AL. Long-Term Survival Rates of Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urology 2022;166:6-10.

Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Soliman T, Nassar M, Mekai Z, et al. Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection. BJU Int 2018;121:293-300.

Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ, et al. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol 2008;179:1379-90.

Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97-132.

Aly R, Maibach HI. Comparative antibacterial efficacy of a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and chloroxylenol sponge-brushes. Am J Infect Control 1988;16:173-7.

Eid JF, Wilson SK, Cleves M, Salem EA. Coated implants and “no touch” surgical technique decreases risk of infection in inflatable penile prosthesis implantation to 0.46%. Urology 2012;79:1310-5.

O’Farrell DA, Kenny G, O’Sullivan M, Nicholson P, Stephens M, Hone R. Evaluation of the optimal hand-scrub duration prior to total hip arthroplasty. J Hosp Infect 1994;26:93-8.

Trost LW, Boonjindasup AG, Hellstrom WJ. Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report. Int J Impot Res 2015;27:86-9.

Falagas ME, Vergidis PI. Irrigation with antibiotic-containing solutions for the prevention and treatment of infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:862-7.

Chung E. State-of-art review of current malleable penile prosthesis devices in the commercial market. Ther Adv Urol 2023;15:1-7.

Caso J, Keating M, Miranda-Sousa A, Carrion R. Ventral phalloplasty. Asian J Androl 2010;10:155-7.

Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Siegel A, Seftel AD, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed suction drainage of the scrotum in three piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res 2005;17:535-8.

Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, et al. Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Buranapitaksanti, D. . (2024). First implantation: preparation, setup and implantation for malleable penile prosthesis. Insight Urology, 45(2), 110–6. https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.93

Issue

Section

Review article