A comparison of labor induction outcomes using a single dose of misoprostol followed by Oxytocin versus two doses of misoprostol in women undergoing labor induction at Surat thani Hospital
Keywords:
Induction of labor, Misoprostol, Oxytocin, Vaginal deliveryAbstract
Background: Induction of labor is a crucial obstetric procedure that plays a vital role in the care of pregnant women with medical indications, ensuring an appropriate and safe delivery. With the increasing rate of cesarean sections, induction of labor is essential to improving the chances of vaginal delivery. Choosing an effective and safe method is therefore necessary.
Objective: To compare vaginal delivery rates, induction time to vaginal delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes between single-dose misoprostol combined with Oxytocin and two doses of misoprostol.
Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted among 104 pregnant women undergoing labor induction between April 2025 and January 2026 at Surat Thani Hospital. Participants were allocated into two groups: single-dose misoprostol with Oxytocin and two doses of misoprostol. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups.
Results: The combination group demonstrated a significantly higher vaginal delivery rate compared to the two doses of misoprostol group (50% vs 17.3%, P<0.001). The mean duration of labor was significantly shorter in the combination group (9.72 ± 1.92 vs 12.47 ± 3.59 hours, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (1.9% vs 3.8%, P=0.558), fetal heart rate abnormalities (17.3% vs 11.5%, P=0.402) and uterine rupture. (0% vs 0%).
Conclusion: Single-dose misoprostol combined with Oxytocin is more effective in increasing vaginal delivery rates and reducing labor duration compared with two doses of misoprostol, without increasing maternal or neonatal complications.
References
คณะอนุกรรมการมาตรฐานวิชาชีพ พ.ศ.2565-2567. แนวทางเวชปฏิบัติของราชวิทยาลัยสตูินรีแพทย์แห่งประเทศไทย เรื่อง การชักนำการคลอด [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Available from https://www.rtcog.or.th/ photo/cpg/ CPG- Induction-of-La bor-edit-16May22-no-mark.pdf
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Practice Bulletin No.107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:386–397.
สายพิณ พงษธา. การชักนำการคลอดหรือการเร่งคลอด (Induction of Labor) [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 21]. Available from https://w1.med.cmu.ac.th/obgyn/lessons/induction-of-labor/
Morris JL, Winikoff B, Dabash R, Weeks A, Faundes A, Gemzell‐Danielsson K, et al. FIGO’s updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics. 2017.
Pimentel VM, Arabkhazaeli M, Moon J-Y, Wang A, Kapedani A, Bernstein PS, et al. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;218(6):614. e1-. e8.
Sanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, Mozurkewich EL, Ramsey PS, Adair CD, et al. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024;230(3):S669-S95.
Tesemma MG, Sori DA, Gemeda DH. High dose and low dose oxytocin regimens as determinants of successful labor induction: a multicenter comparative study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20:1-8.
Carlson N, Ellis J, Page K, Dunn Amore A, Phillippi J. Review of Evidence‐Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction. Journal of midwifery & women's health. 2021;66(4):459-69.
Acharya T, Devkota R, Bhattarai B, Acharya R. Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour. SAGE open medicine. 2017;5:2050312117700809.
Bracken H, Lightly K, Mundle S, Kerr R, Faragher B, Easterling T, et al. Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21:1-8.
Hofmeyr GJ, Gulmezoglu AM, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD000941.
Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus vaginal prostaglandin: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2016;123:1467–1476.
Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O. Membrane sweeping for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD000451.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Region11Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.