Comparison of enucleation efficiency of HoLEP with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between the learning curve period and after becoming proficient in HoLEP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.89Keywords:
Enucleation, HoLEP, En Bloc, learning curve, proficiencyAbstract
Objective: To compare prostate enucleation efficiency using Holmium laser (HoLEP) with the early apical release ‘En Bloc’ technique between a learning curve and experienced group and to evaluate factors required to ensure proficiency.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who underwent En Bloc HoLEP with early apical release by a single surgeon (CL) at Thammasat University Hospital between January 2019 and December 2023. The primary outcome was a comparison of enucleation efficiency (EE). EE was calculated by dividing the weight of enucleated prostatic tissue (g) by the enucleation time (min). Secondary outcomes were hematocrit (Hct) change, one-month postoperative maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) reduction, catheter time (CT; day), length of hospital stay (LOS; day), morcellation efficiency (ME; calculate by dividing enucleated tissue weight (grams) by the morcellation time) and post-operative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) occurrence. The 120 cases were divided into a learning curve group of 60 cases and an experienced group of 60 cases. Mean EE & ME, post-operative Hct change, IPSS reduction, Qmax, CT, LOS and post-operative SUI were compared.
Results: The median (IQR) prostate weight in the learning curve group vs the experienced group was 66 (50.5-101) g vs 69 (50-95) g. Demographic and clinical data differed significantly between groups. Mean EE was significantly different between the learning curve group vs the experienced group (0.76 g/min vs 0.92 g/min (p = 0.021), respectively) after experience of 60 cases. Mean CT and LOS were decreased in the experienced group. Mean ME improved slightly but was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The number of cases required to become proficient at the early apical released En Bloc technique of HoLEP is 60 cases.
References
Taube M, Gajraj H. Trial without catheter following acute retention of urine. Br J Urol 1989;63:180-2.
Borth CS, Nickel JC. Management of spontaneous prostate related bleeding, AUA Update Ser 25 2006; Lesson 1.
Sarmina I, Resnick MI. Obstructive uropathy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, J Urol 1989;141:866-9.
Yin L, Teng J, Huang CJ, Zhang X, Xu D. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endourol 2013;27:604-11.
Gilling PJ, Wilson LC, King CJ, Westenberg AM, Frampton CM, Fraundorfer MR. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years. BJU Int 2012;109:408-11.
Michalak J, Tzou D, Funk J. HoLEP. the gold standard for the surgical management of BPH in the 21(st) Century. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2015;3:36-42.
Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, Suardi N, Briganti A, Zanoni M, et al. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;172:1926-9.
Hurle R, Vavassori I, Piccinelli A, Manzetti A, Valenti S, Vismara A. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation in 155 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 2002;60:449-53.
Glybochko PV, Rapoport LM, Enikeev ME, Enikeev DV. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia: tips and tricks. Urologia 2017;84:169-73.
Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Malcolm AR, Fraundorfer MR. Combination holmium and Nd:YAG laser ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 1995;9:151-3.
Riedinger CB, Fantus RJ, Matulewicz RS, Werntz RP, Rodriguez JF, Smith ND. The impact of surgical duration on complications after transurethral resection of the prostate: an analysis of NSQIP data. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2019;22:303-8.
Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, Peters PC. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 1989;141:243-7.
Haridas M, Malangoni MA. Predictive factors for surgical site infection in general surgery. Surgery 2008;144:496-503.
Matulewicz RS, Sharma V, McGuire BB, Oberlin DT, Perry KT, Nadler RB. The effect of surgical duration of transurethral resection of bladder tumors on postoperative complications: An analysis of ACS NSQIP data. Urol Oncol 2015;33:338.e19-24.
Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB. General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:60-5.e1-2.
Boxall NE, Georgiades F, Miah S, Dragos L, Armitage J, Aho TF. A call for HoLEP: AEEP for mega-prostates (≥ 200 cc). World J Urol 2021;39:2347-53.
Thaidumrong T, Duangkae S, Jiramanee V, Kalapong J, Pisansalhidikam P, Tuipae K. Transurethral anatomical enucleation of prostate (TUAEP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia with bipolar system: first study in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2019;102:20.
Saitta G, Becerra JEA, Del Álamo JF, González LL, Elbers JR, Suardi N, et al. ‘En Bloc’ HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 2019;37:2451-8.
Dr. Fernando Gómez Sancha. En Bloc HoLEP with early apical liberation [video]. 2019 Feb 13 [cited 2024 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTdCXGjgPZo
Seki N, Mochida O, Kinukawa N, Sagiyama K, Naito S. Holmium laser enucleation for prostatic adenoma: analysis of learning curve over the course of 70 consecutive cases. J Urol 2003;170:1847-50.
Shah HN, Mahajan AP, Sodha HS, Hegde S, Mohile PD, Bansal MB. Prospective evaluation of the learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Urol 2007;177:1468-74.
Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol 2007;52:1465-71.
Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol 2015;67:1066-96.
Bae J, Oh SJ, Paick JS. The learning curve for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a single-center experience. Korean J Urol 2010;51:688-93.
Robert G, Cornu JN, Fourmarier M, Saussine C, Descazeaud A, Azzouzi AR, et al. Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). BJU Int 2016;117:495-9.
Peyronnet B, Robert G, Comat V, Rouprêt M, Gomez-Sancha F, Cornu JN, Misrai V. Learning curves and perioperative outcomes after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a comparison between GreenLight 532-nm and holmium lasers. World J Urol 2017;35:973-83.
Brunckhorst O, Ahmed K, Nehikhare O, Marra G, Challacombe B, Popert R. Evaluation of the learning curve for Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate using multiple outcome measures. Urology 2015;86:824-9.
Wang X, Chen G, Wu P, Ben L, Liu Q, Wang J. The en bloc method is feasible for beginners learning to perform holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Transl Androl Urol 2023;12:477-86.
Wenk MJ, Hartung FO, Egen L, Netsch C, Kosiba M, Grüne B, et al. The long-term learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in the en-bloc technique: a single surgeon series of 500 consecutive cases. World J Urol 2024;42:436.
Rücker F, Lehrich K, Böhme A, Zacharias M, Ahyai SA, Hansen J. A call for HoLEP: en-bloc vs. two-lobe vs. three-lobe. World J Urol 2021;39:2337-45.
Tamalunas A, Schott M, Keller P, Atzler M, Ebner B, Hennenberg M, et al. Efficacy, efficiency, and safety of En-bloc vs three-lobe enucleation of the prostate: a propensity score-matched analysis. Urology 2023;175:48-55.
Press B, Ghiraldi E, Kim DD, Nair H, Johnson K, Kellner D. “En-Bloc” Enucleation with early apical release compared to standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a retrospective pilot study during the initial learning curve of a single surgeon. Urology 2022;165:275-9.
El-Hakim A, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can be taught: the first learning experience. BJU Int 2002;90:863-9.
Monn MF, El Tayeb M, Bhojani N, Mellon MJ, Sloan JC, Boris RS, et al. Predictors of enucleation and morcellation time during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. Urology 2015;86:338-42.
Franz J, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Pütz P, Sigle A, Lusuardi L, Netsch C, et al. Morcellation after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: efficiency and safety of currently available devices. Eur Urol Focus 2022;8:532-44.
Ito T, Tamura K, Otsuka A, Shinbo H, Takada S, Kurita Y, et al. Development of a complete en-bloc technique with direct bladder neck incision: a newly modified approach for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol 2019;33:835-40.
Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Fallara G, Schifano N, Costa A, Candela L, et al. Reply to: Grosso AA, Tuccio A, Salvi M, Paganelli D, Minervini A, and Di Maida F’s Letter to the Editor re: Capogrosso P, Ventimiglia E, Fallara G, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate is associated with complications and sequelae even in the hands of an experienced surgeon following completion of the learning curve. Eur Urol Focus 2023:S2405-4569(23)00148-7.
Werneburg GT. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: current challenges and future prospects. Res Rep Urol 2022;14:109-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Insight Urology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
