External validation of Stone Probability Score for screening Loei urolithiasis patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.91Keywords:
External validation, predictive model, probability stone formation, stone probability score, screening urolithiasis patientsAbstract
Objective: Urolithiasis is prevalent in Thailand, particularly in Loei region. Early detection is vital for effective management. In 2022, Santanapipatkul et al. developed a Stone Probability Score for screening urolithiasis patients at Loei, however, external validation of this predictive model is necessary to ensure its reliability and applicability. The objective of this study is to externally validate the Stone Probability Score for Screening Urolithiasis Patients at Loei developed in 2022.
Materials and Methods: The external validation was conducted using cross-sectional data from urolithiasis patients at Loei Hospital between June 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. Logistic regression analysis was employed to evaluate the performance of the predictive model with regard to discrimination, calibration, and multicollinearity.
Results: This validation study included 347 patients and an accuracy of 92.6% (95%CI 88.9-96.3) was achieved with an AUC pertinent to discrimination measurement resulting in a sensitivity of 96.9% (95%CI 94.2-98.6), a specificity of approximately 53.4 % (95%CI 39.9-66.7), positive predictive value of 91.2% (95%CI 87.5-94.1) and negative predictive value of 77.5% (95%CI 61.5-89.2). The performance of the model was found to be consistent after external validation in three models in comparison with the previous study.
Conclusion: The external validation of SPS for Screening Loei Urolithiasis Patients exhibited excellent discrimination and calibration. The overall performance of the models was validated with high accuracy. This model can be used as a screening tool to identify individuals at risk of developing urolithiasis in the Loei region.
References
Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, Soga N, Kameda K, Sriboonlue P, et al.Incidenceofurolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol 1997;4:537-40.
Goldfarb DS, Arowojolu O. Metabolic evaluation of first-time and recurrent stone formers. Urol Clin North Am 2013;40:13-20.
Santanapipatkul K, Jantakun W. Development and validation of a score for the screening of Loei urolithiasis patients. Insight Urol 2022;43:13-24.
Levey AS, Eckardt K, Tsukamoto Y, Levin A, Coresh J, Rossert J, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: A position statement from Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int 2005;67:2089-100.
Santanapipatkul K, Jantakun W, Tanthanuch M. Urinary tract stone analysis in Loei province. Thai J Urol 2019;40:9-18.
Eisner BH, Goldfarb DS. A nomogram for the prediction of kidney stone recurrence. J Am Soc Nephrol 2014;25:2685-7.
Rule AD, Lieske JC, Li X, Melton LJ 3rd, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ. The ROKS nomogram for predicting a second symptomatic stone episode. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25:2878-86.
Okita K, Hatakeyama S, Imai A, Tanaka T, Hamano I, Okamoto T, et al. Stone episode prediction: development and validation of the prediction nomogram for urolithiasis. Int J Urol 2020;27:344-9.
Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B, Luo D, Wang K, Li H, et al. Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol 2018;5:205-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Insight Urology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.