Pelvic Binding Device from Resistance Band and Bed Sheet

Authors

  • Piriya Treerattanapan Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine,Trang hospital
  • ์Nat Krairojananan Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Pharmongkutklao hospital
  • Kitisak Sanprasert Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Pharmongkutklao hospital

Keywords:

Pelvic binding device, resistance band, bed sheet

Abstract

Background Pelvic injuries are common in blunt injury mechanisms. Unstable pelvis fracture results in an increased pelvic volume that can accommodate a large volume of blood and rapid death. The pelvis can be stabilized with a binder or sheet to limit this expansion and control hemorrhage.
Objective To compare a pelvic binding device from resistance band and bed sheet and compare its effectiveness with commercial pelvic binding device.
Method Experimental study for comparing pelvic binding device from resistance band and bedsheet. Between 1st May -30th September 2021, twenty- four emergency medicine residents of Phramongkutklao hospital were enroll. This study was done in two consecutive parts. Firstly, the volunteers pulled the 25 kg resistance exercise band until reach an appropriate tension 150 N that able to hold the fracture. The stretching length were recorded. Secondly, the resistance band was assembled to bed sheet for creating a pelvic binding device. Then the volunteers were asked to apply the device to simulated patient with appropriate length. The time of applying was recorded comparing with commercial pelvic binding device (T-test).
Results The length that volunteers pulled the resistance band to reach 150 N was 12.22 ± 0.04 cm. The time for applying the pelvic binding device made from resistance band was 68.21 seconds, comparing to commercial device at 68.01 seconds (P-value 0.290).
Conclusion The pelvic binding device made from resistance band and bed sheet is effective for holding the pelvic fracture. The time use for applying this device comparing to commercial device was not different.

References

Moreno C, Moore EE, Rosenberger A, Cleveland HC. Hemorrhage associated with major pelvic fracture: a multispecialty challenge. J Trauma 1986;26(11):987-94. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198611000-00005.

Bakhshayesh P, Boutefnouchet T, Tötterman A. Effectiveness of non invasive external pelvic compression: a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2016;24:73. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0259-7.

Simpson T, Krieg JC, Heuer F, Bottlang M. Stabilization of pelvic ring disruptions with a circumferential sheet. J Trauma 2002 ;52(1):158-61. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200201000-00027.

Zingg T, Piaget-Rossel R, Steppacher J, Carron PN, Dami F, Borens O, et al. Prehospital use of pelvic circumferential compression devices in a physician-based emergency medical service: A 6-year retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):5106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62027-6.

Pap R, McKeown R, Lockwood C, Stephenson M, Simpson P. Pelvic circumferential compression devices for prehospital management of suspected pelvic fractures: a rapid review and evidence summary for quality indicator evaluation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020;28(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00762-5.

Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Tzioupis C, Dinopoulos H, Wells GE, Bouamra O, Lecky F. Prevalence of pelvic fractures, associated injuries, and mortality: the United Kingdom perspective. J Trauma 2007;63(4): 875-83. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000242259.67486.15.

Vallamshetla VRP, Silva UD, Bache CE, Gibbons PJ. Flexible intramedullary nails for unstable fractures of the tibia in children. An eight-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(4):536-40. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17363.

Hsu SD, Chen CJ, Chou YC, Wang SH, Chan DC. Effect of early pelvic binder use in the emergency management of suspected pelvic trauma: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(10):1217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101217.

Fu CY, Wu YT, Liao CH, Kang SC, Wang SY, Hsu YP, et al. Pelvic circumferential compression devices benefit patients with pelvic fractures who need transfers. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31(10):1432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.044.

Reiter A, Strahl A, Kothe S, Pleizier M, Frosch KH, Mader K, et al. Does a prehospital applied pelvic binder improve patient survival? Injury 2024;55(4):111392. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111392.

Knops SP, Schep NW, Spoor CW, van Riel MP, Spanjersberg WR, Kleinrensink GJ, et al. Comparison of three different pelvic circumferential compression devices: a biomechanical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93(3):230-40. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00084.

Naseem H, Nesbitt PD, Sprott DC, Clayson A. An assessment of pelvic binder placement at a UK major trauma centre. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018;100(2):101-5. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0159.

Khaliq F, Rodham P. EMS Pelvic Binders. 2024 Jan 1. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan. [cited 8 august 2024.] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK598968/

Downloads

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

1.
Treerattanapan P, Krairojananan ์, Sanprasert K. Pelvic Binding Device from Resistance Band and Bed Sheet. TJEM [internet]. 2025 Jan. 25 [cited 2025 Dec. 25];6(1):27-38. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/TJEM/article/view/260744