The prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate metformin prescription in type 2 DM patients with contraindications: a case study in Thailand

Authors

  • ปรารถนา ปันทะ Suratthani Hospital
  • วิน เตชะเคหะกิจ Suratthani Hospital

Keywords:

Metformin, Inappropriate prescription, Diabetes

Abstract

              Objectives: To explore the prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate metformin prescription in type 2 DM patients with contraindications.
              Design, setting, participants: A cross-sectional study including type 2 DM patients aged ≥30 who visited the outpatient department at Lampang Hospital in 2017 and were prescribed metformin at least once. Data from electronic medical records (EMR) were used to identify diabetic patients using ICD10 codes, together with other covariates. Inappropriate prescription was defined as patients receiving metformin over the maximum daily doses indicated for each of the risks. The risks were categorized into the following 3 groups: 1) Metformin prescription not recommended in patients with CKD stage 4 or above, chronic liver disease, or heart failure; 2) A maximum daily dose of 1,000 mg in patients with CKD stage 3b; and 3) A maximum daily dose of 2,550 mg in patients without the abovementioned conditions.
              Outcomes measured: Primary outcome: prevalence of inappropriate metformin prescription in type 2 DM patients with contraindications.
              Results: Among 5,812 DM patients, the prevalence of inappropriate metformin prescriptions was 15%. Of these, 8.6% were prescribed metformin over the maximum dose of 2,550 mg per day. In CKD stage 3b group, 46% received inappropriate prescriptions. The specialty of physician and the length of work experience were found to be associated with inappropriate metformin prescription
              Conclusion: This study has revealed a high prevalence of inappropriate metformin prescription, indicating a remaining concern that requires further action to reduce the incidence of the drug misuse.

References

Group UPDS. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). The Lancet. 1998;352(9131):854-65.

Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017: American diabetes association; [online] 2017 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/suppl/2016/12/15/40.Supplement_1.DC1/DC_40_S1_final.pdf.

Bennett WL, Maruthur NM, Singh S, Segal JB, Wilson LM, Chatterjee R, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations. Annals of internal medicine. 2011;154(9):602-13.

Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HAW. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2008;359(15):1577-89.

Inzucchi SE, Lipska KJ, Mayo H, Bailey CJ, McGuire DK. Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease: a systematic review. Jama. 2014;312(24):2668-75.

Li L, Jick S, Gopalakrishnan C, Heide-Jorgensen U, Norrelund H, Sorensen HT, et al. Metformin use and risk of lactic acidosis in people with diabetes with and without renal impairment: a cohort study in Denmark and the UK. Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2017;34(4):485-9.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA revises warnings regarding use of the diabetes medicine metformin in certain patients with reduced kidney function [online] 2016 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM494140.pdf.

Diabetes Association of Thailand. Clinical Practiec Guideline for Diabetes 2017 [online] 2017 [cited 2017]. Available from: http://www.lpnh.go.th/newlp/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/CPG-2560-25-7-60-A5.pdf.

Ministry of public health. Service plan : Rational drug use. 2016.

Pongwecharak J, Tengmeesri N, Malanusorn N, Panthong M, Pawangkapin N. Prescribing metformin in type 2 diabetes with a contraindication: prevalence and outcome. Pharmacy world & science. 2009;31(4):481-6.

World Health Organization. ICD10 Version [online] 2016. [cited 2017] Available from: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en.

UNITED STATES RENAL DATA SYSTEM. CKD Analytic Methods.[online] [cited 2017] Available from: https://www.usrds.org/2015/view/v1_00_appx.aspx.

Baysari MT, Tariq A, Day RO, Westbrook JI. Alert override as a habitual behavior – a new perspective on a persistent problem. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2017;24(2):409-12.

Hung S-C, Chang Y-K, Liu J-S, Kuo K-L, Chen Y-H, Hsu C-C, et al. Metformin use and mortality in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: national, retrospective, observational, cohort study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology. 2015;3(8):605-14.

Kosmalski M, Drozdowska A, Sliwinska A, Drzewoski J. Inappropriate metformin prescribing in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Advances in medical sciences. 2012;57(1):65-70.

Emslie‐Smith AM, Boyle DI, Evans J, Sullivan F, Morris AD. Contraindications to metformin therapy in patients with Type 2 diabetes—a population‐based study of adherence to prescribing guidelines. Diabetic Medicine. 2001;18(6):483-8.

Stewart M. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method: Radcliffe Publishing; 2003.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-01

How to Cite

ปันทะ ป., & เตชะเคหะกิจ ว. (2019). The prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate metformin prescription in type 2 DM patients with contraindications: a case study in Thailand. Region 11 Medical Journal, 33(1), 131–140. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/188375

Issue

Section

Original articles