The Diagnostic Accuracy of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) Ultrasound Classification for Diagnosing Thyroid Carcinoma in Thai Population

Authors

  • Pichayapa Tribumrungsuk Department of Surgery, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
  • Pitsiree Bunnag Department of Radiology, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
  • Chuenrutai Yeekian Department of Research and Academic Services, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital
  • Kanokporn Sarsitthithum Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital

Keywords:

ACR TI-RADS, Thyroid carcinoma, Thyroid nodule, Malignancy risk

Abstract

Background: Thyroid carcinoma is the most common endocrine tumor. Both ultrasonography and Fine needle aspiration should be performed for accurate diagnosis and evaluation. The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) is a risk stratification system for thyroid lesions, based on sonographic characteristics. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of ACR TI-RADS in prognostication of malignancy across the Thai population. Method: We conducted a retrospective, study in Queen Savang Vadhana Red Cross Memorial Hospital, Thailand between January 2020 and September 2021. Data from 125 patients with 201 thyroid nodules who underwent ultrasonography using TIRADS classification, FNA biopsy and histopathology report were collected. The sonographic features were described according to ACR TI-RADS. These results were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using SPSS. Results: ACR TI-RADS had specificity of 73.6% and sensitivity of 70.5%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 58.2% and 82.7%, respectively. The accuracy of the ACR TI-RADS in our study was 71.6%. The prevalence of malignancy in TR1, TR2, TR3, TR4, and TR5 was 0%, 0%, 22%, 42%, and 92%, respectively. The echogenic foci has the highest area under the curve for detecting thyroid malignancy. Bethesda score 3 delivered as the cutoff for identifying malignant nodules in the TR4 and TR5 groups with sensitivity 86.7, and specificity 85.7. Conclusion: The ACR TI-RADS provides effective malignancy risk stratification for thyroid nodules. Thyroid nodules classified as TR4 or TR5 in our study are highly suspicious for malignancy and should be considered as indication for FNA.

References

Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Kunreuther E, Contreras M, Cibas ES, et al. Prevalence and distribution of carcinoma in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules on sonography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91(9):3411-7.

Thyroid Cancer Fact Sheet [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/ cancers/32-Thyroid-fact-sheet.pdf

The Surveillance E and ER (SEER) P. Thyroid Cancer — Cancer Stat Facts [Internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Apr 28]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/thyro.html

Chen AY, Jemal A, Ward EM. Increasing incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer in the United States, 1988-2005. Cancer 2009; 115(16):3801-7.

Radecki PD, Arger PH, Arenson RL, Jennings AS, Coleman BG, Mintz MC, et al. Thyroid imaging: comparison of high-resolution real-time ultrasound and computed tomography. Radiology 1984;153(1):145-7.

Songsaeng D, Soodchuen S, Korpraphong P, Suwanbundit A. Siriraj thyroid imaging reporting and data system and its efficacy. Siriraj Med J 2017;69(5):262-7.

Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Comparison of performance characteristics of American college of radiology TI-RADS, Korean society of thyroid radiology TIRADS, and American thyroid association guidelines. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210(5):1148-54.

Yang R, Zou X, Zeng H, Zhao Y, Ma X. Comparison of diagnostic performance of five different ultrasound TI-RADS classification guidelines for thyroid nodules. Front Oncol 2020;10:598225.

Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, Hoang JK, Berland LL, Teefey SA, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14(5):587-95.

Grant EG, Tessler FN, Hoang JK, Langer JE, Beland MD, Berland LL, et al. Thyroid ultrasound reporting lexicon: white paper of the ACR thyroid imaging, reporting and data system (TIRADS) committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(12 Pt A):1272-9.

Grani G, Lamartina L, Ascoli V, Bosco D, Biffoni M, Giacomelli L, et al. Reducing the number of unnecessary thyroid biopsies while improving diagnostic accuracy: toward the “Right” TIRADS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104(1):95-102.

Suttawas A. ACR TI-RADS Classification in predicting thyroid malignancy at prachuapkhirikhan hospital. Reg 4-5 Med J 2019; 38(2):84–92.

Harmontree S. Accuracy of ACR-TIRADS in assessment and diagnosis of thyroid nodule in Sena Hospital, Ayutthaya province. J Med & Public Health, UBU. 2021;4(1):28-39.

Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The 2017 Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid 2017;27(11):1341-6.

Hoang JK, Middleton WD, Tessler FN. Update on ACR TI-RADS: successes, challenges, and future directions, from the AJR special series on radiology reporting and data systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;216(3):570-8.

Li W, Wang Y, Wen J, Zhang L, Sun Y. Diagnostic performance of American college of radiology TI-RADS: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021;216(1):38-47.

Zheng Y, Xu S, Kang H, Zhan W. A Single-center retrospective validation study of the American college of radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system. Ultrasound Q 2018;34(2): 77-83.

Middleton WD, Teefey SA, Reading CC, Langer JE, Beland MD, Szabunio MM, et al. Multiinstitutional analysis of thyroid nodule risk stratification using the American college of radiology thyroid imaging reporting and data system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;208(6):1331-41.

Ahmadi S, Oyekunle T, Jiang X’, Scheri R, Perkins J, Stang M, et al. A Direct comparison of the ATA and TI-RADS Ultrasound scoring systems. Endocr Pract 2019;25(5):413-22.

Shayganfar A, Hashemi P, Esfahani MM, Ghanei AM, Moghadam NA, Ebrahimian S. Prediction of thyroid nodule malignancy using thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) and nodule size. Clin Imaging 2020;60(2):222-7.

Al Dawish M, Alwin Robert A, Al Shehri K, Hawsawi S, Mujammami M, Al Basha IA, et al. Risk stratification of thyroid nodules with Bethesda III category: The experience of a territorial healthcare hospital. Cureus 2020;12(5):e8202.

Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol 2012;56(4):333-9.

Al Dawish M, Alwin Robert A, Al Shehri K, Hawsawi S, Mujammami M, Al Basha IA, et al. Risk stratification of thyroid nodules with Bethesda III category: The experience of a territorial healthcare hospital. Cureus 2020;12(5):e8202.

Tan H, Li Z, Li N, Qian J, Fan F, Zhong H, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system combined with Bethesda classification in qualitative thyroid nodule diagnosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98(50):e18320.

Downloads

Published

15-09-2023

How to Cite

1.
Tribumrungsuk P, Bunnag P, Yeekian C, Sarsitthithum K. The Diagnostic Accuracy of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) Ultrasound Classification for Diagnosing Thyroid Carcinoma in Thai Population. J DMS [Internet]. 2023 Sep. 15 [cited 2024 May 16];48(3):30-7. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/259040

Issue

Section

Original Article