Outcome of Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic and duodenal ulcer, Kalasin Hospital

Authors

  • Kittiporn Klincachorn -

Keywords:

Peptic ulcer, Peptic ulcer perforation, Laparoscopy

Abstract

          Owing to advancements in surgical technique, laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a substitutional treatment for conventional open surgical repair because of less postoperative pain, reduced length of hospital stay, and early recovery. This retrospective descriptive study was conducted to demonstrate the outcomes of laparoscopic repair of peptic and duodenal ulcer perforation in Kalasin Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. There were 20 enrollment cases. Data were reviewed and recorded by medical form and analyzed using descriptive statistics including percent, average, median, and standard deviation. For the results, the average operative time was 81.00 ± 21.92 minute, the most common procedure was trocar applied 3 ports (90%), 11 cases (55%) had a moderate degree of intra-abdominal contamination and estimated blood loss was 10 ml. (Q1-Q3: 5.5-10). No one underwent re-operation. Immediate post-operative complication was found in 1 case (5%) due to pneumonia, and the patient was against advice to treat. There were 2 patients (10%) who required a ventilator and ICU stay. Length of hospital stay was 6 days (Q1-Q3: 5.5 - 7). 19 patients (95%) were discharged with approval. After operative for 8 weeks, all patients were evaluated by EGD scope and mucosal biopsy. 11 patients had H. pylori infection (55%) and 8 patients had chronic ulcer (40%). Laparoscopic repair is an effective and feasible choice of perforated peptic/duodenal ulcer treatment pragmatical in center with specialists and appropriate devices.

References

Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. AmFam Physician 2007; 76:1005-12.

Zelickson MS, Bronder CM, Johnson BL, et al. Helicobacter pylori is not the predominant etiology for peptic ulcers requiring operation. Am Surg 2011; 77:105.

Walsh JH, Peterson WL. The treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in the management of peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 333:984-91.

Childs S, Roberts A, Meineche-Schmidt V, de Wit N, Rubin G. The management of Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care: a systematic review of the literature. Fam Pract 2000; 17 Suppl 2:6-11.

McQuaid KR, Isenberg JI. Medical therapy of peptic ulcer disease. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72:285-316.

Chung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer an update. World J Gastro-intest Surg 2017:9:1.

Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:1231-9.

Lau JY, Sung J, Hill C, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality. Digestion 2011; 84:102-13.

Bas G, Eryilmaz R, Okan I, et al. Risk Factors of Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Acta Chir Belg 2008; 108:42.

Kim HC, Yang DM, Kim SW, et al. Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time. Eur Radiol 2014;24.

Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. AmFam Physician 2007; 76:1005-12.

Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, FungKH. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002; 235:313-9.

Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet 2015; 386:12.

Ng EK, Lam YH, Sung JJ, Yung MY, To KF, Chan AC. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori prevents re-currence of ulcer after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation: randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2000; 231:153-8.

Bucher P, Oulhaci W, Morel P, Ris F, Huber O. Results of conservative treatment for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in patients not eligible for surgical repair. Swiss Med Wkly 2007; 137:337-40.

Dent TL. Training, credentialing, and evaluation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1992; 72:1003-11.

Soper NJ, Brunt LM, Kerbl K. Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:409-19.

Mouret P, François Y, Vignal J, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1990; 77:1006.

Lee FY, Leung KL, Lai BS, et al. Predicting mortality and morbidity of patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcers. Arch Surg 2001; 136:90-4.

Kitridis, D., Tsikopoulos, K., Givissis, P & Chalidis, B. Mortality and complication rates in nonagenarians and octogenarians undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Geriatr Med. 2023; 13(3):725-733. doi: 10.1007/s41999-022-00610-y

มลฤดี มาลา. ปัจจัยที่มีความสัมพันธ์ต่อการเกิดภาวะแทรกซ้อนในระบบหัวใจและหลอดเลือดระหว่างให้ยาระงับความรู้สึกในผู้ป่วยสูงอายุ. วารสารเครือข่ายวิทยาลัยพยาบาลและการสาธารณสุขภาคใต้. 2558; 2(3); 92-102.

Huang Y, Wang QL, Cheng DD, et al. Adhesion and Invasion of Gastric Mucosa Epithelial Cells by Helicobacter pylori. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016;6:159

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

1.
Klincachorn K. Outcome of Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic and duodenal ulcer, Kalasin Hospital. JKKPHO [internet]. 2024 Jun. 21 [cited 2026 Feb. 16];6(2):e268237. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jkkpho/article/view/268237