Women Behind Bars: A Qualitative Study of Gender-Sensitive Health Care Experiences in a Model Prison in Northeastern Thailand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60099/prijnr.2026.276773Keywords:
Gender-sensitive, Health services, Northeast Thailand, Nursing, Qualitative Descriptive Study, Women prisonersAbstract
This study addresses the growing concern that women prisoners face unique health needs in correctional settings originally designed for men, where gender-sensitive health care remains limited despite international standards such as the Bangkok Rules. This qualitative descriptive study is a part of the larger project entitled “Health Services for Women in Prison.” It aimed to explore the perspectives of women prisoners on prison health services, with a particular emphasis on gender-sensitive care in line with the Bangkok Rules and the principle of “Prison Health is Public Health.” The study, conducted between December 2022 and June 2024, explored the perspectives of 39 women prisoners and prison public health volunteers in a model prison in northeastern Thailand. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document reviews and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two major themes emerged. First, participants perceived prison health services as adequate and responsive, highlighting accessibility, timeliness, and comprehensive coverage. Second, several gender-sensitive needs remained unmet, including the demand for pelvic examinations by female doctors, earlier cervical cancer screening, mental health promotion, and peer support networks. Despite the positive perception of prison health services, these gaps underscore the continuous challenges in providing gender-specific care.
The findings highlight the need for policy measures to strengthen reproductive health guidelines, systematically allocate resources, and institutionalize peer support within prison health systems. Nurses play a crucial role in ensuring privacy, trust, and trauma-informed care while coordinating with multidisciplinary teams to implement the Bangkok Rules and uphold the principle of “Prison Health is Public Health.”
References
Walmsley R. World female imprisonment list. 4th ed. [Internet]. London: Institute for Crime & Justice Policy Research; 2017 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.prisonstudies.org/news/world-female-imprisonment-list-fourth-edition
Penal Reform International. Global prison trends 2022 [Internet]. London: Penal Reform International; 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.penalreform.org/resource/global-prison-trends-2022/
Wajanapa K. Sick in prison [Internet]. Bangkok: Thai Health Promotion Foundation (THPF); 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://section09.thaihealth.or.th/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2022/10/Book-ป่วยไข้ในเรือนจำ.pdf [in Thai]
United Nations General Assembly. United Nations rules for the treatment of women prisoners and non-custodial measures for women offenders (the Bangkok Rules) [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2010 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Bangkok_Rules_ENG_22032015.pdf
Sawasdipanich N, Puektes S, Wannasuntad S, Sriyaporn A, Chawmathagit C, Sintunava J, et al. Development of healthcare facility standards for Thai female inmates. Int J Prison Health. 2018;14(3):163–74. doi:10.1108/IJPH-07-2017-0032
Sunpuwan M, Thaweesit S, Tangchonlatip K. Perceived anxiety and depression and associated factors among women inmates with a long-term sentence in Thailand. PLoS One. 2024;19(3):e0299318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0299318
International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC). Punitive drug laws: 10 years undermining the Bangkok Rules [Internet]. London: IDPC; 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://cdn.penalreform.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Punitive-Drug-Laws-10-years-undermining-the-Bangkok-Rules.pdf
Rungreangkulkij S, Silarat M, Kotnara I. Prisoners' perceptions of the healthcare service: A qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2021;23(1):120–7. doi:10.1111/nhs.12813
Sufrin C, Beal L, Clarke J, Jones R, Mosher WD. Pregnancy outcomes in US prisons, 2016–2017. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(5):799–805. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2019.305006
Sufrin C, Jones RK, Mosher WD, Beal L, Bell S. Abortion access for incarcerated people: Incidence of abortion and policies at US prisons and jails. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;138(3):330–7. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004497
Rajagopal K, Landis-Lewis D, Haven K, Sufrin C. Reproductive health care for incarcerated people: Advancing health equity in inequitable settings. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2023;66(1):73–85. doi:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000746
Roth R, Ainsworth S. If they hand you a paper, you sign it: A call to end the sterilization of women in prison. Hastings Women's Law J [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 10];31(1):1–25. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/haswo31&div=8&id=&page=
Mazher S, Arai T. Behind bars: A trauma-informed examination of mental health through importation and deprivation models in prisons. Eur J Trauma Dissociation. 2025;9(1):100516. doi:10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100516
Jewkes Y, Jordan M, Wright S, Bendelow G. Designing healthy prisons for women: Incorporating trauma-informed care and practice into prison planning and design. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(20):3818. doi:10.3390/ijerph16203818
Public Health England. Gender-specific standards to improve health and well-being for women in prison in England [Internet]. London: PHE; 2018 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/687146/Gender_specific_standards_for_women_in_prison_to_improve_health_and_wellbeing.pdf
Kramer C, Thomas K, Patil A, Dada S, West M. Shackling and pregnancy care policies in US prisons and jails. Matern Child Health J. 2023;27(1):186–96. doi:10.1007/s10995-022-03526-y
Ferszt GG, Palmer M, McGrane C. Where does your state stand on shackling of pregnant incarcerated women? Nurs Womens Health. 2018;22(1):17–23. doi:10.1016/j.nwh.2017.12.005
Payaboon P, Sawasdipanich N, Rojanapithayakorn P, Wannasuntad S. Health services for postpartum female prisoners in Thailand. J Nurs Educ Pract [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2025 Jul 10];21(1):5–17. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Jolbcnm/article/view/39757
Paynter MJ, Dreifuss HM, Emerson AM. Access to abortion and contraceptive services in carceral settings: A scoping review. BMC Womens Health. 2025;25(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12905-024-03523-z
Chirawatkul S. Gender sensitiveness in nursing practice. J Thailand Nurs Midwifery Counc [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 10];35(3):5–16. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJONC/article/view/239875 [in Thai]
Thitiyanviroj B, Bloom T, Thaewpia S, Intaraphet S, Butudom A, Intharueng U, et al. Perceptions of screening women for intimate partner violence among health care providers in Thailand. Nurs Womens Health. 2024;28(6):438–45. doi:10.1016/j.nwh.2024.10.002
Boonyapisomparn N, Manojai N, Srikummoon P, Bunyatisai W, Traisathit P, et al. Healthcare discrimination and factors associated with gender-affirming healthcare avoidance by transgender women and transgender men in Thailand: Findings from a cross-sectional online survey study. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22:31. doi:10.1186/s12939-023-01843-4
Turale S. A brief introduction to qualitative description: A research design worth using. Belitung Nurs J. 2020;6(3):93–7. doi:10.33546/bnj.1204
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–51. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation [Internet]. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1989 [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/isbn_0803932359
Department of Corrections Thailand. Bangkok Rules pilot prisons report 2023 [Internet]. Bangkok: Department of Corrections; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/thailandprison804a.pdf [in Thai]
World Health Organization. Health in prisons: A WHO guide to the essentials in prison health [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2022 [cited 2025 Jun 30]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-determinants/prisons-and-health
Ahmed R, Angel C, Martel R, Pyne D, Keenan L. Access to healthcare services during incarceration among female inmates. Int J Prison Health. 2016;12(4):204–15. doi:10.1108/IJPH-04-2016-0009
Kirubarajan A, Tsang J, Dong S, Hui J, Sreeram P, Mohmand Z, et al. Pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration: A qualitative systematic review of lived experiences. BJOG. 2022;129(9):1460–72. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.17137
Buston K, Wright S, Brady G. Women in prison: The role of peer support in enhancing well-being. Int J Prison Health. 2021;17(2):156–71. doi:10.1108/IJPH-02-2020-0007
Cavanagh A, Shamsheri T, Shen K, Gaber J, Liauw J, Vanstone M, et al. Lived experiences of pregnancy and prison through a reproductive justice lens: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Soc Sci Med. 2022;307:115179. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115179
Nguyen T, Li J, Gray R, O'Brien AP. Health peer-led interventions for women in prison: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2021;30(19–20):2998–3011. doi:10.1111/jocn.15741
Nowotny KM, Masters RK, Boardman JD. The relationship between incarceration and health among US adults: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Soc Sci Med. 2020;258:113095. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113095
Naylor B, Baldry E. The role of gender in programs for women in prison. Women Crim Justice. 2015;25(5):337–52. doi:10.1080/08974454.2015.1076402
Maslow AH. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50(4):370–96. doi:10.1037/h0054346
Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19(2):127–40. doi:10.1097/00005650-198102000-00001
Caulfield LS. Counterintuitive findings from a qualitative study of mental health in English women's prisons. Int J Prison Health. 2016;12(4):216–29. doi:10.1108/IJPH-05-2016-0013
Kennedy SC, Mennicke AM. Behind every woman in prison is a man: Incarcerated women’s perceptions of how we can better help them in the context of interpersonal victimization. J Prog Hum Serv. 2017;29(3):206–29. doi:10.1080/10428232.2017.1399034
Bartlett A, Hollins S. Challenges and mental health needs of women in prison. Br J Psychiatry. 2018;212(3):134–6. doi:10.1192/bjp.2017.42
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: The Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, Thailand Nursing & Midwifery Council has exclusive rights to publish, reproduce and distribute the manuscript and all contents therein.





.png)

