Marginal bone loss adjacent to Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures
Keywords:
Level of marginal bone, Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures, Marginal bone loss around the implantAbstract
This descriptive study aimed to evaluate the marginal bone loss of the implant-retained mandibular overdentures. 51 patients were treated at the dental department of Ranong hospital, Ranong province between October 2010 to September 2017.Almost 51 cases were chosen to be the samples of this study as the result of completeness of radiography periodically.The mean age of sample was 65.3 years,64.7 percents was female and 35.3 percents was male.Eighteen months after implantation,61.5 and 62.8 percents of implant in 33-34 area and 43-44 area respectively had the bone level at polishing surface of implants.The marginal bone loss of implants was not exceed one-third of the length of implant.All of implants showed no peri-implant radiolucent.
References
Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health. The 6th national oral health survey in Thailand 2006-2007. Nonthaburi:Dental Health Division,Ministry of Public Health;
2008
Zitzmann NU, Sendi P, Marinello CP. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results.Int J Prosthodont; 2005;18:20-7.
Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, FeineJS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.Int J
Prosthodont; 2003;16:467-73.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’t Hof MA. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective
study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants; 2003;18:879-85.
Smith DE, ZarbGA. Criteria for success of osseointegratedendosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent; 1989;62:567-72.
De Smet E, Duyck J, vanderSloten J, Jacobs R, Naert I. Timing of loading- immediate,early or delayed-in the outcome of implants in the edentulous mandible:
aprospective clinical trial. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants; 2007;22:580-94.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M.A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibularoverdentures: peri-implant outcome.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004;19:695-702.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The Iong-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J
Oral and Maxillofac Implants; 1986;1:11-25.
Karoussis IK, Muller S, Salvi GE, Heitz Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Lang NP. Association between periodontal and periimplant conditions: a 10-year prospective study.Clin
Oral Implants Res; 2004;15:1-7.
Elsyad MA, AI-Mahdy YF, Fouad MM. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immedi-ate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular
overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res; 2012;23:496-503.
Wismeyer D, van Waas MA, Veemeeren JI. Overdentures supported by ITI implants: a 6.5-year evaluation of patient satisfaction and prosthetic aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995;10:744-9.
Buser D, Mericke-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis
of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997;8:161-72.
MegrathC.,ZhangW;Lo EC.A review of the effectiveness of oral health promoting activating among elderly people. Gerodontology; 2009; 26(2):85-86
Walls AW, Steele SG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, Moynihan PJ. Oral health and nutrition in older people.J Public Health Dent; 2000;60(4) 304-7
Anastassiadou V, Robin Health M.The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties. Gerodontology; 2006: 23(1) :23-32
Mombeli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontology 2000; 1994;4:81-6
Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, etal. Experience with ITI osteointegrated implants at five centres in
the UK. BR J oral maxillofacsurg ;1992:30;377-81
Att AW, Stappert C. Implant therapy to improve quality of life.Quuintessence Int; 2003;34:573-81
2008
Zitzmann NU, Sendi P, Marinello CP. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results.Int J Prosthodont; 2005;18:20-7.
Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, FeineJS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.Int J
Prosthodont; 2003;16:467-73.
Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Van’t Hof MA. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective
study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction. Int J Oral maxillofac Implants; 2003;18:879-85.
Smith DE, ZarbGA. Criteria for success of osseointegratedendosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent; 1989;62:567-72.
De Smet E, Duyck J, vanderSloten J, Jacobs R, Naert I. Timing of loading- immediate,early or delayed-in the outcome of implants in the edentulous mandible:
aprospective clinical trial. Int J Oral and Maxillofac Implants; 2007;22:580-94.
Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M.A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibularoverdentures: peri-implant outcome.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004;19:695-702.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The Iong-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J
Oral and Maxillofac Implants; 1986;1:11-25.
Karoussis IK, Muller S, Salvi GE, Heitz Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Lang NP. Association between periodontal and periimplant conditions: a 10-year prospective study.Clin
Oral Implants Res; 2004;15:1-7.
Elsyad MA, AI-Mahdy YF, Fouad MM. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immedi-ate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular
overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implant Res; 2012;23:496-503.
Wismeyer D, van Waas MA, Veemeeren JI. Overdentures supported by ITI implants: a 6.5-year evaluation of patient satisfaction and prosthetic aftercare. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995;10:744-9.
Buser D, Mericke-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis
of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res; 1997;8:161-72.
MegrathC.,ZhangW;Lo EC.A review of the effectiveness of oral health promoting activating among elderly people. Gerodontology; 2009; 26(2):85-86
Walls AW, Steele SG, Sheiham A, Marcenes W, Moynihan PJ. Oral health and nutrition in older people.J Public Health Dent; 2000;60(4) 304-7
Anastassiadou V, Robin Health M.The effect of denture quality attributes on satisfaction and eating difficulties. Gerodontology; 2006: 23(1) :23-32
Mombeli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontology 2000; 1994;4:81-6
Wedgwood D, Jennings KJ, Critchlow HA, Watkinson AC, Shepherd JP, Frame JW, etal. Experience with ITI osteointegrated implants at five centres in
the UK. BR J oral maxillofacsurg ;1992:30;377-81
Att AW, Stappert C. Implant therapy to improve quality of life.Quuintessence Int; 2003;34:573-81
Downloads
Published
2018-12-03
How to Cite
อินทสะโร ภ. (2018). Marginal bone loss adjacent to Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures. Region 11 Medical Journal, 32(4), 1397–1406. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/176523
Issue
Section
Original articles
