Differential diagnosis to clinically suspected acute appendicitis patients underwent computed tomygraphy (CT) of abdomen at Phang-nga Hospital

Authors

  • ชนิกา มหารักษ์ Suratthani Hospital

Keywords:

Acute appendicitis, CT abdomen

Abstract

              Objective: To identify alternative diagnoses of clinically suspected acute appendicitis in emergency CT abdomen at Phang-nga Hospital
              Materials and methods: Retrospective descriptive study was performed. Total 120 patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis underwent emergency abdominal CT scan for further evaluation at Phang-nga Hospital from July 2016 to December 2018. Patients were also stratified by gender and age groups. Follow by correlated the image interpretation with final diagnosis on medical chart or pathological report in surgical cases. The statistical analysis was done by using SPSS program for frequency, mean, percentage. The Pearson Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were also used to analyze statistical significant (P<0.05)
              Results: Of the 120 patients, appendicitis was diagnosed at emergency abdominal CT scan in 68 of 120 patients (56.7%), an alternative diagnosis was made at CT in 43 of 120 patients (35.8%). Non-specific diagnosis at CT was 9 of 120 patients (7.5%). Among the alternative diagnoses, the most common broad categories of disease detected at CT included non-appendiceal gastrointestinal conditions (11.7%), genitourinary conditions (9.2%), gynecologic condtiions (5.8%), and hepato-pancreatico-biliary conditions (4.2%). Sixty six of 111 patients (59.5%) who receiving a specific CT diagnosis underwent surgery or intervention compared with those patients who did not receive a specific diagnosis at CT, 0 of 9 patients (0%) underwent surgery.
              Conclusion: Abdominal CT is a useful noninvasive method for diagnosis of clinically suspected acute appendicitis. This advantage is to get the correct diagnosis not only the most common cause; appendicitis but also other alternative diagnoses for proper treatment planning and management.

References

1. Chatbanchai W, Hedley AJ, Ebrahim SB, Areemit S, Hoskyns EW, de Dombal FT. Acute abdominal pain and appendicitis in north east Thailand. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1989;3(4):448-59.

2. Snyder MJ, Guthrie M, Cagle S. Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management. American family physician. 2018;98(1):25-33.

3. Berry J, Jr., Malt RA. Appendicitis near its centenary. Annals of surgery. 1984;200(5):567-75.

4. Terasawa T, Blackmore CC, Bent S, Kohlwes RJ. Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasono graphy to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Annals of internal medicine. 2004;141(7):537-46.

5. Iqbal J, Sayani R, Tahir M, Mustahsan SM. Diagnostic Efficiency of Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Clinically Equivocal Cases of Acute Appendicitis with Surgical Correlation. Cureus. 2018; 10(3):e2249.

6. D’Souza N, Marsden M, Bottomley S, Nagarajah N, Scutt F, Toh S. Cost-effectiveness of routine imaging of suspected appendicitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100(1):47-51.

7. Pickhardt PJ, Lawrence EM, Pooler BD, Bruce RJ. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Annals of internal medicine. 2011;154(12):789-96, w-291.

8. Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C. CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2005;185(2):406-17.

9. Suthikeeree W, Lertdomrongdej L, Charoensak A. Diagnostic performance of CT findings in differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2010;93(12):1422-9.

10. Pooler BD, Lawrence EM, Pickhardt PJ. Alternative diagnoses to suspected appendicitis at CT. Radiology. 2012; 265(3):733-42.

11. Raman SS, Lu DS, Kadell BM, Vodopich DJ, Sayre J, Cryer H. Accuracy of nonfocused helical CT for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a 5-year review. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2002;178(6):1319-25.

12. Ashraf K, Ashraf O, Bari V, Rafique MZ, Usman MU, Chisti I. Role of focused appendiceal computed tomography in clinically equivocal acute appendicitis.
JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2006;56(5):200-3.

13. Wijetunga R, Tan BS, Rouse JC, Bigg-Wither GW, Doust BD. Diagnostic accuracy of focused appendiceal CT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. Radiology. 2001;221 (3):747-53.

14. Kamel IR, Goldberg SN, Keogan MT, Rosen MP, Raptopoulos V. Right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: nonfocused appendiceal CT--review of 100 cases. Radiology. 2000;217(1):159-63.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-01

How to Cite

มหารักษ์ ช. (2019). Differential diagnosis to clinically suspected acute appendicitis patients underwent computed tomygraphy (CT) of abdomen at Phang-nga Hospital. Region 11 Medical Journal, 33(2), 211–222. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Reg11MedJ/article/view/215779

Issue

Section

Original articles