Effectiveness of Disabled Patient Semi-sit to Stand Electric Transfer Lift “Easy Safety Transfer Model 3” to Caregiver’s Ergonomic (Phase 2)

Authors

  • Punyapha Surasitsin Assistive Technology Unit, Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute
  • Nahunnop Bunname Assistive Technology Unit, Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute
  • Salin Ruangsri Assistive Technology Unit, Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute
  • Suchai Pongpakpian Assistive Technology Unit, Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute

Keywords:

Semi-sit-to-stand transfer lift, Patient sit-to-stand lift, Patient transfer device

Abstract

Background: This innovation was reviewed for risk incidence in 2018 according to the 2P Safety principles that occurred at the Sirindhorn National Medical Rehabilitation Institute and then introduced into the design thinking process, which focuses on human user-centered. Objective: To study the effectiveness of a disabled patient's semi-sit-to-stand electric transfer lift on the ergonomics of caregivers and further develop a prototype device that is easy to use and safe. Method: This was an experimental study using a disabled patient's semi-sit-to-stand electric transfer lift. Tested in a group of 30 pairs of disabled patients and caregivers (n = 30). Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test, setting the statistical significance level at < .05. Results: When comparing the ergonomic risks of the two methods, it was found that the risk score in the disabled patient transfer step using a transfer device was different from transferring disabled patients using a caregiver (p-value < .001), significance level α = 0.05 and most of the disabled patient group felt comfortable to very comfortable (86.67%) and felt safe to very safe (93.33%). The group of caregivers were very satisfied with the use of the equipment in terms of the dimensions of the equipment, the ease of adjusting the parts of the equipment, the safety and security of the equipment, the durability, and the effectiveness of the equipment in meeting needs for a total of 5 items. Conclusion: The prototype innovation can greatly reduce the ergonomic risks of caregivers and meet the needs of users. This research does not yet have enough evidence to conclude that it can be commercially produced.

References

Suksawang S. Design Thinking, a tool for developing innovation in organizations: HCD Innovation. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Mar 1] Available from: https://www.sasimasuk.com/16810879/design-thinking-เครื่องมือพัฒนานวัตกรรมในองค์กร

Ergonomics jobs in Thailand. Ergonomics assessment. [Internet]. 2014, [cited 2021 Jun 22]. Available from: http://thai-ergonomicassessment.blogspot.com/search/label/REBA

Hignett S, McAtamney L. Rapid entire body assessment (REBA). Appl Ergon 2000;31(2):201-5.

Niyom A. Ergonomics risk assessment of Teak Harvesters by REBA and ai techniques in Thongphapoom and Saiyok1 Plantations, Kanchanaburi Province. [dissertation MScFE. Major Field: Forest Engineering] Bangkok: Kasetsart University; 2017.

Zhuang Z, Stobbe TJ, Collins JW, Hsiao H, Hobbs GR. Psychophysical assessment of assistive devices for transferring patients/residents. Appl Ergon 2000;31(1):35-44.

Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST version 2.0): an outcome measure for assistive technology devices. New York: Institute for Matching Person and Technology; 2000.

Panyawong W, Saksiri B, Somboon P. Assistive Technologies: The Level of Satisfaction and Psychosocial Impacts of the Persons with Mobility Impairments in Samut Sakhorn Province. 9th National Academic

Seminar on Persons with Disabilities; 2017 Jul 26-27 [internet]. Nakhonprathom: Mahidol University; 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 22]: p. 343-356. Available from: http://www.rs.mahidol.ac.th/ncpd-2017/2017/Full-Paper/026.pdf.

Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30(7):551-8.

Kongkamol C. Ergonomic transfer techniques for dependent patients with medical equipments. [Doctor of Philosophy]. Pathum Thani: Thammasat University; 2019

Pompeii LA, Lipscomb HJ, Schoenfisch AL, Dement JM. Musculoskeletal injuries resulting from patient handling tasks among hospital workers. Am J Ind Med 2009;52(7):571-8.

Pellino TA, Owen B, Knapp L, Noack J. The evaluation of mechanical devices for lateral transfers on perceived exertion and patient comfort. Orthop Nurs 2006;25(1):4-10; quiz 1-2.

Downloads

Published

16-12-2024

How to Cite

1.
Surasitsin P, Bunname N, Ruangsri S, Pongpakpian S. Effectiveness of Disabled Patient Semi-sit to Stand Electric Transfer Lift “Easy Safety Transfer Model 3” to Caregiver’s Ergonomic (Phase 2). J DMS [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 16 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];49(4):41-50. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/266025

Issue

Section

Original Article