A Comparative Study between Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release with 18-gauge hypodermic needle Technique and Open Technique.

Authors

  • เกื้อกูล พิทักษ์ราษฎร์ Suratthani Hospital

Keywords:

Trigger finger, percutaneous trigger finger surgery, open trigger finger surgery

Abstract

              Objective : To compare the results of open surgery with those of percutaneous surgery using 18-gauge needle in patients with trigger
fingers.
              Materials and Methods : one hundred and four patients with 110 trigger fingers were prospectively randomized to either open (51 patients,55 fingers) or percutaneous(53 patients,55 fingers) surgeries at Yasothon Hospital. The operation was performed by one surgeon between September 1, 2011 and December30, 2013. Operative time, patient pain score(VAS), the returning time to daily activities and surgical complications were assessed at weeks 1,3 and 6.
              Results : There were not statistical difference in demographic data.Trigger fingers were successfully treated in 55 fingers(100%) of the patients who underwent open surgery and in 54fingers(98.1%) of the patients who underwent percutaneous surgery. Mean postoperative time and mean returning time to daily activity were significant shorter in percutaneous surgery group. The percutaneous surgery group had lower pain score at 1 week follow-up than those in control group. No serious complications were observed in either group. The result found that one patient in the percutaneous’ surgery group
underwent open surgery 2 weeks after surgery due to residual triggering.
              Conclusion : Percutaneous surgical technique in the treatment of trigger finger is a safe,cheap and effective method with a low rate of complications. It , is less painful and allows the patient to return to daily activities in a shorter time and is therefore a preferable alternative to open surgery.

References

1. Wolfe SW. Tenosynovitis. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Wolfe SW, editors. Green’s operative hand surgery.5th ed. Vol. 2. Philadelphia:
Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2137–58.

2. Quinnell RC. Conservative management of trigger finger.Practitioner 1980 224:187-90.

3. Newport ML, Lane LB, Stuchin SA.Treatment of trigger finger by steroid injection. J Hand Surg [Am]1990. 15:748-50.

4. Benson LS, Ptaszek AJ.Injection versus surgery in the treatment of trigger finger. J Hand Surg [Am]1997. 22-A:138-44.

5. Lee WT, Chong AK.Outcome study of open trigger digit release. J Hand SurgEur Vol. 2011;36:339

6. Thorpe AP. Results of surgery for trigger finger. J Hand Surg 1988.13B:199-201.

7. Lorthioir J Jr. Surgical treatment of trigger-finger by a subcutaneous method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958 40-A: 793-5.

8. Tanaka J, Muraji M, Negoro H, et al. Subcutaneous release of trigger thumb and fingers in 210 fingers. J Hand Surg [Br] 1990;15:463-5.

9. Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP.Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992. 17:114-7.

10. Lyu S-R.Closed division of the flexor tendon sheath for trigger finger. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992. 74-B:418-20.

11. Patel MR, Moradia VJ.Percutaneous release of trigger digit with and without cortisone injection. J Hand Surg [Am] 1997. 22:150-5.

12. Stothard J, Kumar A. A safe percutaneous procedure for trigger finger release. J R CollSurgEdinb 39:116-117, 1994

13. Gilberts E, Beekman W, Stevens H, WereldsmaetJ. Prospective randomized trial of open versus percutaneous surgery for trigger digits. J Hand Surg [Am] 2001; 26:497-500

14. Bain GI, Turnbull J, Charles MN, Roth JH, Richards RS. Percutaneous A1 pulley release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 1995. 20: 781-4.

15. Pope DF, Wolfe SW. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Am 1995. 20: 280-3.

16. Thoedprison S, Piyapromdee U. Comparative Study between Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release with Feel and Pull Technique and Open
Technique: Preliminary Report. MaharatNakhon Ratchasima Hospital Medical Bulletin2009.3: 168-174

17. Cakmak F, Wolf MB, Bruckner T, Hahn P, Unglaub F. Follow-up investigation of open trigger digit release. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012. 132:685–91.

18. Will R, Lubahn J. Complications of open trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Am. 2010.35:594–6.

19. Ha KI, Park MJ, Ha CW. Percutaneous release of trigger digits. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 83: 75-7.

20. Park MJ, Oh I, Ha KI. A1 pulley release of locked trigger digit by percutaneous technique. J Hand Surg Br 2004. 29: 502-5

21. Pavlicny R. Percutaneous release in the treatment of trigger digits. ActaChirOrthopTraumatol Cech. 2010 Feb 77(1):46-51

22. Dahabra IA, Sawaqed IS. Percutaneous trigger finger release with 18-gauge needle.Saudi Med J.2007 Jul;28(7):1065-7.

23. Slesarenko YA, Mallo G, Hurst LC, Sampson SP, Serra-Hsu F. Percutaneous release of A 1 pulley. Tech Hand UpExtremSurg 2006 10: 54-6.

24. Cebesoy O, Karakurum G, Kose KC, Baltaci ET, Isik M. Percutaneous release of trigger thumb: Is it safe, cheap and effective? International orthopaedics(SICOT)2007 31:345-249.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-02

How to Cite

พิทักษ์ราษฎร์ เ. (2015). A Comparative Study between Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release with 18-gauge hypodermic needle Technique and Open Technique. Region 11 Medical Journal, 29(1), 85–94. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/180327

Issue

Section

Original articles