Absence of Imaging Signs in Perforated Peptic Ulcer

Authors

  • Ruxporn Thangteekaraks Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University
  • Wachira Wongtanasarasin Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai Univerisity

Keywords:

perforated peptic ulcer, peptic ulcer, absence, maging sign

Abstract

Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is a serious complication of peptic ulcer disease (PUD) that carries a risk of mortality of up to 30%. Early recognition, adequate resuscitation, and prompt surgical intervention are essential to provide good outcomes. Imaging such as plain film and computed tomography (CT) are frequently used for diagnosis confirmation. Herein, we reported a case of a 55-year-old man who presented with acute abdominal pain five hours before ED arrival. Physical examination showed a flat abdomen without surgical scarring and there was board-like rigidity on palpation. Acute abdominal series revealed no intra-abdominal free air. Subsequent abdominal CT scan with contrast also revealed no pneumoperitoneum. However, he was undergoing surgical intervention based on his clinical features that suggested PPU. The intra-operative finding showed a perforated pre-pyloric ulcer. He was discharged after five days of hospitalization without any complications. This case highlights the significance of clinical signs and symptoms and not solely relying on imaging findings.

References

Møller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, et al.: Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Br J Surg. 2011;98(6):802–10.

Chung KT, Shelat VG: Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;9(1):1.

Søreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, et al.: Perforated peptic ulcer HHS Public Access. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1288–98.

Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, Meer A von, et al.: Trends in Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15(8):1329–35.

Picone D, Rusignuolo R, Midiri F, et al.: Imaging Assessment of Gastroduodenal Perforations. Semin Ultrasound, CT MRI. 2016;37(1):16–22.

Coppolino FF, Gatta G, Grezia G Di, et al.: Gastrointestinal perforation : ultrasonographic diagnosis. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S4.

Singh JP, Steward MJ, Booth TC, et al.: Evolution of imaging for abdominal perforation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(3):182–8.

Sung HK, Sang SS, Yong YJ, et al.: Gastrointestinal tract perforation: MDCT findings according to the perforation sites. Korean J Radiol. 2009;10(1):63–70.

Grassi R, Romano S, Pinto A, et al.: Gastro-duodenal perforations : conventional plain film , US and CT findings in 166 consecutive patients. 2004;50:30–6.

Sung JJY, Kuipers EJ, El-Serag HB: Systematic review: The global incidence and prevalence of peptic ulcer disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29(9):938–46.

Hirschowitz BI, Simmons J, Mohnen J: Clinical outcome using lansoprazole in acid hypersecretors with and without Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: A 13-year prospective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(1):39–48.

Iaselli F, Antonietta M, Cristina M, et al.: Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma : a review. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0487-8 (Epub ahead of print).

Downloads

Published

2022-01-21

How to Cite

1.
Thangteekaraks R, Wongtanasarasin W. Absence of Imaging Signs in Perforated Peptic Ulcer. TJEM [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 21 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];3(2):28-36. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJEM/article/view/254687