Correlation Between Medial Margin-to-Midline Distance in Decompressive Craniectomy and Postoperative Hydrocephalus

Main Article Content

Sittinon Sangkharo, M.D.
Plt.Off. Tanabat Somboonsub, M.D.
Wg.Cdr. Anupharp Pankhongsap, M.D.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether decompressive craniectomy with a distance to the midline (DTM) of 2.5 cm. is associated with post-craniectomy hydrocephalus in patients with traumatic brain injury and stroke, and to determine the optimal DTM cut-off value with the highest specificity for predicting post-craniectomy hydrocephalus.


Method: A retrospective analysis study was conducted on patients who were diagnosed with traumatic brain injury, ischemic infarction and hemorrhagic stroke who underwent decompressive craniectomy. A 3D reconstruction CT scan was used to determine the DTM and follow up post-operative hydrocephalus.


Results: In 109 patients, the mean DTM was significantly shorter in the post-craniectomy hydrocephalus group (2.07+0.89 cm) compared to the non-hydrocephalus group (2.48+1.12 mm; P=0.033). Univariate analysis showed that DTM <2.5 cm was associated with hydrocephalus (crude OR=2.39; 95% CI: 1.10–5.28; P=0.029). However, after adjusting for potential confounders (age, post-operative GCS, ICH, infection, evacuation, and IVH) using multiple logistic regression, DTM was not an independent predictor of hydrocephalus (adjusted OR=2.17; 95% CI: 0.85–5.68; P=0.107). Significant independent risk factors identified were age (P=0.013) and intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.044). We found the maximum specificity cut-point found that interval more or less than 1.64 centimeters, so that more incidence of hydrocephalus. However, adjusted for this by multiple logistic regression, found no significant difference between the interval of midline and margin of craniectomy and the occurrence of hydrocephalus.


Conclusion: While a medial margin-to-midline distance (DTM) of <2.5 cm showed an initial association with hydrocephalus in univariate analysis, it was not identified as an independent risk factor in the multivariable model. Advanced age and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) are the primary independent predictors of post-craniectomy hydrocephalus. Clinical risk assessment should prioritize these patient-related factors alongside surgical considerations.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sangkharo, S., Somboonsub, T., & Pankhongsap, A. (2026). Correlation Between Medial Margin-to-Midline Distance in Decompressive Craniectomy and Postoperative Hydrocephalus. Royal Thai Air Force Medical Gazette, 72(2), 50–66. retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rtafmg/article/view/279996
Section
Original Articles

References

Ovenden CD, Barot DD, Gupta A, et al. Incidence of hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023;234:107989.

Di G, Hu Q, Liu D, et al. Risk factors predicting posttraumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e406-e413.

Pan J, Feroze AH, McGrath M, et al. Incidence and risk model of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in patients with traumatic brain injury. World Neurosurg. 2024.

Heinonen A, Rauhala M, Isokuortti H, et al. Incidence of surgically treated post-traumatic hydrocephalus 6 months following head injury in patients undergoing acute head computed tomography. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022;164(7):2357-65.

Zhuo J, Zhang W, Xu Y, et al. Nomogram for predicting post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022;68(1):37-43.

Hu Q, Di G, Shao X, et al. Predictors associated with post-traumatic hydrocephalus in patients with head injury undergoing unilateral decompressive craniectomy. Front Neurol. 2018;9:337.

Salik I, Vazquez S, Syal A, et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive hemicraniectomy in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury. J NeurosurgPediatr. 2023;31(5):417-22.

Fischer D, Edlow BL. Coma prognostication after acute brain injury: A review. JAMA Neurol. Published online March 4, 2024.

Kim H, Lee HS, Ahn SY, et al. Factors associated with postoperative hydrocephalus in patients with traumatic acute subdural hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(6):730-7.

Lawton MT. Lawton’s Seven Aneurysms: Tenets and techniques for clipping. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(6):1774-9.

De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, Rigante L, Anile C. Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy: an underestimated risk factor. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(11):1965–70.

Honeybul S, Ho KM. Incidence and risk factors for post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for intractable intracranial hypertension and evacuation of mass lesions. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(10):1872–8.

Kammersgaard LP, Linnemann M, Tibaek M. Hydrocephalus following severe traumatic brain injury in adults: incidence, timing, and clinical predictors during rehabilitation. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;33(3):473–80.

Bae IS, Kim JM, Cheong JH, et al. Does the skull Hounsfield unit predict shunt dependent hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma? PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232631.

Nasi D, Gladi M, Di Rienzo A, et al. Risk factors for post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(9):1731–9.

Katiyar V, Dharanipathy S, Gurjar H, Vora Z, Sharma R. Post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy: how well can it be predicted? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018;160(11):2259–60.

Kim JH, Ahn JH, Oh JK, et al. Factors associated with the development and outcome of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(1):471–8.

Williams JR, Meyer RM, Ricard JA, et al. Re-examining decompressive craniectomy medial margin distance from midline as a metric for calculating the risk of post-traumatic hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;87:125–31.

Jesuyajolu DA, Moti T, Zubair AA, et al. Factors associated with post traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy: A single-center experience. Surg Neurol Int. 2023;14(18):1–5.

Peresada S, Shkarupa M, Doroshkevich S, et al. Correlation between medial margin-to-midline distance in decompressive craniectomy and posttraumatic hydrocephalus: Where do we stand? Neurochirurgie. 2023;69:101436.

Akins PT, Guppy KH. Are hygromas and hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy caused by impaired brain pulsatility, cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics, and glymphatic drainage? Literature overview and illustrative cases. World Neurosurg. 2019;130:e1–e12.

De Bonis P, Sturiale CL, Anile C, et al. Decompressive craniectomy, interhemispheric hygroma and hydrocephalus: A timeline of events? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(8):1308–12.

Ding J, Guo Y, Tian H. The influence of decompressive craniectomy on the development of hydrocephalus: A review. ArqNeuropsiquiatr. 2014;72(9):715–20.

Serban N-L, Florian IS, Florian IA, et al. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus as a complication of decompressive craniectomy–same old story, new perspectives. Front Surg. 2024;11:1415938.

Takeuchi S, Nawashiro H, Wada K, et al. Ventriculomegaly after decompressive craniectomy with hematoma evacuation for large hemispheric hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013;115(3):317–22.

Ki HJ, Lee HJ, Lee HJ, et al. The risk factors for hydrocephalus and subdural hygroma after decompressive craniectomy in head injured patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(3):254–61.

Lee M-H, Yang J-T, Weng H-H, et al. Hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(5):555–9.

Fattahian R, Bagheri SR, Sadeghi M. Development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Med Arch.2018;72(3):214–9.

Wu YC, Liao HC, Lin JC, et al. Risk factors of postoperative hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages and intraventricular hemorrhage. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(41):e31086.

Wang QP, Ma JP, Zhou ZM, You C. Impact of operation details on hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2016;21(1):10–16.

Picard NA, Zanardi CA. Letter to the Editor Regarding “Are Hygromas and Hydrocephalus After Decompressive Craniectomy Caused by Impaired Brain Pulsatility, Cerebrospinal Fluid Hydrodynamics, and Glymphatic Drainage?” World Neurosurg. 2020;136:426.

Nasi D, Dobran M. Can early cranioplasty reduce the incidence of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy? A meta-analysis. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11:94.

Takeuchi S, Takasato Y, Masaoka H, et al. Hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for ischemic stroke. In: Katayama Y, ed. Brain Edema XV. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2013;118:289–92.

Tsianaka E, Fotakopoulos G, Siasios G, et al. Posttraumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy in 126 patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Surg A Cent EurNeurosurg. 2016;77(2):88–92.

Wang QP, Ma JP, Zhou ZM, et al. Hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for malignant hemispheric cerebral infarction. Int J Neurosci. 2016;126(3):252–8.

Beucler N, Dagain A. Historical vignette portraying the difference between the “sinking skin flap syndrome” and the “syndrome of the trephined” in decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg. 2022;162:11–4.

Wang QP, Ma JP, Zhou ZM, You C. Impact of operation details on hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2016;21(1):10–6.

Leach JL, Jones BV, Tomsick TA, Stewart CA, Balko MG. Normal appearance of arachnoid granulations on contrast-enhanced CT and MR of the brain: differentiation from dural sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(8):1523–32.

Borha A, Chagnot A, Goulay R, Emery E, Vivien D, Gaberel T. Cranioplasty reverses dysfunction of the solutes distribution in the brain parenchyma after decompressive craniectomy. Neurosurgery. 2020;0:1–6.

Rados M, Zivko M, Perisa A, Oreskovic D, Klarica M. No arachnoid granulations—no problems: number, size, and distribution of arachnoid granulations from birth to 80 years of age. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:698865.

Grossman CB, Potts DG. Arachnoid granulations: radiology and anatomy. Radiology. 1974;113(1):95–100.

Hladky SB, Barrand MA. Regulation of brain fluid volumes and pressures: basic principles, intracranial hypertension, ventriculomegaly and hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024;21:57.

Ki HJ, Lee HJ, Lee HJ, Yi JS, Yang JH, Lee IW. The risk factors for hydrocephalus and subdural hygroma after decompressive craniectomy in head injured patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(3):254–61.

Upton ML, Weller RO. The morphology of cerebrospinal fluid drainage pathways in human arachnoid granulations. J Neurosurg. 1985;63(6):867–75.

Waziri A, Fusco D, Mayer SA, McKhann GM II, Connolly ES Jr. Postoperative hydrocephalus in patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):489–94.