Optimization of DNA Extraction from Blood Samples Contaminated with Clay Using Additive Reagents

Authors

  • Khwansuda Thavorn -Graduate Program in Forensic Science, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University
  • Tayawee Romgaew Central Police Forensic Science, Office of Police Forensic Science, Royal Thai Police
  • Anek Pootong Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University
  • Sunisa Aobaom Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University

Keywords:

DNA extraction, clay soil, additive reagent, forensic genetics

Abstract

Background : Clay-contaminated blood samples present a significant challenge for forensic DNA analysis. The composition and chemical properties of clay soil, which is abundant in minerals and possess a high DNA adsorption capacity, often lead to a reduction in the efficiency of DNA extraction and PCR amplification. These issues pose a major obstacle in forensic genetic identification.

Objective : To compare the efficiency of additive reagents used in combination with a commercial DNA extraction kit in extracting human DNA from clay-contaminated blood samples.

Material and methods : DNA was extracted from blood samples contaminated with clay using a commercial DNA extraction kit with the addition of one of the following additive reagents, including Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), Potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (KH2PO4), Skim milk, and Nuclease free water, during the cell lysis step. The efficiency of each additive was subsequently compared with the control group based on the quantity of DNA extracted, which was measured using Real-time PCR.

Results : The additive KH2PO4 yielded the highest amount of extracted DNA with statistical significance (p < 0.05) compared to the other additives and the control group, followed by SDS and Skim milk, respectively.  Furthermore, assessment of DNA samples quality, using the Internal PCR control (IPC), indicated that KH2PO4, SDS, and Skim milk could reduce the effects of soil-derived inhibitors that may be co-extracted with DNA during the extraction process, such inhibitors can negatively impact the efficiency of the PCR reaction.

Conclusion : KH2PO4is the most effective additive for increasing the yield of extracted DNA and mitigating the inhibitory effects of soil-derived substances in DNA samples. Therefore, it is a suitable choice for the extraction of DNA from blood samples contaminated with clay soil.

References

Young JM, Rawlence NJ, Weyrich LS, Cooper A. Limitations and recommendations for successful DNA extraction from forensic soil samples: a review. Sci Justice. 2014;54(3):238-44.

Saeki K, Sakai M. The influence of soil organic matter on DNA adsorptions on andosols. Microbes Environ. 2009;24(2):175-9.

Pietramellara G, Ascher J, Borgogni F, Ceccherini MT, Guerri G, Nannipieri P. Extracellular DNA in soil and sediment: fate and ecological relevance. Biol Fertil Soils. 2009;45(3):219-35.

Howarth A, Drummond B, Wasef S, Matheson CD. An assessment of DNA extraction methods from blood-stained soil in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;341:111502.

Barbaro A, Cormaci P, La Marca A. DNA extraction from soil by EZ1 advanced XL (Qiagen). Forensic Sci Int. 2019;299:161-7.

Hirashima H, Hisazumi R, Mason MLT, Yamamoto A, Saeki Y. Development of an effective method of human DNA extraction from soil as forensic evidence. Forensic Sci Int. 2022;335:111284.

Guerra V, Beule L, Lehtsaar E, Liao H-L, Karlovsky P. Improved protocol for DNA extraction from subsoils using phosphate lysis buffer. buffer. Microorganisms. 2020;8(4):532.

Wang H, Qi J, Xiao D, Wang Z, Tian K. A re-evaluation of dilution for eliminating PCR inhibition in soil DNA samples. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;106:109-18.

Wichachai S. Forensic Analysis of Soil Samples by Using Energy DispersiveX-Ray Fluorescence. JCFS. 2023;9(1):157-70.

Yankson KK, Steck TR. Strategy for extracting DNA from clay soil and detecting a specific target sequence via selective enrichment and real-time (quantitative) PCR amplification. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(18):6017-21.

Ogram A, Sayler GS, Gustin D, Lewis RJ. DNA adsorption to soils and sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 1988;22(8):982-4.

Crecchio C, Stotzky G. Binding of DNA on humic acids: Effect on transformation of Bacillus subtilis and resistance to DNase. Soil Biol Biochem. 1998;30(8):1061-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-18

How to Cite

1.
Thavorn K, Romgaew T, Pootong A, Aobaom S. Optimization of DNA Extraction from Blood Samples Contaminated with Clay Using Additive Reagents. TUHJ [internet]. 2025 Jul. 18 [cited 2025 Dec. 26];10(2):219-2. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TUHJ/article/view/274752

Issue

Section

บทความวิจัย