Effectiveness of Utilizing Social Networks in Follow-Up for Lost to Follow-up Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health
Keywords:
Medical social work, Cleft lip and cleft palate, Social network, Patient follow-upAbstract
Background: Cleft lip and cleft palate are abnormalities or deformities of the face, lips, base of the nose and palate, affecting children physically, mentally, and socially. These conditions also place a significant burden on caregivers and families, as parents often need to take time off work and bear travel expenses to facilitate treatment. Due to the long treatment and healing period, patients are at high risk of being lost to follow-up during the treatment process. Social workers have played a crucial role in following up with patients who missed appointments. However, out of 310 patients, only 55 could be contacted, while the remaining 255 were unreachable. Therefore, social networks were utilized to assist with the follow-up of patients who had missed appointments for more than one year. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of social networks in following up pediatric patients with cleft lip and cleft palate who had lost contact or missed appointments for over one year at the Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted using record forms to investigate social network utilization for appointment follow-up among 255 pediatric patients with cleft lip and cleft palate who have missed appointments for over a year. The study was conducted by the Medical Social Work Department at the Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health. Result: It was found that the primary government healthcare networks achieved the highest success rate in patient follow-up, at 95.7%. Meanwhile, the community healthcare networks achieved the highest success rate in patient follow-up, at 65.7%. Conclusion: The effectiveness of social networks in both government healthcare networks and community healthcare and administrative networks can reintegrate the patients into the treatment system by at least 80 percent.
References
Mink van der Molen AB, van Breugel JMM, Janssen NG, Admiraal RJC, van Adrichem LNA, Bierenbroodspot F, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the treatment of patients with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate: an executive summary. J Clin Med 2021;10(21):4813.
Chowchuen B, Phrathani B, Rattanayatikul J. Interdisciplinary care of cleft lip, cleft palate and congenital facial and craniofacial anomalies. Khon Kaen: Siriphand Printing offset; 2004. p.25-45.
Ascha M, McDaniel J, Link I, Rowe D, Soltanian H, Sattar A, et al. Social and Support Services Offered by Cleft and Craniofacial Teams: A National Survey and Institutional Experience. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(2):356-60.
Pongsaengpan P, Pinkaew A. Social support and networks for the elderly in community. PHJBUU 2015;10(2):109-16.
Pakkasang Y, Sroyhin W, Numjaitaharn S, Rod-ong D, Chonprai C, Samretdee H, et al. Improvement quality of life in patients with cleft lip and palate by home visit program. SRIMEDJ 2021;36(2):166-70.
Heaney CA, Isael BA. Social network and social support. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p.189-210.
Kaye A, Lybrand S. The cleft team social worker. Social Work Health Care 2016;55(4):280-95.
Turkat D. Social networks: Theory and practice. J Community Psychol 1980;8(2):99-109.
Kadushin C. Understanding social networks: Theories, concepts and findings. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p.3-252.
Kaewnopparat S. The effect of social support from social network on the stress of the autism parints at Child Mental Health Center [Dissertation]. Bangkok: Thammasat University; 2541. p.7-77
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Department of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของกรมการแพทย์ กระทรวงสาธารณสุข
ข้อความและข้อคิดเห็นต่างๆ เป็นของผู้เขียนบทความ ไม่ใช่ความเห็นของกองบรรณาธิการหรือของวารสารกรมการแพทย์