Development of Special Study Module for Medical Curriculum based on Adaptive Curriculum Concept

Main Article Content

Anupong Kantiwong
Ram Rungsin
Apipa Prachyapruit

Abstract

Introduction: The special study modules (SSM) of the Doctor of Medicine program is an educational program in the medical professional subject group aimed at developing learning skills based on medical students’ interest and competencies through a systematic adaptive learning framework. This research aims at studying the expectations towards educational management and developing of SSM in the medical degree program based on the adaptive curriculum concept.


Methods: This study utilized questionnaires to collect data on expectations of faculty members responsible for curriculum development and medical students regarding the SSM. The questionnaires were designed to focused on the priority order of modules within these two domains, the expectations for each module component and the adaptability method, with seven items per module. The data collected was then subjected to descriptive analysis, which aided in developing five SSM: Basic Medical Sciences (BMS), Clinical Medical Sciences (CMS), Community Medicine (CM), Specialty Clinical Practice (SCP), and Health Systems Science (HSS).


Results: Sixty-nine samples were collected from the total of 95 samples using simple random sampling technique, which is comprised of 38 sixth-year medical students (55.07%) and 31 faculty members (44.93%) from 19 medical faculties out of 22 institutions. The study revealed that faculty members and medical students gave the highest priority to the CMS module (Median = 5) across all institutions. Meanwhile, modules in BMC, CM, SCP, and HSS were rated highly important (Median = 4) across all regions, unlike from medical faculties in Bangkok, which rated all modules as the highest importance. In analyzing SSM components, it was found that the CMS module required the highest number of credits (at least 15 credits in years 4-6) compared to other modules: CM, SCP, HSS, and BMS, which should be allocated at least 14, 12, 12, and 10 credits, respectively. CM and HSS modules should be studied throughout the curriculum, unlike SCP, specific to clinical years, and BMS, confined to pre-clinical years. Most participants suggested these subjects integrate with the core curriculum (40.58% to 56.52%) and employ a mixed-learning approach. All modules should promote content-specific customization and provide module navigation for tailoring learning to the levels of learners under continuous guidance from an advising mentor.


Conclusion: Special study modules for specific subject areas that enhance students’ potential in accordance with their interests must organize subjects and module components specifically aiming to develop essential medical professional skills. Moreover, the SSMs should be adaptable to support medical students in selecting learning processes that match their interests and systematically correspond to their potentials.

Article Details

Section
นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ (Original Article)

References

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Quirk ME, Harden RM. Curriculum planning and development. In: Dent J, Harden R, Hunt D. London, UK: Elsevier. 2017 Apr 26:4-12.

Harden RM, Davis MH. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 5. The core curriculum with options or special study modules. Medical Teacher. 1995;17(2):125-48.

Moon J. The module and programme development handbook: A practical guide to linking levels, outcomes and assessment criteria. London : Routledge; 2003.

Prachyapruit A. Development of teacher preparation model to serve education 4.0. Rompruek Journal Krirk University. 2017;35(3):102-36.

Frank JR, Snell L, Englander R, Holmboe ES, Icbme Collaborators. Implementing competency-based medical education: Moving forward. Medical teacher. 2017;39(6):568-73.

Jason H, Westberg J. Preparing educators for adaptive education (AE) programs. Medical teacher. 2018;40(8):828-33.

Fontaine G, Cossette S, Maheu-Cadotte MA, Mailhot T, Deschênes MF, Mathieu-Dupuis G, Côté J, Gagnon MP, Dubé V. Efficacy of adaptive e-learning for health professionals and students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open. 2019;9(8):e025252.

Rahman SN, Alam NN, Alam T. Developing research knowledge through special study module: Notes from year 2 medical students [Online]. medRxiv. 2021: 6 p. [Cited 2024 Jun 20]. Available from : https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.12.21249687v1.full.pdf+html

Quirk M, Chumley H. The adaptive medical curriculum: a model for continuous improvement. Medical Teacher. 2018;40(8):786-90.

Gossell-Williams M, Paul T. Introducing medical students to pharmacovigilance through a Basic Research Skills Special Study Module. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2020;31(2):81-7.

Jacobson L, Grant A, Hood K, Lewis W, Robling M, Prout H, Cunningham AM. A literature and medicine special study module run by academics in general practice: two evaluations and the lessons learnt. Medical humanities. 2004;30(2):98-100.

Ghouse HP, Idris FI, Wint Z, Hasan T. A cross sectional survey of 3rd year undergraduate medical students’ perception of a ‘Community Oriented’multifaceted learning approach in the Special Studies Module SSM 3. The Asia Pacific Scholar. 2017;2(3):8.

Jha V, Duffy S, Murdoch-Eaton D. Development of transferable skills during short special study modules: students' self-appraisal. Med Teach. 2002;24(2):202-4.

Howlin C, Lynch D. A framework for the delivery of personalized adaptive content. In : 2014 International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL) 2014 Nov 25 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

Coiffier B, Shen PC, Lee EY, Kwong TS, Lai AY, Wong EM, Chiu KW, Vardhanabhuti V, Khong PL. Introducing point-of-care ultrasound through structured multifaceted ultrasound module in the undergraduate medical curriculum at the University of Hong Kong. Ultrasound. 2020 ;28(1):38-46.

Kiessling C, Müller T, Becker-Witt C, Begenau J, Prinz V, Schleiermacher S. A medical humanities special study module on principles of medical theory and practice at the Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. Acad Med. 2003;78(10):1031-5.

Maxwell RS, Pounder DJ. The medicine and human rights special study module: a physicians for human rights (UK) initiative. Medical Teacher. 2009;21(3):294-8.

IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.;2021.

Kaewyod T, Kanchanatawan B. Interests in medical specialties, personalities and correlated factors in choosing future training of sixth year medical students, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Chulalongkorn Medical Journal. 2011;55(4):381-97.

Pitanupong J, Wongsuwan K. Factors for Choosing Residency Training Programs of Medical Students. Songklanagarind Medical Journal. 2017;35(3):263-72.

Rabintossaporn P, Ngamjariyawat A, Thuppia A, Sukprasert N, Saenthaweesuk S, Somparn N. Factors affecting the enrollment of elective prescribed course of third-and fifth-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University. Thammasat Medical Journal. 2019;19:S148-54.

Supawattanabodee B, Kluiprasert N. Need and reason of 6th Year Medical Students’ Selection of Residency Program. Vajira Medical Journal: Journal of Urban Medicine. 2019 31;63(5):349-56.

Chantharakhit C, Sujaritvanichpong N. Evaluation Factors may Affect The Goals of a doctor’s Life of Medical Students in Medical Education Center Buddhasothorn Hospital. The Journal of Prapokklao Hospital Clinical Medical Education Center. 2020;37(1):26-34.

Sripa P. Direction of Family Physicians towards Thai Health Care System. Journal of Health Science of Thailand. 2019;28(1):176-84.

Suvarnabhumi K, Wanichanon W, Pinsuwan T. Comparative Study on Satisfaction and Experiences of Medical Students Toward Family Medicine Outpatient Care at Clinics in Community and University Hospital. Songklanagarind Medical Journal. 2011;29(4):175-81.

Pokpermdee P. National Strategic Plan for Excellent Centers of Medical Service and Academic and Research in Thailand (5-10 years). Journal of Health Science of Thailand. 2020 ;29(6):1133-46.