An Effective Administration Model for Institute of Physical Education

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to construct effective administrative model for Institute of Physical Education with 3 specific objectives, including 1) to determine current practice, problem and administrative needs of the Institute, 2) to construct the effective administration model for the Institute and 3) to evaluate the suitability, possibility and benefit of the constructed model. Three research phases were used as the research procedure, including : Phase 1 to develop questionnaire for determining current practice, problem and administrative needs with 232 subjects composing of the administrators and the Instructors in all 17 campuses; Phase 2 to develop the administrative model which was evaluated the objective congruence and the drafted model by the experts; and Phase 3 to evaluate the developed model by focus group discussion among the concerned experts. The results of the study were as follow.

1. The Education Physical Institute operated on general work, academic, research, budget and human resource “moderately and had “much” problems on research, structure, human resource, leadership, academic and decentralization and empowerment. However, there were “moderate” problem on budget, information technology and communication and policy making distribution. Moreover, they needed for academic promotion, human resource development, a person development leadership training.


2. The constructed model had high objective congruence and very much suitability and benefit of the model, but much on possibility.
   

   According to the above – mentioned results the administrative model for Institute of Physical Education which was suitable, possible and beneficial was as follows.

   
   

   (1) Administering by concentrating on the principles of decentralization from the Central Official to the Campus, participation of all concern personnel and coordination between the central office and campus which had specific context.

   
   

   (2) Aiming at attainability of the Institute mission and TQF.

   
   

   (3) Organizing administrative mechanism which was appropriate to the Central and the Campus levels and there were the office of strategy development for the Central office and the centers for development in individual campus.

   
   

   (4) Carrying on administration of both the Central Office and the Campus by concentrating on the committee. The Central office designated the goals and strategies and decentralized all missions of higher education for attending TQF and each campus curried on monitoring, supervising evaluating systematically.

   
   

   (5) Using multiple ways for evaluating by the qualified personnel consisting with reality and distributed good practices for knowing and improving.

   
   

   (6) The realization, the vision ,the accountability and strategy including aiming at the institute success of the administrators of both the Central Office and the Campus were the key success of the Institute.