Comparison of efficacy outcomes of video-based learning and traditional face-to-face learning of intraosseous catheterization in Thai medical interns educated abroad
Keywords:
Intraosseous catheterization, Video-based learning, Face-to-face learningAbstract
Introduction
Intraosseous catheterization is an essential procedure for physicians in emergency care. It was traditionally taught through face-to-face practical training, but there is now an increasing use of video media in the education of medical interns.
Objectives
This study compares the effectiveness of learning intraosseous catheterization through video-based learning and traditional face-to-face learning, and to assess the effectiveness of video-based learning over a four-week period.
Method
This research is designed as a prospective study and a randomized controlled trial. It was conducted among Thai interns who graduated from international institutions and underwent training at Lerdsin Hospital, with data collected from June 1, 2023 to November 1, 2023. Fifty nine participants were included in the study, divided into two groups: Group V (video-based learning) with 29 participants, and Group T (face-to-face learning) with 30 participants. Both groups were evaluated through pre-test and post-test with multiple-choice tests, post-test practical examinations, satisfaction surveys, and a follow-up assessment conducted four weeks after the training. The quality of the test items was assessed using Index of Item-Objective Congruence.
Result
In the multiple-choice test, which had a maximum score of 10, Group V had a mean post-test score of 8.586 (SD 1.296), significantly higher than Group T, which had a mean score of 7.833 (SD 1.367) (p=0.034). Furthermore, when evaluating the learning outcomes within Group V, it was found that the mean post-test score four weeks later was 9.00 (SD 1.50), which was significantly higher than the pre-test mean score of 3.00 (SD 2.00) (p<0.001). Additionally, the satisfaction rating regarding the appropriateness of the learning duration in Group V was 5.00 (IQR 0), significantly higher than that of Group T, which was rated at 4.00 (IQR 2.00) (p<0.001).
Conclusion
Video-based learning on intraosseous fluid catheterization is effective and does not differ from traditional face-to-face learning.
References
Laohakul P. Intraosseous Catheterization. In: Trinarongsakul T, Chakorn T, editors. The Advanced Resuscitative Procedure course. 2nded. Bangkok: Thai College of Emergency Physicians; 2020:259-67.
Deitch K. Intraosseous Infusion. In: Roberts J, Custalow C, Thomson W, editors. Robert & Hedges’ Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2019:461-75.
Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, Cheng A, Aziz K, Berg KM, Lavonas E, et al. 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2020;142:S337-57. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918
Soar J, Bottiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djarv T, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2021;161:115-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010.
The Medical Council of Thailand. Regulations for training Thai national medical interns who graduated with a Doctor of Medicine degree from abroad, 2022. Announcement 99/2565. 2022 Nov 10.
The Medical Council of Thailand. Criteria for knowledge and competency assessment for obtaining a medical practice license, B.E. 2024. Announcement No. 4/2567. 2023 Dec 14.
Kang SY, Yoo J, Park S, Jo IJ, Kim S, Cho H, et al. Online learning versus hands-on learning of basic ocular ultrasound skills: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58(7):960. doi: 10.3390/medicina58070960
Soni NJ, Boyd JS, Mints G, Proud KC, Jensen TP, Liu G, et al. Comparison of in-person versus tele-ultrasound point-of-care ultrasound training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultrasound J 2021; 13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13089-021-00242-6
Zaghal A, Marley C, Rahhal S, Hassanieh J, Saadeh R, El-Rifai A, et al. Face-to-face versus distance learning of basic suturing skills in novice learners: A quantitative prospective randomized trial. BMC Med Educ 2022;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022- 03353-3
Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, Gehlbach H. Developing questionnaires for Educational Research: AMEE guide no. 87. Med Teach 2014;36(6):463–74. doi: 10.3109/014215 9X.2014.889814
Phisit T, Pana J. The real meaning of IOC. Journal of Educational Measurement, Mahasarakham University 2018;24(2):3-12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Thai Collage of Emergency Physicians
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเวชศาสตร์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทย ถือเป็นเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ วิทยาลัยแพทย์เวชศาสตร์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทย
กรณีที่บทความได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสารเวชศาสตร์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทยแล้ว จะตีพิมพ์ในรูปแบบอิเล็กทรอนิกส์ ไม่มีสำเนาการพิมพ์ภายหลังหนังสือเผยแพร่เรียบร้อยแล้ว ผู้นิพนธ์ไม่สามารถนำบทความดังกล่าวไปนำเสนอหรือตีพิมพ์ในรูปแบบใดๆ ที่อื่นได้ หากมิได้รับคำอนุญาตจากวารสารเวชศาสตร์ฉุกเฉินแห่งประเทศไทย
