Complications of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients with urinary tract infection

Authors

  • Ornsinee Senkhum Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Sisaket Hospital, Sisaket, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.112

Keywords:

Ureteric calculi, ureteroscopy, lithotripsy, urosepsis, SIRS, complication

Abstract

Objective: To study the risk of complications associated with ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients with urinary tract infection.

Materials and Methods: 420 patients who underwent ureteroscopy with lithotripsy from March 2022 to March 2024 in Sisaket Hospital were enrolled onto this study. Data pertinent to baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, successful outcome and associated complications were collected retrospectively. The efficacy of the procedure, including complications, length of hospital stay, and pain score, was analyzed and comparisons were made between patients with and without sepsis.

Results: 89 patients were categorized as being in the sepsis group, and 331 patients in the non-sepsis group. The average age in the sepsis group was 51.2 years and patients in the non-sepsis group were slightly older at 55.56 years. 58.43% of the sepsis group had no underlying disease, and 56.19% of the non-sepsis group (p = 0.706). There was no significant difference betweentotal complications in the sepsis and non-sepsis group at 24.72% and 18.73% respectively (p = 0.221). The most common complication was post-operative fever. There were no serious complication in the sepsis group. The mean hospital stay in the sepsis group was 3.99 days, which is significantly higher than in the non-sepsis or controlgroup, which was 2.94 days (p = 0.002). The pain score in the sepsis was significantly higher than in the controls.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that the postoperative complications of URSL in a non-sepsis group are comparable to the sepsis group. But sepsis increased the length of hospital stay and resulted in higher postoperative pain. The definitive treatment with URSL is safe for ureteric stone in mild sepsis patients. However, further large comparative studies with adequate follow-up stone clearance are recommended to support our results.

References

Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 2017;35:1301-20.

Tanthanuch M, Apiwatgaroon A, Pripatnanont C. Urinary tract calculi in southern Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai 2005;88:80-5.

Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T, Soga N, Kameda K, Sriboonlue P, Prasongwattana V, Borwornpadungkitti S. Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol 1997;4:537-40.

Bhojani N, Miller LE, Bhattacharyya S, Cutone B, Chew BH. Risk Factors for Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. J Endourol 2021;35:991-1000.

JiaLe Sun, JiangNan Xu, Jun OuYang. Risk factors of infectious complications following ureteroscopy:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 2020;104:113-24.

Bonkat G, Bartoletti R, Bruyere F, Cai T, Geerlings SE, Koves B, et al. EAU Guidelines on Urological Infections [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 1]. Aval- iable from: EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Milan 2023. ISBN 978-94-92671-19-6.

Bakr M, Abdelhalim KM. Safety and efficacy of emergency ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients presented with urinary tract infection with mild sepsis. J Endourol 2020;34:262-6.

Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:762-74.

Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, McGloughlin S, Maclsaac C, Bellomo R, Pilcher DV, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA Score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA 2017;317:290-300.

Wang C, Xu R, Zeng Y, Zhao Y, Hu X. A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2022;17:e0266755.

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med 2021;47:1181-47.

Laih CY, Hsiao PJ, Hsieh PF, Wang YD, Lai CM, Yang CT, et al. QSOFA and SOFA scores are valuable tools for predicting postoperative sepsis resulting from ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL). Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101(50):e31765

Kronstedt S, Katz JE, Sur RL. Antibiotic Therapy for Common Stone Procedures: What is the optimal duration?. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Avaliable from: https://auanews.net/issues/ articles/2022/november-2022/antibiotic-therapy-for-common-stone-procedures-what-is-the-op-timal-duration

Pauchard F, Ventimiglia E, Corrales M, Traxer O. A Practical guide for intra-renal temperature and pressure management during rirs: What is the evidence telling us. J Clin Med 2022;11:3429.

Picozzi SC, Ricci C, Gaeta M, Casellato S, Stubinski R, Bozzini G, et al. Urgent ureteroscopy as first-line treatment for ureteral stones: a meta-analysis of 681 patients. Urol Res 2012;40:581-6.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Senkhum, O. (2025). Complications of ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy in patients with urinary tract infection. Insight Urology, 46(2), 112–8. https://doi.org/10.52786/isu.a.112

Issue

Section

Original article