DEVELOPMENT OF INDICATORS FOR SWIMMING REFERESS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This purpose of this study was to study the competency of swimming referees. This wa a research and development project using a mixed method research. The semi-structured interview was used as the research instrument, the content validity of which was found at 0.98, and the reliability of which was found at 0.70. he research instrument was also improved before data collection. he in-depth interview was conducted with five key informants by purposive selection. The data analysis was based on competence concept of McClelland, and theoretical research framework, and conducted by a in -depth interviews method with a panel of ten experts for reviewing appropriateness, feasibility and expected benefits.
The results found that:
- 1. The competency of swimming referees were classified into 2 groups: main and specific competency. The main competency consists of 5 sub - competency. As for specific competency, it consisted of 9 sub - competency.
- 2. Regarding the results of the creation and development of indicators for the main and specific competency of swimming referees, the indicators of the main and specific competency of swimming referees had 97 indicators. As for the specific competency had 44 indicators.
- 3. The results of the construct validity of the competency and competency indicators of swimming referees showed that the main competency of swimming referees includes 5 components and 53 indicators (=4.68, S.D. = 0.48) which were appropriate at the highest level. In addition to the specific competency of swimming referees, it covered 9 components and 44 indicators (= 4.58, S.D. = 0.56), which were appropriate at the highest level as well.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The published article is a copyright of the Academic Journal of Thailand National Sports University. The passage appeared in each article in this academic journal is a perspective of each author which is not related to the journal. Each author is required to be responsible for all components of his/her own article. If there are any mistakes, each author must be responsible for those mistakes on his/her own.
References
Arafat Haadni. (2019). Core competencies of small school administrators Under the Songkhla Primary Education Area Office, Area 3 (Master's Thesis), Hat Yai University.
Atchara Lortrakul. (2014). Developing the competency of government university employees (Doctoral dissertation), Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University.
Benjaporn Watikarn. (2016). Guidelines for developing the core competencies of private school
administrators under the Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area Office, Area 2 (Doctoral dissertation), Hat Yai University.
Boonchom Srisa – Ard. (2017). Basic research. Suwiriya Company.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E., (2010). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice - Hall.
McClelland, D. C. (1998). Identifying Competencies with Behavioral-Event Interviews. Psychological Science, 9(5), 331 - 339.
Maneerat Raksaphon. (2016). Core competencies of personnel under the Ministry of Public Health: A Case studies of public health technical officer in service networks 8 (Master's thesis), Maha Sarakham University.
Nattapong Jontapa. (2018). Development of performance indicators of basketball Referees (Master’s thesis), Srinakharinwirot University.
