Video Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation
Article Sidebar
Published:
Sep 1, 2016
Keywords:
Video laryngoscope difficult intubation airway equipment
Main Article Content
Abstract
In case of intubation for patients under emergency conditions, health care providers seem to face more unexpected difficulties performing that to those in normal conditions. Nowadays, equipment for intubation has been much developed, so-called “video laryngoscope” to help improve laryngoscopic views and increase a success rate in intubation for patients under a difficult intubation condition. However, it is very important to understand its effectiveness of the equipment utilization and more importantly to gain insights into the experiences of users. This article aims to introduce the equipment utilization techniques of video laryngoscope, advantages and disadvantages of different types of video laryngoscope in Thailand. It is also to assist physicians and users to be able to select a proper device for patients under different conditions, thereby increasing in a higher success rate of intubation and bringing down a number of complications that may occur during the equipment utilization.
Article Details
How to Cite
Siraklow, S., & Weerayutwattana, R. (2016). Video Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation. Vajira Medical Journal : Journal of Urban Medicine, 60(3), 211–221. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/VMED/article/view/192698
Section
Review Articles
References
1. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway: An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:251-70.
2. Wong E, Ng YY. The difficult airway in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2008;1:107-11.
3. Michailidou M, O’Keeffe T, Mosier JM, Friese RS, Joseph B, Rhee P. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39:782-8.
4. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:629-36.
5. Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: A randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:544-8.
6. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:546-50.
7. Koh JC, Lee JS, Lee YW, Chang CH. Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59:314-8.
8. Lim Y, Yeo SW. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:243-7.
9. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723-30.
10. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761-8. การใส่ท่อช่วยหายใจด้วยวิดีโอลาริงซ์โกสโคป (Video laryngoscope) 221 ศิริพร ศิระเกล้า รัชยา วีระยุทธวัฒนะ Vol. 60 No. 3 July – September 2016 Vajira Medical Journal: Journal of Urban Medicine
11. Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Thériault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual inline stabilization: Direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:935-41.
12. Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: A comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with videoassisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:24-30.
13. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: An analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:34-41.
14. Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:54-7.
15. Hirabayashi Y. Pharyngeal injury related to GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:175-6.
16. Malik MA, Frogel JK. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1610-1.
17. Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:19-21.
18. Hurtford WE. The video revolution: A new view of Laryngoscopy. Respir Care. 2010;55:1036-45.
19. Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, Lin KJ. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28: 788-95.
20. Van Zundert A, Pieters B, Doerges V, Gatt S. Video laryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:1014-5.
21. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Churasia S, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA Ctrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:654-61.
22. Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia AT. Comparison of three videoolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1126-32.
23. Liu EH, Goy RW, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:446-51.
24. Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Kamata T, Yokochi M, Hara K. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: Fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:120-4.
25. Maharaj CH, Buckley E, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A comparison of macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:53-9.
2. Wong E, Ng YY. The difficult airway in the emergency department. Int J Emerg Med. 2008;1:107-11.
3. Michailidou M, O’Keeffe T, Mosier JM, Friese RS, Joseph B, Rhee P. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World J Surg. 2015;39:782-8.
4. Aziz MF, Dillman D, Fu R, Brambrink AM. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:629-36.
5. Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, Kamishima K, Okuda Y. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: A randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:544-8.
6. Jungbauer A, Schumann M, Brunkhorst V, Börgers A, Groeben H. Expected difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:546-50.
7. Koh JC, Lee JS, Lee YW, Chang CH. Comparison of the laryngeal view during intubation using Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization and mouth opening limitation. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010;59:314-8.
8. Lim Y, Yeo SW. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005;33:243-7.
9. Malik MA, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:723-30.
10. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:761-8. การใส่ท่อช่วยหายใจด้วยวิดีโอลาริงซ์โกสโคป (Video laryngoscope) 221 ศิริพร ศิระเกล้า รัชยา วีระยุทธวัฒนะ Vol. 60 No. 3 July – September 2016 Vajira Medical Journal: Journal of Urban Medicine
11. Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, Guilbert F, Thériault M, Drolet P. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual inline stabilization: Direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:935-41.
12. Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: A comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with videoassisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:24-30.
13. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: An analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:34-41.
14. Cooper RM. Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:54-7.
15. Hirabayashi Y. Pharyngeal injury related to GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:175-6.
16. Malik MA, Frogel JK. Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1610-1.
17. Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS. Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth. 2007;19:19-21.
18. Hurtford WE. The video revolution: A new view of Laryngoscopy. Respir Care. 2010;55:1036-45.
19. Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, Lin KJ. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28: 788-95.
20. Van Zundert A, Pieters B, Doerges V, Gatt S. Video laryngoscopy allows a better view of the pharynx and larynx than classic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:1014-5.
21. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Churasia S, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of the Airwayscope, LMA Ctrach, and the Macintosh laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:654-61.
22. Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia AT. Comparison of three videoolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:1126-32.
23. Liu EH, Goy RW, Tan BH, Asai T. Tracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopes in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A randomized trial of the Airway Scope and the GlideScope. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:446-51.
24. Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Kamata T, Yokochi M, Hara K. Upper cervical spine movement during intubation: Fluoroscopic comparison of the AirWay Scope, McCoy laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:120-4.
25. Maharaj CH, Buckley E, Harte BH, Laffey JG. Endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A comparison of macintosh and airtraq laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:53-9.