Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jun 1, 2018
Keywords:
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement
Main Article Content
Abstract
Over the past two decades, minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has grown in popularity in modern cardiac surgery. Apart from cosmetic benefits, MIAVR is increasingly being used with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of the operative procedure, while maintaining the same efficacy, quality and safety of the standard approach. This review intends to discuss the evidence surrounding MIAVR and show a summary of current evidence supporting the utilization of minimal access.
Article Details
How to Cite
Sadad, Z., & Kanoksin, S. (2018). Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement. Vajira Medical Journal : Journal of Urban Medicine, 62(3), 235–244. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/VMED/article/view/195293
Section
Review Articles
References
1. Harken DE, Taylor WJ, Lefemine AA, Lunzer S, Low HB, Cohen ML, et al. Aortic valve replacement with a caged ball valve. Am J Cardiol. 1962 Feb;9:292–9.
2. Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jun;65(6):1535–9.
3. Martens S, Neumann K, Sodemann C, Deschka H, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Moritz A. Carbon dioxide field flooding reduces neurologic impairment after open heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):543–7.
4. Magovern GJ, Cromie HW. Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963 Dec;46:726–36.
5. Scott SM, Sethi GK, Flye MW, Takaro T. The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model. Ann Surg. 1976 Aug;184(2):174–8.
6. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct;363(17):1597–607.
7. Svensson LG, D’Agostino RS. “J” incision minimal-access valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Sep;66(3):1110–2.
8. Ariyaratnam P, Loubani M, Griffin SC. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015 Sep;23(7):814–21.
9. Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, Schonbrodt M, Renner A, Hakim Meibodi K, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Aug;46(2):221–7.
10. Attia RQ, Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B, Roxburgh JC, Kumar P, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study from the UK National Data. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(1):15–23.
11. Shehada S-E, Ozturk O, Wottke M, Lange R. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):464–70.
12. Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, Kron IL, Speir AM, Fonner EJ, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1060–5.
13. Korach A, Shemin RJ, Hunter CT, Bao Y, Shapira OM. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Jun;51(3):417–21.
14. Neely RC, Boskovski MT, Gosev I, Kaneko T, McGurk S, Leacche M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women’s Hospital experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):38–48.
15. Merk DR, Lehmann S, Holzhey DM, Dohmen P, Candolfi P, Misfeld M, et al. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):11–7.
16. Benetti FJ, Mariani MA, Rizzardi JL, Benetti I. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Apr;113(4):806–7.
17. Bowdish ME, Hui DS, Cleveland JD, Mack WJ, Sinha R, Ranjan R, et al. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):456–63.
18. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1222–6.
19. Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Kaufmann P, Genoni M, Falk V, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):1851–6.
20. Gilmanov D, Bevilacqua S, Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Kallushi E, et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837–43.
21. Shehada S-E, Elhmidi Y, Mourad F, Wendt D, El Gabry M, Benedik J, et al. Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;25(4): 624–32.
22. Lim JY, Deo S V, Altarabsheh SE, Jung SH, Erwin PJ, Markowitz AH, et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data. J Card Surg. 2015 Feb;30(2):125–34.
23. Welp HA, Herlemann I, Martens S, Deschka H. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar.[Epub ahead of print]
24. Gilmanov D, Miceli A, Ferrarini M, Farneti P, Murzi M, Solinas M, et al. Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1585–92.
25. Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, Santarpino G, Glaser N, De Praetere H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):220–7.
26. Pollari F, Santarpino G, Dell’Aquila AM, Gazdag L, Alnahas H, Vogt F, et al. Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: a propensity-matched score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):611–7.
27. Phan K, Tsai Y-C, Niranjan N, Bouchard D, Carrel TP, Dapunt OE, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):100–11.
28. Meco M, Montisci A, Miceli A, Panisi P, Donatelli F, Cirri S, et al. Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses:Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb;7(4):e006091.
2. Cosgrove DM 3rd, Sabik JF, Navia JL. Minimally invasive valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jun;65(6):1535–9.
3. Martens S, Neumann K, Sodemann C, Deschka H, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Moritz A. Carbon dioxide field flooding reduces neurologic impairment after open heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Feb;85(2):543–7.
4. Magovern GJ, Cromie HW. Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1963 Dec;46:726–36.
5. Scott SM, Sethi GK, Flye MW, Takaro T. The sutureless aortic valve prosthesis: experience with and technical considerations for replacement of the early model. Ann Surg. 1976 Aug;184(2):174–8.
6. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct;363(17):1597–607.
7. Svensson LG, D’Agostino RS. “J” incision minimal-access valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Sep;66(3):1110–2.
8. Ariyaratnam P, Loubani M, Griffin SC. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Comparison of long-term outcomes. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2015 Sep;23(7):814–21.
9. Furukawa N, Kuss O, Aboud A, Schonbrodt M, Renner A, Hakim Meibodi K, et al. Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: matched propensity score analysis of 808 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Aug;46(2):221–7.
10. Attia RQ, Hickey GL, Grant SW, Bridgewater B, Roxburgh JC, Kumar P, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study from the UK National Data. Innovations (Phila). 2016;11(1):15–23.
11. Shehada S-E, Ozturk O, Wottke M, Lange R. Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):464–70.
12. Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, Kron IL, Speir AM, Fonner EJ, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Apr;149(4):1060–5.
13. Korach A, Shemin RJ, Hunter CT, Bao Y, Shapira OM. Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010 Jun;51(3):417–21.
14. Neely RC, Boskovski MT, Gosev I, Kaneko T, McGurk S, Leacche M, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement versus aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy: the Brigham and Women’s Hospital experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):38–48.
15. Merk DR, Lehmann S, Holzhey DM, Dohmen P, Candolfi P, Misfeld M, et al. Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):11–7.
16. Benetti FJ, Mariani MA, Rizzardi JL, Benetti I. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Apr;113(4):806–7.
17. Bowdish ME, Hui DS, Cleveland JD, Mack WJ, Sinha R, Ranjan R, et al. A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):456–63.
18. Glauber M, Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Ferrarini M, Bevilacqua S, Farneti PA, et al. Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1222–6.
19. Plass A, Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Kaufmann P, Genoni M, Falk V, et al. Aortic valve replacement through a minimally invasive approach: preoperative planning, surgical technique, and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):1851–6.
20. Gilmanov D, Bevilacqua S, Murzi M, Cerillo AG, Gasbarri T, Kallushi E, et al. Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837–43.
21. Shehada S-E, Elhmidi Y, Mourad F, Wendt D, El Gabry M, Benedik J, et al. Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct;25(4): 624–32.
22. Lim JY, Deo S V, Altarabsheh SE, Jung SH, Erwin PJ, Markowitz AH, et al. Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data. J Card Surg. 2015 Feb;30(2):125–34.
23. Welp HA, Herlemann I, Martens S, Deschka H. Outcomes of aortic valve replacement via partial upper sternotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement in obese patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Mar.[Epub ahead of print]
24. Gilmanov D, Miceli A, Ferrarini M, Farneti P, Murzi M, Solinas M, et al. Aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy: can sutureless technology improve clinical outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1585–92.
25. Dalen M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, Santarpino G, Glaser N, De Praetere H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a sutureless bioprosthesis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49(1):220–7.
26. Pollari F, Santarpino G, Dell’Aquila AM, Gazdag L, Alnahas H, Vogt F, et al. Better short-term outcome by using sutureless valves: a propensity-matched score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):611–7.
27. Phan K, Tsai Y-C, Niranjan N, Bouchard D, Carrel TP, Dapunt OE, et al. Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):100–11.
28. Meco M, Montisci A, Miceli A, Panisi P, Donatelli F, Cirri S, et al. Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses:Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb;7(4):e006091.