Main Article Content
t is difficult to fully cover the wound in extensive deep burn cases. Conventional skin grafting cannot resolve the problem if the donor site is limited and is much smaller than the recipient site. The Meek micro stamp skin grafting was introduced to Thailand in 2015 and we used this technique on 2 patients. The first patient had a 55% body surface area burn, as a result of a high voltage electrical injury as well as an inhalation injury. The second patient had an 80% body surface area burn, with an inhalation injury. The result is we required smaller donor sites than in a conventional case. Mesh skin grafts and complications such as a graft not taken, wound infection and cosmetic result was comparable to the conventional mesh graft technique.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
2. Tanner JC Jr, Vandeput J, Olley JF. The mesh skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1964;34:287-92.
3. Kreis RW, Mackie DP, Vloemans AWFP, et al. Widely expanded postage stamp skin grafts using a modified Meek technique in combination with an allograft overlay. Burns 1993;19:142-5.
4. Humica Skin Transplantation Technology. MEEK Micrografting. (Accessed June 7, 2017, at: http://www.humeca.com/meek/).
5. Osler T, Glance LG, Hosmer DW. Simplified estimates of the probability of death after burn injuries: extending and updating the baux score. J Trauma 2010;68(3):690-7.